塔拉他单抗在小细胞肺癌铂基化疗后的疗效。

IF 78.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
New England Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-24 Epub Date: 2025-06-02 DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2502099
Giannis Mountzios, Longhua Sun, Byoung Chul Cho, Umut Demirci, Sofia Baka, Mahmut Gümüş, Antonio Lugini, Bo Zhu, Yan Yu, Ippokratis Korantzis, Ji-Youn Han, Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu, Myung-Ju Ahn, Pedro Rocha, Julien Mazières, Sally C M Lau, Martin Schuler, Fiona Blackhall, Tatsuya Yoshida, Taofeek K Owonikoko, Luis Paz-Ares, Tony Jiang, Ali Hamidi, Diana Gauto, Gonzalo Recondo, Charles M Rudin
{"title":"塔拉他单抗在小细胞肺癌铂基化疗后的疗效。","authors":"Giannis Mountzios, Longhua Sun, Byoung Chul Cho, Umut Demirci, Sofia Baka, Mahmut Gümüş, Antonio Lugini, Bo Zhu, Yan Yu, Ippokratis Korantzis, Ji-Youn Han, Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu, Myung-Ju Ahn, Pedro Rocha, Julien Mazières, Sally C M Lau, Martin Schuler, Fiona Blackhall, Tatsuya Yoshida, Taofeek K Owonikoko, Luis Paz-Ares, Tony Jiang, Ali Hamidi, Diana Gauto, Gonzalo Recondo, Charles M Rudin","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2502099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tarlatamab, a bispecific delta-like ligand 3-directed T-cell engager immunotherapy, received accelerated approval for the treatment of patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer. Whether tarlatamab is more effective than chemotherapy in the treatment of patients whose small-cell lung cancer has progressed during or after initial platinum-based chemotherapy is not known.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multinational, phase 3, open-label trial to compare tarlatamab with chemotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with small-cell lung cancer whose disease had progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive tarlatamab or chemotherapy (topotecan, lurbinectedin, or amrubicin). The primary end point was overall survival. Key secondary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival and patient-reported outcomes. Results of the prespecified interim analysis (data-cutoff date, January 29, 2025) are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 509 patients were randomly assigned to receive tarlatamab (254 patients) or chemotherapy (255 patients). Treatment with tarlatamab resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy (median, 13.6 months [95% confidence interval {CI}, 11.1 to not reached] vs. 8.3 months [95% CI, 7.0 to 10.2]; stratified hazard ratio for death, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.77; P<0.001). Tarlatamab treatment also had a significant benefit with respect to progression-free survival and cancer-related dyspnea and cough as compared with chemotherapy. The incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was lower with tarlatamab than with chemotherapy (54% vs. 80%), as was the incidence of adverse events resulting in treatment discontinuation (5% vs. 12%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment with tarlatamab led to longer overall survival than chemotherapy among patients with small-cell lung cancer whose disease had progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. (Funded by Amgen; DeLLphi-304 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05740566.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"349-361"},"PeriodicalIF":78.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tarlatamab in Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Giannis Mountzios, Longhua Sun, Byoung Chul Cho, Umut Demirci, Sofia Baka, Mahmut Gümüş, Antonio Lugini, Bo Zhu, Yan Yu, Ippokratis Korantzis, Ji-Youn Han, Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu, Myung-Ju Ahn, Pedro Rocha, Julien Mazières, Sally C M Lau, Martin Schuler, Fiona Blackhall, Tatsuya Yoshida, Taofeek K Owonikoko, Luis Paz-Ares, Tony Jiang, Ali Hamidi, Diana Gauto, Gonzalo Recondo, Charles M Rudin\",\"doi\":\"10.1056/NEJMoa2502099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tarlatamab, a bispecific delta-like ligand 3-directed T-cell engager immunotherapy, received accelerated approval for the treatment of patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer. Whether tarlatamab is more effective than chemotherapy in the treatment of patients whose small-cell lung cancer has progressed during or after initial platinum-based chemotherapy is not known.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multinational, phase 3, open-label trial to compare tarlatamab with chemotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with small-cell lung cancer whose disease had progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive tarlatamab or chemotherapy (topotecan, lurbinectedin, or amrubicin). The primary end point was overall survival. Key secondary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival and patient-reported outcomes. Results of the prespecified interim analysis (data-cutoff date, January 29, 2025) are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 509 patients were randomly assigned to receive tarlatamab (254 patients) or chemotherapy (255 patients). Treatment with tarlatamab resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy (median, 13.6 months [95% confidence interval {CI}, 11.1 to not reached] vs. 8.3 months [95% CI, 7.0 to 10.2]; stratified hazard ratio for death, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.77; P<0.001). Tarlatamab treatment also had a significant benefit with respect to progression-free survival and cancer-related dyspnea and cough as compared with chemotherapy. The incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was lower with tarlatamab than with chemotherapy (54% vs. 80%), as was the incidence of adverse events resulting in treatment discontinuation (5% vs. 12%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment with tarlatamab led to longer overall survival than chemotherapy among patients with small-cell lung cancer whose disease had progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. (Funded by Amgen; DeLLphi-304 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05740566.).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"349-361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":78.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2502099\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2502099","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Tarlatamab是一种双特异性δ样配体3定向t细胞参与免疫疗法,已获得加速批准用于治疗先前治疗过的小细胞肺癌患者。对于在初始铂基化疗期间或之后发生进展的小细胞肺癌患者,塔拉他单抗是否比化疗更有效尚不清楚。方法:我们进行了一项多国iii期开放标签试验,比较塔拉他单抗与化疗作为二线治疗在铂基化疗期间或之后疾病进展的小细胞肺癌患者。患者被随机分配接受塔拉他单抗或化疗(拓扑替康、鲁比奈定或氨柔比星)。主要终点为总生存期。关键的次要终点是研究者评估的无进展生存期和患者报告的结局。报告了预先规定的中期分析结果(数据截止日期为2025年1月29日)。结果:共有509例患者被随机分配接受塔拉他单抗(254例)或化疗(255例)。tarlatamab治疗的总生存期明显长于化疗(中位数,13.6个月[95%可信区间{CI}, 11.1至未达到]vs. 8.3个月[95% CI, 7.0至10.2];分层死亡风险比为0.60;95% CI, 0.47 ~ 0.77;结论:在铂基化疗期间或之后疾病进展的小细胞肺癌患者中,tarlatamab治疗比化疗的总生存期更长。(安进资助;delphi -304 ClinicalTrials.gov号码,NCT05740566)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tarlatamab in Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.

