规范欧洲平衡市场竞价过滤中的TSO互动

IF 9.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Marie Girod , Viktor Terrier , Virginie Dussartre , Jean-Yves Bourmaud , Yannick Perez , Benjamin Donnot
{"title":"规范欧洲平衡市场竞价过滤中的TSO互动","authors":"Marie Girod ,&nbsp;Viktor Terrier ,&nbsp;Virginie Dussartre ,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Bourmaud ,&nbsp;Yannick Perez ,&nbsp;Benjamin Donnot","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Europe is undertaking projects for near real-time common balancing markets to meet the flexibility needs induced by renewable deployment. A new congestion management method, bid filtering, has been authorized by regulation to prevent unsolvable last minute congestion. It is designed to manage internal congestion and is performed by each Transmission System Operator (TSO) separately without knowledge of bids in other zones. Bids from all zones are shared in the same market, which means filtering from one TSO could affect welfare in other zones, depending on its objective and on regulation. This paper evaluates the potential effects of multiple TSOs interacting with different filtering strategies. Three TSO strategies are considered – Benevolent, Local, and Conservative – and different combinations are tested using multi-agent reinforcement learning. Results show that although several TSOs filtering benevolently leads to the highest net Social Welfare, it is unlikely that all TSOs will adopt this strategy considering political and social constraints in EU27 countries. We discuss several regulatory options to create the conditions for a Social Welfare-maximizing filtering and foster coordination between TSOs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 114713"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulating TSO interaction in bid filtering for European balancing markets\",\"authors\":\"Marie Girod ,&nbsp;Viktor Terrier ,&nbsp;Virginie Dussartre ,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Bourmaud ,&nbsp;Yannick Perez ,&nbsp;Benjamin Donnot\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Europe is undertaking projects for near real-time common balancing markets to meet the flexibility needs induced by renewable deployment. A new congestion management method, bid filtering, has been authorized by regulation to prevent unsolvable last minute congestion. It is designed to manage internal congestion and is performed by each Transmission System Operator (TSO) separately without knowledge of bids in other zones. Bids from all zones are shared in the same market, which means filtering from one TSO could affect welfare in other zones, depending on its objective and on regulation. This paper evaluates the potential effects of multiple TSOs interacting with different filtering strategies. Three TSO strategies are considered – Benevolent, Local, and Conservative – and different combinations are tested using multi-agent reinforcement learning. Results show that although several TSOs filtering benevolently leads to the highest net Social Welfare, it is unlikely that all TSOs will adopt this strategy considering political and social constraints in EU27 countries. We discuss several regulatory options to create the conditions for a Social Welfare-maximizing filtering and foster coordination between TSOs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"205 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002204\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002204","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲正在实施近乎实时的共同平衡市场项目,以满足可再生能源部署带来的灵活性需求。为了防止最后一分钟无法解决的拥塞,法规批准了一种新的拥塞管理方法竞价过滤。它旨在管理内部拥塞,由每个传输系统运营商(TSO)单独执行,而不需要了解其他区域的投标情况。来自所有区域的投标在同一个市场上共享,这意味着从一个TSO中过滤可能会影响其他区域的福利,这取决于其目标和监管。本文评估了多个tso与不同过滤策略相互作用的潜在影响。考虑了三种TSO策略-仁慈,局部和保守-并使用多智能体强化学习测试了不同的组合。结果表明,尽管一些tso仁慈地过滤导致最高的净社会福利,但考虑到欧盟27国的政治和社会约束,不太可能所有tso都采用这一策略。我们讨论了几种监管选择,以创造社会福利最大化过滤的条件,并促进TSOs之间的协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regulating TSO interaction in bid filtering for European balancing markets
Europe is undertaking projects for near real-time common balancing markets to meet the flexibility needs induced by renewable deployment. A new congestion management method, bid filtering, has been authorized by regulation to prevent unsolvable last minute congestion. It is designed to manage internal congestion and is performed by each Transmission System Operator (TSO) separately without knowledge of bids in other zones. Bids from all zones are shared in the same market, which means filtering from one TSO could affect welfare in other zones, depending on its objective and on regulation. This paper evaluates the potential effects of multiple TSOs interacting with different filtering strategies. Three TSO strategies are considered – Benevolent, Local, and Conservative – and different combinations are tested using multi-agent reinforcement learning. Results show that although several TSOs filtering benevolently leads to the highest net Social Welfare, it is unlikely that all TSOs will adopt this strategy considering political and social constraints in EU27 countries. We discuss several regulatory options to create the conditions for a Social Welfare-maximizing filtering and foster coordination between TSOs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信