一种无创加速定量MR技术鉴别催乳素瘤的耐药性:早期结果

Rong Lu , Tingfang Hwang , Kaibo Tang , Qing Li , Caixia Fu , Ying-Hua Chu , Shangxuan Shi , Tobias Kober , Tom Hibert , Bin Lu , Yiming Li , Yao Lu , Weijun Tang , Lijin Ji
{"title":"一种无创加速定量MR技术鉴别催乳素瘤的耐药性:早期结果","authors":"Rong Lu ,&nbsp;Tingfang Hwang ,&nbsp;Kaibo Tang ,&nbsp;Qing Li ,&nbsp;Caixia Fu ,&nbsp;Ying-Hua Chu ,&nbsp;Shangxuan Shi ,&nbsp;Tobias Kober ,&nbsp;Tom Hibert ,&nbsp;Bin Lu ,&nbsp;Yiming Li ,&nbsp;Yao Lu ,&nbsp;Weijun Tang ,&nbsp;Lijin Ji","doi":"10.1016/j.bmt.2025.100086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Management of dopamine agonist (DA) resistance in prolactinoma (PRLoma) remains challenging due to the lack of detecting approach and reliable imaging marker. In this cross-sectional study, PRLoma patients were recruited prospectively from a single-center outpatient clinic from May 2024 to September 2024. A noninvasive accelerated quantitative MR technique (GRAPPATINI, GeneRalized Autocalibrating Partially Parallel Acquisitions acceleraTed T2 mappINg) was applied to investigate the correlation between quantitative T2 values and DA resistance. The T2 values of tumors with multiple echo times (TEs) and signal intensity (SI) ratios were analyzed. A total of 30 participants were included, of which 20 were DA-sensitive and 10 were DA-resistant. The T2 values were significantly lower in DA-resistant PRLoma than those in DA-sensitive PRLoma (76.85 ​± ​29.84 ​ms vs 135.88 ​± ​69.86 ​ms, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.0048), whereas the T2 SI ratio revealed no significant difference. The area under the curve (AUC) of T2 values and T2 SI ratio for distinguishing DA sensitivity were 0.850 and 0.668, respectively. The ratio distributions at different TEs (TE10 ​ms, TE38 ​ms, TE42 ​ms, TE55 ​ms, and TE90 ​ms) were significantly different at TE38 ​ms (<em>P</em> ​= ​0.026) between two groups. The AUC of T2 values and TEs for DA sensitivity in PRLoma were 0.850 (T2map), 0.680 (TE10 ​ms), 0.730 (TE38 ​ms), 0.690 (TE42 ​ms), 0.520 (TE55 ​ms), and 0.670 (TE90 ​ms), respectively (<em>P</em> ​= ​0.0107). These findings highlight the translational potential of T2 values as a promising imaging biomarker for evaluating DA resistance in PRLoma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100180,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Technology","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100086"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A noninvasive accelerated quantitative MR technique to distinguish drug resistance in prolactinomas: Early results\",\"authors\":\"Rong Lu ,&nbsp;Tingfang Hwang ,&nbsp;Kaibo Tang ,&nbsp;Qing Li ,&nbsp;Caixia Fu ,&nbsp;Ying-Hua Chu ,&nbsp;Shangxuan Shi ,&nbsp;Tobias Kober ,&nbsp;Tom Hibert ,&nbsp;Bin Lu ,&nbsp;Yiming Li ,&nbsp;Yao Lu ,&nbsp;Weijun Tang ,&nbsp;Lijin Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bmt.2025.100086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Management of dopamine agonist (DA) resistance in prolactinoma (PRLoma) remains challenging due to the lack of detecting approach and reliable imaging marker. In this cross-sectional study, PRLoma patients were recruited prospectively from a single-center outpatient clinic from May 2024 to September 2024. A noninvasive accelerated quantitative MR technique (GRAPPATINI, GeneRalized Autocalibrating Partially Parallel Acquisitions acceleraTed T2 mappINg) was applied to investigate the correlation between quantitative T2 values and DA resistance. The T2 values of tumors with multiple echo times (TEs) and signal intensity (SI) ratios were analyzed. A total of 30 participants were included, of which 20 were DA-sensitive and 10 were