重复反馈有助于7岁儿童在记忆任务中的不确定性监测。

Florian J Buehler, Simona Ghetti, Claudia M Roebers
{"title":"重复反馈有助于7岁儿童在记忆任务中的不确定性监测。","authors":"Florian J Buehler, Simona Ghetti, Claudia M Roebers","doi":"10.1007/s41465-025-00322-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children's ability to accurately monitor their performance is crucial for self-regulated learning and academic achievement, but interventions are rare. We aimed to improve young primary school childrens' (<i>N</i> = 127; <i>M</i> = 7.45 years) uncertainty monitoring with feedback. Participants attended six training sessions in which they received either metacognitive feedback, performance feedback or were assigned to an active control group. In the metacognitive feedback group, children received feedback on the correspondence between their accuracy in a memory task and their uncertainty monitoring (confidence judgments). In the performance feedback group, children received solely feedback on their accuracy in a memory task. In the active control group, children solved attention control tasks. Pre- and post-training, we assessed participants' memory performance in a recognition test and uncertainty monitoring with confidence judgments. Results revealed that metacognitive, but not performance feedback, improved children's uncertainty monitoring from pre- to posttest. However, metacognitive and performance feedback did not improve memory accuracy. The number of required sessions and items per session might be one of the most important aspects to be clarified in future studies.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41465-025-00322-8.</p>","PeriodicalId":73678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice","volume":"9 2","pages":"230-243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repeated Feedback Can Benefit Seven-Year-old's Uncertainty Monitoring in a Memory Task.\",\"authors\":\"Florian J Buehler, Simona Ghetti, Claudia M Roebers\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41465-025-00322-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Children's ability to accurately monitor their performance is crucial for self-regulated learning and academic achievement, but interventions are rare. We aimed to improve young primary school childrens' (<i>N</i> = 127; <i>M</i> = 7.45 years) uncertainty monitoring with feedback. Participants attended six training sessions in which they received either metacognitive feedback, performance feedback or were assigned to an active control group. In the metacognitive feedback group, children received feedback on the correspondence between their accuracy in a memory task and their uncertainty monitoring (confidence judgments). In the performance feedback group, children received solely feedback on their accuracy in a memory task. In the active control group, children solved attention control tasks. Pre- and post-training, we assessed participants' memory performance in a recognition test and uncertainty monitoring with confidence judgments. Results revealed that metacognitive, but not performance feedback, improved children's uncertainty monitoring from pre- to posttest. However, metacognitive and performance feedback did not improve memory accuracy. The number of required sessions and items per session might be one of the most important aspects to be clarified in future studies.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41465-025-00322-8.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"230-243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122647/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-025-00322-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-025-00322-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童准确监控自己表现的能力对于自我调节学习和学业成就至关重要,但干预措施很少。我们的目标是提高小学生(N = 127;M = 7.45年)反馈不确定性监测。参与者参加了六个培训课程,在这些课程中,他们要么接受元认知反馈,要么接受表现反馈,要么被分配到一个积极的对照组。在元认知反馈组中,孩子们收到了关于他们在记忆任务中的准确性和他们的不确定性监测(信心判断)之间的对应关系的反馈。在表现反馈组,孩子们只收到关于记忆任务准确性的反馈。在积极对照组,孩子们解决了注意力控制任务。在训练前和训练后,我们通过识别测试和信心判断的不确定性监测来评估参与者的记忆表现。结果显示,元认知而非表现反馈改善了儿童从测试前到测试后的不确定性监测。然而,元认知和表现反馈并没有提高记忆的准确性。所需会议的数目和每届会议的项目可能是今后研究中需要澄清的最重要方面之一。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1007/s41465-025-00322-8。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Repeated Feedback Can Benefit Seven-Year-old's Uncertainty Monitoring in a Memory Task.

Children's ability to accurately monitor their performance is crucial for self-regulated learning and academic achievement, but interventions are rare. We aimed to improve young primary school childrens' (N = 127; M = 7.45 years) uncertainty monitoring with feedback. Participants attended six training sessions in which they received either metacognitive feedback, performance feedback or were assigned to an active control group. In the metacognitive feedback group, children received feedback on the correspondence between their accuracy in a memory task and their uncertainty monitoring (confidence judgments). In the performance feedback group, children received solely feedback on their accuracy in a memory task. In the active control group, children solved attention control tasks. Pre- and post-training, we assessed participants' memory performance in a recognition test and uncertainty monitoring with confidence judgments. Results revealed that metacognitive, but not performance feedback, improved children's uncertainty monitoring from pre- to posttest. However, metacognitive and performance feedback did not improve memory accuracy. The number of required sessions and items per session might be one of the most important aspects to be clarified in future studies.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41465-025-00322-8.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信