Inavolisib治疗pik3ca突变晚期乳腺癌的总生存率。

IF 96.2 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Komal L Jhaveri, Seock-Ah Im, Cristina Saura, Sibylle Loibl, Kevin Kalinsky, Peter Schmid, Sherene Loi, Eirini Thanopoulou, Noopur Shankar, Yanling Jin, Thomas J Stout, Tiffany D Clark, Chunyan Song, Dejan Juric, Nicholas C Turner
{"title":"Inavolisib治疗pik3ca突变晚期乳腺癌的总生存率。","authors":"Komal L Jhaveri, Seock-Ah Im, Cristina Saura, Sibylle Loibl, Kevin Kalinsky, Peter Schmid, Sherene Loi, Eirini Thanopoulou, Noopur Shankar, Yanling Jin, Thomas J Stout, Tiffany D Clark, Chunyan Song, Dejan Juric, Nicholas C Turner","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2501796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the phase 3, double-blind, randomized INAVO120 trial, treatment with inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant led to a significant progression-free survival benefit, as compared with placebo plus palbociclib-fulvestrant, among patients with <i>PIK3CA</i>-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had had relapse during or within 12 months after completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned patients with <i>PIK3CA</i>-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had had disease recurrence or progression during or within 12 months after completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy to receive inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant (inavolisib group) or placebo plus palbociclib-fulvestrant (placebo group). In the current report, we provide the results of the final analysis of overall survival, including updated data on efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 161 patients were assigned to the inavolisib group, and 164 to the placebo group. After a median follow-up of 34.2 months in the inavolisib group and 32.3 months in the placebo group, the median overall survival was 34.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4 to 44.8) with inavolisib and 27.0 months (95% CI, 22.8 to 38.7) with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.94; P = 0.02 [prespecified boundary for statistical significance, P<0.0469]). An objective response occurred in 62.7% (95% CI, 54.8 to 70.2) of patients in the inavolisib group and 28.0% (95% CI, 21.3 to 35.6) of those in the placebo group (P<0.001). The updated hazard ratio for disease progression or death was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.32 to 0.55). Adverse events led to discontinuation of inavolisib in 6.8% of patients and discontinuation of placebo in 0.6%. The incidence of hyperglycemia, stomatitis or mucosal inflammation, gastrointestinal toxic effects (e.g., diarrhea), and ocular toxic effects (e.g., dry eye and blurred vision) was higher with inavolisib than with placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment with inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant led to a significant overall survival benefit, as compared with placebo plus palbociclib-fulvestrant. Hyperglycemia, stomatitis or mucosal inflammation, gastrointestinal toxic effects, and ocular toxic effects were reported more frequently with inavolisib than with placebo. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; INAVO120 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04191499.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overall Survival with Inavolisib in <i>PIK3CA</i>-Mutated Advanced Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Komal L Jhaveri, Seock-Ah Im, Cristina Saura, Sibylle Loibl, Kevin Kalinsky, Peter Schmid, Sherene Loi, Eirini Thanopoulou, Noopur Shankar, Yanling Jin, Thomas J Stout, Tiffany D Clark, Chunyan Song, Dejan Juric, Nicholas C Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.1056/NEJMoa2501796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the phase 3, double-blind, randomized INAVO120 trial, treatment with inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant led to a significant progression-free survival benefit, as compared with placebo plus palbociclib-fulvestrant, among patients with <i>PIK3CA</i>-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had had relapse during or within 12 months after completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned patients with <i>PIK3CA</i>-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had had disease recurrence or progression during or within 12 months after completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy to receive inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant (inavolisib group) or placebo plus palbociclib-fulvestrant (placebo group). In the current report, we provide the results of the final analysis of overall survival, including updated data on efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 161 patients were assigned to the inavolisib group, and 164 to the placebo group. After a median follow-up of 34.2 months in the inavolisib group and 32.3 months in the placebo group, the median overall survival was 34.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4 to 44.8) with inavolisib and 27.0 months (95% CI, 22.8 to 38.7) with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.94; P = 0.02 [prespecified boundary for statistical significance, P<0.0469]). An objective response occurred in 62.7% (95% CI, 54.8 to 70.2) of patients in the inavolisib group and 28.0% (95% CI, 21.3 to 35.6) of those in the placebo group (P<0.001). The updated hazard ratio for disease progression or death was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.32 to 0.55). Adverse events led to discontinuation of inavolisib in 6.8% of patients and discontinuation of placebo in 0.6%. The incidence of hyperglycemia, stomatitis or mucosal inflammation, gastrointestinal toxic effects (e.g., diarrhea), and ocular toxic effects (e.g., dry eye and blurred vision) was higher with inavolisib than with placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment with inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant led to a significant overall survival benefit, as compared with placebo plus palbociclib-fulvestrant. Hyperglycemia, stomatitis or mucosal inflammation, gastrointestinal toxic effects, and ocular toxic effects were reported more frequently with inavolisib than with placebo. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; INAVO120 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04191499.).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":96.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2501796\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2501796","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在3期、双盲、随机的INAVO120试验中,在pik3ca突变、激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)阴性、在辅助内分泌治疗完成后12个月内复发的局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌患者中,与安慰剂加palbociclib-fulvestrant相比,inavolisib加palbociclib-fulvestrant治疗可显著提高无进展生存期。方法:我们随机分配pik3ca突变、激素受体阳性、her2阴性的局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌患者,这些患者在辅助内分泌治疗期间或完成后12个月内有疾病复发或进展,接受依那维西布加帕博西利-氟维司汀(依那维西布组)或安慰剂加帕博西利-氟维司汀(安慰剂组)。在当前的报告中,我们提供了总生存期的最终分析结果,包括有效性和安全性的最新数据。结果:共有161名患者被分配到inavolisib组,164名患者被分配到安慰剂组。inavolisib组的中位随访时间为34.2个月,安慰剂组的中位随访时间为32.3个月,inavolisib组的中位总生存期为34.0个月(95%可信区间[CI], 28.4至44.8),安慰剂组的中位总生存期为27.0个月(95% CI, 22.8至38.7)(死亡风险比,0.67;95% CI, 0.48 ~ 0.94;P = 0.02[预先设定的统计学意义边界,P]结论:与安慰剂+ palbociclib-fulvestrant相比,inavolisib + palbociclib-fulvestrant治疗可显着提高总生存期。与安慰剂组相比,inavolisib组出现高血糖、口腔炎或粘膜炎症、胃肠道毒性作用和眼毒性作用的频率更高。(F. Hoffmann-La Roche资助;INAVO120 ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT04191499)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Overall Survival with Inavolisib in PIK3CA-Mutated Advanced Breast Cancer.