Background: Tarlatamab, a bispecific delta-like ligand 3-directed T-cell engager immunotherapy, received accelerated approval for the treatment of patients with previously treated small-cell lung cancer. Whether tarlatamab is more effective than chemotherapy in the treatment of patients whose small-cell lung cancer has progressed during or after initial platinum-based chemotherapy is not known.

Methods: We conducted a multinational, phase 3, open-label trial to compare tarlatamab with chemotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with small-cell lung cancer whose disease had progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive tarlatamab or chemotherapy (topotecan, lurbinectedin, or amrubicin). The primary end point was overall survival. Key secondary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival and patient-reported outcomes. Results of the prespecified interim analysis (data-cutoff date, January 29, 2025) are reported.

Results: A total of 509 patients were randomly assigned to receive tarlatamab (254 patients) or chemotherapy (255 patients). Treatment with tarlatamab resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy (median, 13.6 months [95% confidence interval {CI}, 11.1 to not reached] vs. 8.3 months [95% CI, 7.0 to 10.2]; stratified hazard ratio for death, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.77; P<0.001). Tarlatamab treatment also had a significant benefit with respect to progression-free survival and cancer-related dyspnea and cough as compared with chemotherapy. The incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was lower with tarlatamab than with chemotherapy (54% vs. 80%), as was the incidence of adverse events resulting in treatment discontinuation (5% vs. 12%).

Conclusions: Treatment with tarlatamab led to longer overall survival than chemotherapy among patients with small-cell lung cancer whose disease had progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. (Funded by Amgen; DeLLphi-304 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05740566.).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信