基于模型的深度学习重构与压缩感知灵敏度编码对心脏MR图像质量和精度评价左心室容量和应变的影响:一项健康志愿者的研究

IF 3.2
Satonori Tsuneta, Satoru Aono, Rina Kimura, Jihun Kwon, Noriyuki Fujima, Kinya Ishizaka, Noriko Nishioka, Masami Yoneyama, Fumi Kato, Kazuyuki Minowa, Kohsuke Kudo
{"title":"基于模型的深度学习重构与压缩感知灵敏度编码对心脏MR图像质量和精度评价左心室容量和应变的影响:一项健康志愿者的研究","authors":"Satonori Tsuneta, Satoru Aono, Rina Kimura, Jihun Kwon, Noriyuki Fujima, Kinya Ishizaka, Noriko Nishioka, Masami Yoneyama, Fumi Kato, Kazuyuki Minowa, Kohsuke Kudo","doi":"10.2463/mrms.mp.2024-0202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of model-based deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) compared with that of compressed sensing-sensitivity encoding (CS) on cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cine CMR images of 10 healthy volunteers were obtained with reduction factors of 2, 4, 6, and 8 and reconstructed using CS and DLR. The visual image quality scores assessed sharpness, image noise, and artifacts. Left-ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), and ejection fraction (EF) were manually measured. LV global circumferential strain (GCS) was automatically measured using the software. The precision of EDV, ESV, SV, EF, and GCS measurements was compared between CS and DLR using Bland-Altman analysis with full-sampling data as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with CS, DLR significantly improved image quality with reduction factors of 6 and 8. The precision of EDV and ESV with a reduction factor of 8, and GCS with reduction factors of 6 and 8 measurements improved with DLR compared with CS, whereas those of SV and EF measurements were not different between DLR and CS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effect of DLR on cine CMR's image quality and precision in evaluating quantitative volume and strain was equal or superior to that of CS. DLR may replace CS for cine CMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":94126,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Model-based Deep-learning Reconstruction Compared with that of Compressed Sensing-Sensitivity Encoding on the Image Quality and Precision of Cine Cardiac MR in Evaluating Left-ventricular Volume and Strain: A Study on Healthy Volunteers.\",\"authors\":\"Satonori Tsuneta, Satoru Aono, Rina Kimura, Jihun Kwon, Noriyuki Fujima, Kinya Ishizaka, Noriko Nishioka, Masami Yoneyama, Fumi Kato, Kazuyuki Minowa, Kohsuke Kudo\",\"doi\":\"10.2463/mrms.mp.2024-0202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of model-based deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) compared with that of compressed sensing-sensitivity encoding (CS) on cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cine CMR images of 10 healthy volunteers were obtained with reduction factors of 2, 4, 6, and 8 and reconstructed using CS and DLR. The visual image quality scores assessed sharpness, image noise, and artifacts. Left-ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), and ejection fraction (EF) were manually measured. LV global circumferential strain (GCS) was automatically measured using the software. The precision of EDV, ESV, SV, EF, and GCS measurements was compared between CS and DLR using Bland-Altman analysis with full-sampling data as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with CS, DLR significantly improved image quality with reduction factors of 6 and 8. The precision of EDV and ESV with a reduction factor of 8, and GCS with reduction factors of 6 and 8 measurements improved with DLR compared with CS, whereas those of SV and EF measurements were not different between DLR and CS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effect of DLR on cine CMR's image quality and precision in evaluating quantitative volume and strain was equal or superior to that of CS. DLR may replace CS for cine CMR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2024-0202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2024-0202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较基于模型的深度学习重构(DLR)与压缩感知敏感性编码(CS)在电影心脏磁共振(CMR)中的效果。方法:获取10名健康志愿者的CMR图像,还原因子分别为2、4、6和8,并采用CS和DLR进行重构。视觉图像质量评分评估了清晰度、图像噪声和伪影。人工测量左室(LV)舒张末期容积(EDV)、收缩末期容积(ESV)、卒中容积(SV)和射血分数(EF)。采用软件自动测量LV整体周向应变(GCS)。采用Bland-Altman分析,以全采样数据为金标准,比较CS和DLR测量EDV、ESV、SV、EF和GCS的精度。结果:与CS相比,DLR显著改善了图像质量,降低因子为6和8。DLR测量的EDV和ESV的还原因子为8,GCS的还原因子为6和8,DLR测量的SV和EF测量的精度与CS相比没有差异。结论:DLR对CMR影像质量和定量体积应变评价精度的影响等于或优于CS。DLR可以代替CS进行CMR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Model-based Deep-learning Reconstruction Compared with that of Compressed Sensing-Sensitivity Encoding on the Image Quality and Precision of Cine Cardiac MR in Evaluating Left-ventricular Volume and Strain: A Study on Healthy Volunteers.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of model-based deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) compared with that of compressed sensing-sensitivity encoding (CS) on cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).

Methods: Cine CMR images of 10 healthy volunteers were obtained with reduction factors of 2, 4, 6, and 8 and reconstructed using CS and DLR. The visual image quality scores assessed sharpness, image noise, and artifacts. Left-ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), and ejection fraction (EF) were manually measured. LV global circumferential strain (GCS) was automatically measured using the software. The precision of EDV, ESV, SV, EF, and GCS measurements was compared between CS and DLR using Bland-Altman analysis with full-sampling data as the gold standard.

Results: Compared with CS, DLR significantly improved image quality with reduction factors of 6 and 8. The precision of EDV and ESV with a reduction factor of 8, and GCS with reduction factors of 6 and 8 measurements improved with DLR compared with CS, whereas those of SV and EF measurements were not different between DLR and CS.

Conclusion: The effect of DLR on cine CMR's image quality and precision in evaluating quantitative volume and strain was equal or superior to that of CS. DLR may replace CS for cine CMR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信