Kristina Wendl, Martin Knebusch, Bernhard Hörmann, Christian Eimer, Thomas Borgmann, Hannes Egermann, Tino Münster
{"title":"预防动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后血管痉挛的两种标准化方案的比较分析：一项回顾性试点研究。","authors":"Kristina Wendl, Martin Knebusch, Bernhard Hörmann, Christian Eimer, Thomas Borgmann, Hannes Egermann, Tino Münster","doi":"10.1097/EA9.0000000000000073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebral vasospasm is a major complication after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Yet, no standardised applicable therapy regimen has been established so far. Most previous studies concentrated on comparing single drugs, while fewer holistic therapeutic approaches have been compared.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to compare two therapy bundles with different administrations of magnesium, catecholamines, nimodipine and molsidomine, regarding the prevention of cerebral vasospasm and neurological outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective design, pilot study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This single-centre trial included 44 patients, 22 patients per group (matched pairs), with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage treated in the hospital of Barmherzige Brüder in Regensburg, Germany, from 2015 to 2022. Exclusion criteria were known comorbidities, such as severe liver, blood or kidney diseases.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Incidence of vasospasm, survival and clinical outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of vasospasms showed no significant difference between group 1 (new therapy bundle) and group 2 (previous standard therapy, <i>P</i> = 0.34), as well as the number of surviving patients. Comparing the clinical outcome measured with the Glasgow Outcome Scale after hospitalisation, no significant difference could be seen. The hospital length of stay, group 1: 23 [16.75 to 25.50] days vs. group 2: 30 [22.5 to 34.5] days, <i>P</i> = 0.004, and the intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), group 1: 17.50 [12.75 to 24.00] days vs. group 2: 23.50 [19.75 to 32.50] days, <i>P</i> = 0.012, were significantly shorter in group 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>New therapy bundle has the potential to be more effective than the standard therapy method. As a retrospective pilot study with a small sample size, this research may serve as a valuable foundation for future larger prospective studies for better comparison of the different therapeutic approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":520410,"journal":{"name":"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care","volume":"4 3","pages":"e0073"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122171/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of two standardised protocols for prevention of vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: A retrospective pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Kristina Wendl, Martin Knebusch, Bernhard Hörmann, Christian Eimer, Thomas Borgmann, Hannes Egermann, Tino Münster\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EA9.0000000000000073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebral vasospasm is a major complication after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Yet, no standardised applicable therapy regimen has been established so far. Most previous studies concentrated on comparing single drugs, while fewer holistic therapeutic approaches have been compared.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to compare two therapy bundles with different administrations of magnesium, catecholamines, nimodipine and molsidomine, regarding the prevention of cerebral vasospasm and neurological outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective design, pilot study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This single-centre trial included 44 patients, 22 patients per group (matched pairs), with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage treated in the hospital of Barmherzige Brüder in Regensburg, Germany, from 2015 to 2022. Exclusion criteria were known comorbidities, such as severe liver, blood or kidney diseases.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Incidence of vasospasm, survival and clinical outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of vasospasms showed no significant difference between group 1 (new therapy bundle) and group 2 (previous standard therapy, <i>P</i> = 0.34), as well as the number of surviving patients. Comparing the clinical outcome measured with the Glasgow Outcome Scale after hospitalisation, no significant difference could be seen. The hospital length of stay, group 1: 23 [16.75 to 25.50] days vs. group 2: 30 [22.5 to 34.5] days, <i>P</i> = 0.004, and the intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), group 1: 17.50 [12.75 to 24.00] days vs. group 2: 23.50 [19.75 to 32.50] days, <i>P</i> = 0.012, were significantly shorter in group 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>New therapy bundle has the potential to be more effective than the standard therapy method. As a retrospective pilot study with a small sample size, this research may serve as a valuable foundation for future larger prospective studies for better comparison of the different therapeutic approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"e0073\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122171/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EA9.0000000000000073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EA9.0000000000000073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative analysis of two standardised protocols for prevention of vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: A retrospective pilot study.
Background: Cerebral vasospasm is a major complication after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Yet, no standardised applicable therapy regimen has been established so far. Most previous studies concentrated on comparing single drugs, while fewer holistic therapeutic approaches have been compared.
Objective: Our objective was to compare two therapy bundles with different administrations of magnesium, catecholamines, nimodipine and molsidomine, regarding the prevention of cerebral vasospasm and neurological outcome after subarachnoid haemorrhage.
Design: Retrospective design, pilot study.
Setting: This single-centre trial included 44 patients, 22 patients per group (matched pairs), with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage treated in the hospital of Barmherzige Brüder in Regensburg, Germany, from 2015 to 2022. Exclusion criteria were known comorbidities, such as severe liver, blood or kidney diseases.
Main outcome measures: Incidence of vasospasm, survival and clinical outcome.
Results: The incidence of vasospasms showed no significant difference between group 1 (new therapy bundle) and group 2 (previous standard therapy, P = 0.34), as well as the number of surviving patients. Comparing the clinical outcome measured with the Glasgow Outcome Scale after hospitalisation, no significant difference could be seen. The hospital length of stay, group 1: 23 [16.75 to 25.50] days vs. group 2: 30 [22.5 to 34.5] days, P = 0.004, and the intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), group 1: 17.50 [12.75 to 24.00] days vs. group 2: 23.50 [19.75 to 32.50] days, P = 0.012, were significantly shorter in group 1.
Conclusion: New therapy bundle has the potential to be more effective than the standard therapy method. As a retrospective pilot study with a small sample size, this research may serve as a valuable foundation for future larger prospective studies for better comparison of the different therapeutic approaches.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