DA-resistant. The T2 values were significantly lower in DA-resistant PRLoma than those in DA-sensitive PRLoma (76.85 ​± ​29.84 ​ms vs 135.88 ​± ​69.86 ​ms, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.0048), whereas the T2 SI ratio revealed no significant difference. The area under the curve (AUC) of T2 values and T2 SI ratio for distinguishing DA sensitivity were 0.850 and 0.668, respectively. The ratio distributions at different TEs (TE10 ​ms, TE38 ​ms, TE42 ​ms, TE55 ​ms, and TE90 ​ms) were significantly different at TE38 ​ms (<em>P</em> ​= ​0.026) between two groups. The AUC of T2 values and TEs for DA sensitivity in PRLoma were 0.850 (T2map), 0.680 (TE10 ​ms), 0.730 (TE38 ​ms), 0.690 (TE42 ​ms), 0.520 (TE55 ​ms), and 0.670 (TE90 ​ms), respectively (<em>P</em> ​= ​0.0107). These findings highlight the translational potential of T2 values as a promising imaging biomarker for evaluating DA resistance in PRLoma.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Technology\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100086\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949723X25000182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949723X25000182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于缺乏检测方法和可靠的成像标记,催乳素瘤(proloma)患者多巴胺激动剂(DA)耐药性的管理仍然具有挑战性。在这项横断面研究中,从2024年5月至2024年9月的单中心门诊诊所前瞻性地招募了proma患者。采用无创加速定量MR技术(GRAPPATINI,广义自校准部分平行采集加速T2映射)研究定量T2值与DA电阻之间的相关性。分析肿瘤多次回波时间(TEs)和信号强度(SI)比值的T2值。共纳入30例受试者,其中da敏感20例,da耐药10例。da耐药PRLoma的T2值明显低于da敏感PRLoma(76.85±29.84 ms vs 135.88±69.86 ms, P = 0.0048),而T2 SI比值无显著差异。T2值和T2 SI比值的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.850和0.668。两组在TE10 ms、TE38 ms、TE42 ms、TE55 ms和TE90 ms时的比值分布在TE38 ms时差异有统计学意义(P = 0.026)。前列腺癌DA敏感性的T2值和TEs的AUC分别为0.850 (T2map)、0.680 (TE10 ms)、0.730 (TE38 ms)、0.690 (TE42 ms)、0.520 (TE55 ms)和0.670 (TE90 ms) (P = 0.0107)。这些发现强调了T2值作为评估前列腺增生瘤DA耐药性的有希望的成像生物标志物的转化潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A noninvasive accelerated quantitative MR technique to distinguish drug resistance in prolactinomas: Early results
Management of dopamine agonist (DA) resistance in prolactinoma (PRLoma) remains challenging due to the lack of detecting approach and reliable imaging marker. In this cross-sectional study, PRLoma patients were recruited prospectively from a single-center outpatient clinic from May 2024 to September 2024. A noninvasive accelerated quantitative MR technique (GRAPPATINI, GeneRalized Autocalibrating Partially Parallel Acquisitions acceleraTed T2 mappINg) was applied to investigate the correlation between quantitative T2 values and DA resistance. The T2 values of tumors with multiple echo times (TEs) and signal intensity (SI) ratios were analyzed. A total of 30 participants were included, of which 20 were DA-sensitive and 10 were DA-resistant. The T2 values were significantly lower in DA-resistant PRLoma than those in DA-sensitive PRLoma (76.85 ​± ​29.84 ​ms vs 135.88 ​± ​69.86 ​ms, P ​= ​0.0048), whereas the T2 SI ratio revealed no significant difference. The area under the curve (AUC) of T2 values and T2 SI ratio for distinguishing DA sensitivity were 0.850 and 0.668, respectively. The ratio distributions at different TEs (TE10 ​ms, TE38 ​ms, TE42 ​ms, TE55 ​ms, and TE90 ​ms) were significantly different at TE38 ​ms (P ​= ​0.026) between two groups. The AUC of T2 values and TEs for DA sensitivity in PRLoma were 0.850 (T2map), 0.680 (TE10 ​ms), 0.730 (TE38 ​ms), 0.690 (TE42 ​ms), 0.520 (TE55 ​ms), and 0.670 (TE90 ​ms), respectively (P ​= ​0.0107). These findings highlight the translational potential of T2 values as a promising imaging biomarker for evaluating DA resistance in PRLoma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信