致幻剂使用者的不良反应:挪威对挑战性体验问卷的验证

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Kristoffer A.A. Andersen , Bjørn Holmøy , Tor-Morten Kvam , Matthew W. Johnson
{"title":"致幻剂使用者的不良反应:挪威对挑战性体验问卷的验证","authors":"Kristoffer A.A. Andersen ,&nbsp;Bjørn Holmøy ,&nbsp;Tor-Morten Kvam ,&nbsp;Matthew W. Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.05.062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Psychedelic drugs, known for their potent psychoactive effects, have gained attention for their potential therapeutic benefits in treating mental disorders. However, distressing experiences induced by psychedelics can lead to adverse long-term effects. To better assess these experiences, we aimed to provide a Norwegian translation and psychometric validation of the Challenging Experience Questionnaire (CEQ), a key tool for evaluating adverse psychedelic experiences. Our study employed an anonymous online survey targeting Norwegian recreational psychedelic users, focusing on their most memorable psychedelic encounter. A sample of 729 participants, predominantly male (73 %) and aged between 26 and 35 years (41 %), with 90 % having used LSD or psilocybin, was analyzed. Half of the participants had completed a university degree, and 48 % reported a diagnosed mental disorder. The CEQ underwent a rigorous seven-stage translation process and was included in the survey to validate the original 7-factor structure. Our findings revealed excellent internal consistency (alpha = 0.94) and robust overall model fit (χ<sup>2</sup>[278] = 1451.80, RMSEA = 0.076, SRMR = 0.051, CFI = 0.913) for the 7-factor model, with evidence of factorial invariance across gender and psychiatric status. Further, the relationship between reported difficulty and CEQ factors such as fear, grief, insanity, and death underscored its convergent validity. In conclusion, our study confirms the 7-factor structure of the CEQ while demonstrating its reliability and validity. This provides Norwegian researchers with a culturally adapted, psychometrically valid tool for assessing complex adverse reactions to psychedelic use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"189 ","pages":"Pages 18-25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse reactions among psychedelic users: Norwegian validation of the Challenging Experience Questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"Kristoffer A.A. Andersen ,&nbsp;Bjørn Holmøy ,&nbsp;Tor-Morten Kvam ,&nbsp;Matthew W. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.05.062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Psychedelic drugs, known for their potent psychoactive effects, have gained attention for their potential therapeutic benefits in treating mental disorders. However, distressing experiences induced by psychedelics can lead to adverse long-term effects. To better assess these experiences, we aimed to provide a Norwegian translation and psychometric validation of the Challenging Experience Questionnaire (CEQ), a key tool for evaluating adverse psychedelic experiences. Our study employed an anonymous online survey targeting Norwegian recreational psychedelic users, focusing on their most memorable psychedelic encounter. A sample of 729 participants, predominantly male (73 %) and aged between 26 and 35 years (41 %), with 90 % having used LSD or psilocybin, was analyzed. Half of the participants had completed a university degree, and 48 % reported a diagnosed mental disorder. The CEQ underwent a rigorous seven-stage translation process and was included in the survey to validate the original 7-factor structure. Our findings revealed excellent internal consistency (alpha = 0.94) and robust overall model fit (χ<sup>2</sup>[278] = 1451.80, RMSEA = 0.076, SRMR = 0.051, CFI = 0.913) for the 7-factor model, with evidence of factorial invariance across gender and psychiatric status. Further, the relationship between reported difficulty and CEQ factors such as fear, grief, insanity, and death underscored its convergent validity. In conclusion, our study confirms the 7-factor structure of the CEQ while demonstrating its reliability and validity. This provides Norwegian researchers with a culturally adapted, psychometrically valid tool for assessing complex adverse reactions to psychedelic use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 18-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychiatric research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625003620\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395625003620","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

致幻剂以其强大的精神活性作用而闻名,因其在治疗精神障碍方面的潜在治疗益处而受到关注。然而,由致幻剂引起的痛苦经历会导致不良的长期影响。为了更好地评估这些体验,我们的目的是提供挪威语翻译和心理测量验证挑战性体验问卷(CEQ),这是评估不良迷幻体验的关键工具。我们的研究采用了一项匿名在线调查,针对挪威的休闲致幻剂使用者,重点关注他们最难忘的致幻剂经历。研究分析了729名参与者的样本,主要是男性(73%),年龄在26至35岁之间(41%),其中90%使用过LSD或裸盖菇素。一半的参与者完成了大学学位,48%的人报告被诊断为精神障碍。CEQ经过了严格的七阶段翻译过程,并被纳入调查以验证原始的七因素结构。我们的研究结果显示,7因素模型具有良好的内部一致性(alpha = 0.94)和稳健的整体模型拟合(χ2[278] = 1451.80, RMSEA = 0.076, SRMR = 0.051, CFI = 0.913),并证明了性别和精神状态之间的因子不变性。此外,报告的困难与CEQ因素(如恐惧、悲伤、精神错乱和死亡)之间的关系强调了其趋同效度。总之,我们的研究证实了CEQ的七因子结构,并证明了其信度和效度。这为挪威研究人员提供了一种适应文化的、心理测量学上有效的工具来评估迷幻药使用的复杂不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adverse reactions among psychedelic users: Norwegian validation of the Challenging Experience Questionnaire
Psychedelic drugs, known for their potent psychoactive effects, have gained attention for their potential therapeutic benefits in treating mental disorders. However, distressing experiences induced by psychedelics can lead to adverse long-term effects. To better assess these experiences, we aimed to provide a Norwegian translation and psychometric validation of the Challenging Experience Questionnaire (CEQ), a key tool for evaluating adverse psychedelic experiences. Our study employed an anonymous online survey targeting Norwegian recreational psychedelic users, focusing on their most memorable psychedelic encounter. A sample of 729 participants, predominantly male (73 %) and aged between 26 and 35 years (41 %), with 90 % having used LSD or psilocybin, was analyzed. Half of the participants had completed a university degree, and 48 % reported a diagnosed mental disorder. The CEQ underwent a rigorous seven-stage translation process and was included in the survey to validate the original 7-factor structure. Our findings revealed excellent internal consistency (alpha = 0.94) and robust overall model fit (χ2[278] = 1451.80, RMSEA = 0.076, SRMR = 0.051, CFI = 0.913) for the 7-factor model, with evidence of factorial invariance across gender and psychiatric status. Further, the relationship between reported difficulty and CEQ factors such as fear, grief, insanity, and death underscored its convergent validity. In conclusion, our study confirms the 7-factor structure of the CEQ while demonstrating its reliability and validity. This provides Norwegian researchers with a culturally adapted, psychometrically valid tool for assessing complex adverse reactions to psychedelic use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信