Background: In the phase 3, double-blind, randomized INAVO120 trial, treatment with inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant led to a significant progression-free survival benefit, as compared with placebo plus palbociclib-fulvestrant, among patients with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had had relapse during or within 12 months after completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy.

Methods: We randomly assigned patients with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had had disease recurrence or progression during or within 12 months after completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy to receive inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant (inavolisib group) or placebo plus palbociclib-fulvestrant (placebo group). In the current report, we provide the results of the final analysis of overall survival, including updated data on efficacy and safety.

Results: A total of 161 patients were assigned to the inavolisib group, and 164 to the placebo group. After a median follow-up of 34.2 months in the inavolisib group and 32.3 months in the placebo group, the median overall survival was 34.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4 to 44.8) with inavolisib and 27.0 months (95% CI, 22.8 to 38.7) with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.94; P = 0.02 [prespecified boundary for statistical significance, P<0.0469]). An objective response occurred in 62.7% (95% CI, 54.8 to 70.2) of patients in the inavolisib group and 28.0% (95% CI, 21.3 to 35.6) of those in the placebo group (P<0.001). The updated hazard ratio for disease progression or death was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.32 to 0.55). Adverse events led to discontinuation of inavolisib in 6.8% of patients and discontinuation of placebo in 0.6%. The incidence of hyperglycemia, stomatitis or mucosal inflammation, gastrointestinal toxic effects (e.g., diarrhea), and ocular toxic effects (e.g., dry eye and blurred vision) was higher with inavolisib than with placebo.

Conclusions: Treatment with inavolisib plus palbociclib-fulvestrant led to a significant overall survival benefit, as compared with placebo plus palbociclib-fulvestrant. Hyperglycemia, stomatitis or mucosal inflammation, gastrointestinal toxic effects, and ocular toxic effects were reported more frequently with inavolisib than with placebo. (Funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche; INAVO120 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04191499.).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信