基于无人机多光谱影像估算水稻叶面积指数的机器学习模型比较

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sumit Kumar Vishwakarma, Benu Bhattarai, Kritika Kothari, Ashish Pandey
{"title":"基于无人机多光谱影像估算水稻叶面积指数的机器学习模型比较","authors":"Sumit Kumar Vishwakarma,&nbsp;Benu Bhattarai,&nbsp;Kritika Kothari,&nbsp;Ashish Pandey","doi":"10.1016/j.pce.2025.103977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Leaf Area Index (LAI) serves as a crucial biophysical indicator, providing valuable insights into canopy vigor and water use. Accurate LAI estimation is essential for crop monitoring, and crop yield prediction. The present study assessed the efficacy of different machine learning (ML) algorithms in estimating LAI obtained from field experiment conducted in Roorkee, India, where rice was grown under two irrigation techniques, and three nitrogen levels. LAI was measured using a ceptometer and images were captured from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-borne multispectral sensor. Nine ML models were built using 20 vegetation indices, which included Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Ridge Regression, Lasso Regression, Elastic Net Regression, Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression (XGBoosting), Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Random Forest (RF). Among the vegetation indices used in the study, ENDVI and EG showed the highest positive correlation (r = 0.68) with LAI values. Other vegetation indices such as NDVI, ARVI, OSAVI, and NDI also had a positive correlation (r ≥ 0.60) with LAI values. During model testing, lower R<sup>2</sup> values were recorded for MLR (0.74), Ridge (0.75), Lasso (0.78), ElasticNet (0.74), and XGBoosting (0.77) models, while KNN (0.82), SVM (0.84), ANN (0.83), and RF (0.80) models performed better. Overall, the SVM outperformed other ML algorithms in predicting the LAI of rice under different treatments. Our study demonstrated that UAV-based multispectral images coupled with ML algorithms are capable of producing LAI of rice with reasonable accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54616,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 103977"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intercomparison of machine learning models for estimating leaf area index of rice using UAV-based multispectral imagery\",\"authors\":\"Sumit Kumar Vishwakarma,&nbsp;Benu Bhattarai,&nbsp;Kritika Kothari,&nbsp;Ashish Pandey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pce.2025.103977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Leaf Area Index (LAI) serves as a crucial biophysical indicator, providing valuable insights into canopy vigor and water use. Accurate LAI estimation is essential for crop monitoring, and crop yield prediction. The present study assessed the efficacy of different machine learning (ML) algorithms in estimating LAI obtained from field experiment conducted in Roorkee, India, where rice was grown under two irrigation techniques, and three nitrogen levels. LAI was measured using a ceptometer and images were captured from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-borne multispectral sensor. Nine ML models were built using 20 vegetation indices, which included Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Ridge Regression, Lasso Regression, Elastic Net Regression, Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression (XGBoosting), Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Random Forest (RF). Among the vegetation indices used in the study, ENDVI and EG showed the highest positive correlation (r = 0.68) with LAI values. Other vegetation indices such as NDVI, ARVI, OSAVI, and NDI also had a positive correlation (r ≥ 0.60) with LAI values. During model testing, lower R<sup>2</sup> values were recorded for MLR (0.74), Ridge (0.75), Lasso (0.78), ElasticNet (0.74), and XGBoosting (0.77) models, while KNN (0.82), SVM (0.84), ANN (0.83), and RF (0.80) models performed better. Overall, the SVM outperformed other ML algorithms in predicting the LAI of rice under different treatments. Our study demonstrated that UAV-based multispectral images coupled with ML algorithms are capable of producing LAI of rice with reasonable accuracy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth\",\"volume\":\"140 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103977\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474706525001275\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474706525001275","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

