比较两种双组份下肢压缩系统的绷带下压力和刚度动态:技术水平和部分压缩层添加的影响。

IF 1.5
Sarah Moonen, Tessa De Vrieze, Erik Fransen, Lot Demuynck, Hanne Verbelen, Jill Meirte, Ulrike Van Daele, Nick Gebruers
{"title":"比较两种双组份下肢压缩系统的绷带下压力和刚度动态:技术水平和部分压缩层添加的影响。","authors":"Sarah Moonen, Tessa De Vrieze, Erik Fransen, Lot Demuynck, Hanne Verbelen, Jill Meirte, Ulrike Van Daele, Nick Gebruers","doi":"10.1177/02683555251347057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundTwo-component cohesive compression systems are available for compression therapy.ObjectivesTo assess the sub-bandage pressure and stiffness of the two-component compression systems, Coban and CoFlex, and to investigate how an additional partial compression layer after two hours and the experience of the therapist impact these outcomes.MethodsThe study examined 19 patients whose lower limbs were bandaged by either a trainee or an experienced physical therapist. Sub-bandage pressures were measured using PicoPress® sensors placed 10 cm and 25 cm proximal to the medial malleolus. Additionally, the Static Stiffness Index (SSI) and Dynamic Stiffness Index (DSI) were calculated.ResultsThe addition of a partial compression layer on the ventral side of the leg significantly increased sub-bandage pressure and DSI. SSI effects were significant at 10 cm, but not at 25 cm height. Coban generated significantly higher pressures than CoFlex, while the level of experience of the therapist showed no significant influence.ConclusionsThe addition of a partial compression layer effectively increases sub-bandage pressure, with Coban exerting higher pressure than CoFlex. However, the level of experience of the therapist does not significantly influence the compression outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555251347057"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Comparing sub-bandage pressure and stiffness dynamics in two two-component compression systems for the lower limb: Influence of skill level and partial compression layer addition\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Moonen, Tessa De Vrieze, Erik Fransen, Lot Demuynck, Hanne Verbelen, Jill Meirte, Ulrike Van Daele, Nick Gebruers\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555251347057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundTwo-component cohesive compression systems are available for compression therapy.ObjectivesTo assess the sub-bandage pressure and stiffness of the two-component compression systems, Coban and CoFlex, and to investigate how an additional partial compression layer after two hours and the experience of the therapist impact these outcomes.MethodsThe study examined 19 patients whose lower limbs were bandaged by either a trainee or an experienced physical therapist. Sub-bandage pressures were measured using PicoPress® sensors placed 10 cm and 25 cm proximal to the medial malleolus. Additionally, the Static Stiffness Index (SSI) and Dynamic Stiffness Index (DSI) were calculated.ResultsThe addition of a partial compression layer on the ventral side of the leg significantly increased sub-bandage pressure and DSI. SSI effects were significant at 10 cm, but not at 25 cm height. Coban generated significantly higher pressures than CoFlex, while the level of experience of the therapist showed no significant influence.ConclusionsThe addition of a partial compression layer effectively increases sub-bandage pressure, with Coban exerting higher pressure than CoFlex. However, the level of experience of the therapist does not significantly influence the compression outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2683555251347057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251347057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251347057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景双组分内聚压缩系统可用于压缩治疗。目的评估双组分压缩系统Coban和CoFlex的绷带下压力和刚度,并研究两小时后额外的部分压缩层和治疗师的经验如何影响这些结果。方法本研究调查了19例下肢由受训人员或有经验的物理治疗师包扎的患者。使用PicoPress®传感器测量绷带下压力,传感器放置在内踝近端10 cm和25 cm处。此外,还计算了静刚度指数(SSI)和动刚度指数(DSI)。结果在腿腹侧增加部分压迫层可显著增加绷带下压力和DSI。SSI效应在10 cm处显著,但在25 cm处不显著。Coban产生的压力明显高于CoFlex,而治疗师的经验水平没有明显影响。结论局部加压层的加入有效增加了绷带下压力,Coban施加的压力高于CoFlex。然而,治疗师的经验水平并没有显著影响压缩结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Comparing sub-bandage pressure and stiffness dynamics in two two-component compression systems for the lower limb: Influence of skill level and partial compression layer addition".

BackgroundTwo-component cohesive compression systems are available for compression therapy.ObjectivesTo assess the sub-bandage pressure and stiffness of the two-component compression systems, Coban and CoFlex, and to investigate how an additional partial compression layer after two hours and the experience of the therapist impact these outcomes.MethodsThe study examined 19 patients whose lower limbs were bandaged by either a trainee or an experienced physical therapist. Sub-bandage pressures were measured using PicoPress® sensors placed 10 cm and 25 cm proximal to the medial malleolus. Additionally, the Static Stiffness Index (SSI) and Dynamic Stiffness Index (DSI) were calculated.ResultsThe addition of a partial compression layer on the ventral side of the leg significantly increased sub-bandage pressure and DSI. SSI effects were significant at 10 cm, but not at 25 cm height. Coban generated significantly higher pressures than CoFlex, while the level of experience of the therapist showed no significant influence.ConclusionsThe addition of a partial compression layer effectively increases sub-bandage pressure, with Coban exerting higher pressure than CoFlex. However, the level of experience of the therapist does not significantly influence the compression outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信