Alexandra K. Emmendorfer , Bernadette M. Jansma , Sonja A. Kotz , Milene Bonte
{"title":"阅读困难和典型读者对语音和时间规律的神经生理反应","authors":"Alexandra K. Emmendorfer , Bernadette M. Jansma , Sonja A. Kotz , Milene Bonte","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Sensitivity to sublexical speech features is important for successful reading development. Here we assessed the processing of formal (phonological) and temporal (syllable stress) sublexical speech regularities in typical and dyslexic readers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We tested Dutch-speaking, typical and dyslexic adult readers in a passive EEG oddball paradigm, manipulating phonotactic probability (formal) and syllable stress (temporal) in Dutch pseudowords. We assessed the mismatch negativity (MMN) as a marker for experience-dependent change detection, as well as the associated phase-reset in the theta frequency band.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both deviant types elicited an MMN. Dyslexic readers exhibited reduced neural sensitivity to phonotactic, but not to stress regularities. Time-frequency analyses suggest distinct processes underlying change detection for different deviant types, with increased delta/theta inter-trial coherence (ITC) for formal deviants, which was enhanced in dyslexic readers, and a decrease for temporal deviants, which did not differ between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Results suggest atypical sensitivity to phonological but not temporal speech regularities in dyslexic readers, and distinct oscillatory correlates underlying change detection for different deviant types.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>This is the first study to simultaneously assess neural sensitivity to phonological and temporal regularities in Dutch adult dyslexic readers and highlights distinct change detection for different sublexical features.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 2110772"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurophysiological responses to phonological and temporal regularities in speech in dyslexic and typical readers\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra K. Emmendorfer , Bernadette M. Jansma , Sonja A. Kotz , Milene Bonte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Sensitivity to sublexical speech features is important for successful reading development. Here we assessed the processing of formal (phonological) and temporal (syllable stress) sublexical speech regularities in typical and dyslexic readers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We tested Dutch-speaking, typical and dyslexic adult readers in a passive EEG oddball paradigm, manipulating phonotactic probability (formal) and syllable stress (temporal) in Dutch pseudowords. We assessed the mismatch negativity (MMN) as a marker for experience-dependent change detection, as well as the associated phase-reset in the theta frequency band.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both deviant types elicited an MMN. Dyslexic readers exhibited reduced neural sensitivity to phonotactic, but not to stress regularities. Time-frequency analyses suggest distinct processes underlying change detection for different deviant types, with increased delta/theta inter-trial coherence (ITC) for formal deviants, which was enhanced in dyslexic readers, and a decrease for temporal deviants, which did not differ between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Results suggest atypical sensitivity to phonological but not temporal speech regularities in dyslexic readers, and distinct oscillatory correlates underlying change detection for different deviant types.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>This is the first study to simultaneously assess neural sensitivity to phonological and temporal regularities in Dutch adult dyslexic readers and highlights distinct change detection for different sublexical features.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"176 \",\"pages\":\"Article 2110772\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245725006248\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245725006248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Neurophysiological responses to phonological and temporal regularities in speech in dyslexic and typical readers
Objective
Sensitivity to sublexical speech features is important for successful reading development. Here we assessed the processing of formal (phonological) and temporal (syllable stress) sublexical speech regularities in typical and dyslexic readers.
Methods
We tested Dutch-speaking, typical and dyslexic adult readers in a passive EEG oddball paradigm, manipulating phonotactic probability (formal) and syllable stress (temporal) in Dutch pseudowords. We assessed the mismatch negativity (MMN) as a marker for experience-dependent change detection, as well as the associated phase-reset in the theta frequency band.
Results
Both deviant types elicited an MMN. Dyslexic readers exhibited reduced neural sensitivity to phonotactic, but not to stress regularities. Time-frequency analyses suggest distinct processes underlying change detection for different deviant types, with increased delta/theta inter-trial coherence (ITC) for formal deviants, which was enhanced in dyslexic readers, and a decrease for temporal deviants, which did not differ between groups.
Conclusion
Results suggest atypical sensitivity to phonological but not temporal speech regularities in dyslexic readers, and distinct oscillatory correlates underlying change detection for different deviant types.
Significance
This is the first study to simultaneously assess neural sensitivity to phonological and temporal regularities in Dutch adult dyslexic readers and highlights distinct change detection for different sublexical features.
期刊介绍:
As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology.
Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.