叶面积指数(Leaf Area Index, LAI)是一个重要的生物物理指标,为研究冠层活力和水分利用提供了有价值的信息。准确的LAI估算对于作物监测和作物产量预测至关重要。本研究评估了不同机器学习(ML)算法在估计印度Roorkee田间试验中获得的LAI的有效性,该试验在两种灌溉技术和三种氮水平下种植水稻。LAI是用亮度计测量的,图像是由无人机(UAV)机载多光谱传感器捕获的。采用多元线性回归(MLR)、Ridge回归(Ridge Regression)、Lasso回归(Lasso Regression)、弹性网回归(Elastic Net Regression)、极限梯度增强回归(XGBoosting)、支持向量机(SVM)、k近邻(KNN)、人工神经网络(ANN)和随机森林(Random Forest)等20种植被指数构建了9个ML模型。在本研究使用的植被指数中,ENDVI和EG与LAI的正相关程度最高(r = 0.68)。其他植被指数如NDVI、ARVI、OSAVI和NDI也与LAI值呈正相关(r≥0.60)。在模型测试中,MLR(0.74)、Ridge(0.75)、Lasso(0.78)、ElasticNet(0.74)和XGBoosting(0.77)模型的R2值较低,而KNN(0.82)、SVM(0.84)、ANN(0.83)和RF(0.80)模型的R2值较好。总体而言,SVM在预测不同处理下水稻LAI方面优于其他ML算法。我们的研究表明,基于无人机的多光谱图像与ML算法相结合,能够以合理的精度产生水稻的LAI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Intercomparison of machine learning models for estimating leaf area index of rice using UAV-based multispectral imagery

Intercomparison of machine learning models for estimating leaf area index of rice using UAV-based multispectral imagery
Leaf Area Index (LAI) serves as a crucial biophysical indicator, providing valuable insights into canopy vigor and water use. Accurate LAI estimation is essential for crop monitoring, and crop yield prediction. The present study assessed the efficacy of different machine learning (ML) algorithms in estimating LAI obtained from field experiment conducted in Roorkee, India, where rice was grown under two irrigation techniques, and three nitrogen levels. LAI was measured using a ceptometer and images were captured from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-borne multispectral sensor. Nine ML models were built using 20 vegetation indices, which included Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Ridge Regression, Lasso Regression, Elastic Net Regression, Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression (XGBoosting), Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Random Forest (RF). Among the vegetation indices used in the study, ENDVI and EG showed the highest positive correlation (r = 0.68) with LAI values. Other vegetation indices such as NDVI, ARVI, OSAVI, and NDI also had a positive correlation (r ≥ 0.60) with LAI values. During model testing, lower R2 values were recorded for MLR (0.74), Ridge (0.75), Lasso (0.78), ElasticNet (0.74), and XGBoosting (0.77) models, while KNN (0.82), SVM (0.84), ANN (0.83), and RF (0.80) models performed better. Overall, the SVM outperformed other ML algorithms in predicting the LAI of rice under different treatments. Our study demonstrated that UAV-based multispectral images coupled with ML algorithms are capable of producing LAI of rice with reasonable accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
176
审稿时长
31.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Physics and Chemistry of the Earth is an international interdisciplinary journal for the rapid publication of collections of refereed communications in separate thematic issues, either stemming from scientific meetings, or, especially compiled for the occasion. There is no restriction on the length of articles published in the journal. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth incorporates the separate Parts A, B and C which existed until the end of 2001. Please note: the Editors are unable to consider submissions that are not invited or linked to a thematic issue. Please do not submit unsolicited papers. The journal covers the following subject areas: -Solid Earth and Geodesy: (geology, geochemistry, tectonophysics, seismology, volcanology, palaeomagnetism and rock magnetism, electromagnetism and potential fields, marine and environmental geosciences as well as geodesy). -Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere: (hydrology and water resources research, engineering and management, oceanography and oceanic chemistry, shelf, sea, lake and river sciences, meteorology and atmospheric sciences incl. chemistry as well as climatology and glaciology). -Solar-Terrestrial and Planetary Science: (solar, heliospheric and solar-planetary sciences, geology, geophysics and atmospheric sciences of planets, satellites and small bodies as well as cosmochemistry and exobiology).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信