{"title":"不同产碳酸酐菌固存CO2的比较及机理","authors":"Yaya Yuan , Chunxiang Qian","doi":"10.1016/j.bej.2025.109812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the rapid emission of CO<sub>2</sub> accelerating global warming, CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage has attracted wide attention due to its huge storage site and safe long-term storage capacity. Carbonic anhydrase (CA) can accelerate CO<sub>2</sub> hydration reaction and promote calcium carbonate precipitation. However, CA has poor thermal stability and high purification cost, so it is necessary to directly use CA producing bacteria for CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage under high temperature environment. In this paper, CA-producing bacterial strains resistant to medium and high temperature was screened from geological saline aquifers and compared with <em>Bacillus mucilaginosus</em> to reveal the reason for its resistance to medium and high temperature. Subsequently, the CO<sub>2</sub> dissolution sequestration capabilities of the two strains were explored at different temperatures. At 50℃, the CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration capacity of <em>Bacillus licheniformis</em> S5 was the highest, and reached 127 mM after 10 days of reaction, which was 26.8 % and 24.9 % higher than that of <em>B. licheniformis</em> CICC 10101 and <em>B. mucilaginosus</em>. Ultimately, the CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration mechanism of different CA-producing bacteria was analyzed. Under high temperature conditions, the enzyme activity of the unit-living bacteria of <em>B. licheniformis</em> S5 was higher, which was more conducive to the conversion of CO<sub>2</sub> into ionic state. This study provides theoretical support for CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration in some medium and high temperature scenarios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8766,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Engineering Journal","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 109812"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison and mechanism of CO2 sequestration by different carbonic anhydrase producing bacteria\",\"authors\":\"Yaya Yuan , Chunxiang Qian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bej.2025.109812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With the rapid emission of CO<sub>2</sub> accelerating global warming, CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage has attracted wide attention due to its huge storage site and safe long-term storage capacity. Carbonic anhydrase (CA) can accelerate CO<sub>2</sub> hydration reaction and promote calcium carbonate precipitation. However, CA has poor thermal stability and high purification cost, so it is necessary to directly use CA producing bacteria for CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage under high temperature environment. In this paper, CA-producing bacterial strains resistant to medium and high temperature was screened from geological saline aquifers and compared with <em>Bacillus mucilaginosus</em> to reveal the reason for its resistance to medium and high temperature. Subsequently, the CO<sub>2</sub> dissolution sequestration capabilities of the two strains were explored at different temperatures. At 50℃, the CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration capacity of <em>Bacillus licheniformis</em> S5 was the highest, and reached 127 mM after 10 days of reaction, which was 26.8 % and 24.9 % higher than that of <em>B. licheniformis</em> CICC 10101 and <em>B. mucilaginosus</em>. Ultimately, the CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration mechanism of different CA-producing bacteria was analyzed. Under high temperature conditions, the enzyme activity of the unit-living bacteria of <em>B. licheniformis</em> S5 was higher, which was more conducive to the conversion of CO<sub>2</sub> into ionic state. This study provides theoretical support for CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration in some medium and high temperature scenarios.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochemical Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"222 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109812\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochemical Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369703X2500186X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369703X2500186X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison and mechanism of CO2 sequestration by different carbonic anhydrase producing bacteria
With the rapid emission of CO2 accelerating global warming, CO2 geological storage has attracted wide attention due to its huge storage site and safe long-term storage capacity. Carbonic anhydrase (CA) can accelerate CO2 hydration reaction and promote calcium carbonate precipitation. However, CA has poor thermal stability and high purification cost, so it is necessary to directly use CA producing bacteria for CO2 geological storage under high temperature environment. In this paper, CA-producing bacterial strains resistant to medium and high temperature was screened from geological saline aquifers and compared with Bacillus mucilaginosus to reveal the reason for its resistance to medium and high temperature. Subsequently, the CO2 dissolution sequestration capabilities of the two strains were explored at different temperatures. At 50℃, the CO2 sequestration capacity of Bacillus licheniformis S5 was the highest, and reached 127 mM after 10 days of reaction, which was 26.8 % and 24.9 % higher than that of B. licheniformis CICC 10101 and B. mucilaginosus. Ultimately, the CO2 sequestration mechanism of different CA-producing bacteria was analyzed. Under high temperature conditions, the enzyme activity of the unit-living bacteria of B. licheniformis S5 was higher, which was more conducive to the conversion of CO2 into ionic state. This study provides theoretical support for CO2 sequestration in some medium and high temperature scenarios.
期刊介绍:
The Biochemical Engineering Journal aims to promote progress in the crucial chemical engineering aspects of the development of biological processes associated with everything from raw materials preparation to product recovery relevant to industries as diverse as medical/healthcare, industrial biotechnology, and environmental biotechnology.
The Journal welcomes full length original research papers, short communications, and review papers* in the following research fields:
Biocatalysis (enzyme or microbial) and biotransformations, including immobilized biocatalyst preparation and kinetics
Biosensors and Biodevices including biofabrication and novel fuel cell development
Bioseparations including scale-up and protein refolding/renaturation
Environmental Bioengineering including bioconversion, bioremediation, and microbial fuel cells
Bioreactor Systems including characterization, optimization and scale-up
Bioresources and Biorefinery Engineering including biomass conversion, biofuels, bioenergy, and optimization
Industrial Biotechnology including specialty chemicals, platform chemicals and neutraceuticals
Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering including bioartificial organs, cell encapsulation, and controlled release
Cell Culture Engineering (plant, animal or insect cells) including viral vectors, monoclonal antibodies, recombinant proteins, vaccines, and secondary metabolites
Cell Therapies and Stem Cells including pluripotent, mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cells; immunotherapies; tissue-specific differentiation; and cryopreservation
Metabolic Engineering, Systems and Synthetic Biology including OMICS, bioinformatics, in silico biology, and metabolic flux analysis
Protein Engineering including enzyme engineering and directed evolution.