评估卫生保健工作者接种疫苗后的COVID - IGRA和IgG抗体。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Lina Ghandour, Wissam Yaacoub, George F Araj
{"title":"评估卫生保健工作者接种疫苗后的COVID - IGRA和IgG抗体。","authors":"Lina Ghandour, Wissam Yaacoub, George F Araj","doi":"10.3855/jidc.20732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluated the durability of humoral and cell-mediated immunity (CMI) post Pfizer vaccination among healthcare workers (HCWs) at a tertiary care center in Lebanon.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A total of 42 HCWs were enrolled, with their past infection and/or vaccination duration ranging between 2 months and 2 years. Blood samples were tested for COVID CMI and humoral immunity simultaneously. Testing for COVID CMI was done by measuring the interferon gamma-release assay (IGRA) using the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 test, and for COVID humoral immunity using the lateral flow Cellex qSARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM Rapid Test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study group was 69% female and 31% male, aged 22-51 years. SARS-CoV-2 was contracted by 33 (78%) HCWs. Positive COVID humoral IgG and CMI response were found among 35 (83.3%) and 19 (45.2%) HCWs, respectively. Combining the findings for both tests revealed concordant positivity in 35.7%, concordant negativity in 7.1%, Pos IgG - Neg IGRA in 47.6%, and Neg IgG - Pos IGRA in 9.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Generally, no correlation was established between humoral and CMI responses following COVID-19 vaccination. That only 83.3% and 45.2% among the Pfizer-vaccinated HCWs tested positive for COVID humoral and CMI, respectively, prevents substantial conclusions about test reliability for determining immunity status post vaccination. Whether these results are influenced by the specific antigenic epitopes used in the tests or by the potential deterioration of the immune response over time remains to be determined. The incongruity between humoral and CMI responses post-vaccination suggests the need for more comprehensive testing methodologies to assess post-vaccination immunity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","volume":"19 5","pages":"654-660"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing COVID IGRA and IgG antibodies in healthcare workers post vaccination.\",\"authors\":\"Lina Ghandour, Wissam Yaacoub, George F Araj\",\"doi\":\"10.3855/jidc.20732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluated the durability of humoral and cell-mediated immunity (CMI) post Pfizer vaccination among healthcare workers (HCWs) at a tertiary care center in Lebanon.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A total of 42 HCWs were enrolled, with their past infection and/or vaccination duration ranging between 2 months and 2 years. Blood samples were tested for COVID CMI and humoral immunity simultaneously. Testing for COVID CMI was done by measuring the interferon gamma-release assay (IGRA) using the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 test, and for COVID humoral immunity using the lateral flow Cellex qSARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM Rapid Test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study group was 69% female and 31% male, aged 22-51 years. SARS-CoV-2 was contracted by 33 (78%) HCWs. Positive COVID humoral IgG and CMI response were found among 35 (83.3%) and 19 (45.2%) HCWs, respectively. Combining the findings for both tests revealed concordant positivity in 35.7%, concordant negativity in 7.1%, Pos IgG - Neg IGRA in 47.6%, and Neg IgG - Pos IGRA in 9.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Generally, no correlation was established between humoral and CMI responses following COVID-19 vaccination. That only 83.3% and 45.2% among the Pfizer-vaccinated HCWs tested positive for COVID humoral and CMI, respectively, prevents substantial conclusions about test reliability for determining immunity status post vaccination. Whether these results are influenced by the specific antigenic epitopes used in the tests or by the potential deterioration of the immune response over time remains to be determined. The incongruity between humoral and CMI responses post-vaccination suggests the need for more comprehensive testing methodologies to assess post-vaccination immunity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries\",\"volume\":\"19 5\",\"pages\":\"654-660\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.20732\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.20732","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究评估了黎巴嫩三级保健中心的卫生保健工作者(HCWs)在辉瑞疫苗接种后体液和细胞介导免疫(CMI)的持久性。方法:共纳入42名卫生保健员,他们过去的感染和/或疫苗接种时间从2个月到2年不等。同时检测血样COVID - CMI和体液免疫。采用QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2检测干扰素γ释放法(IGRA)检测COVID - CMI,采用侧流celllex qSARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM快速检测COVID -体液免疫。结果:研究组女性占69%,男性占31%,年龄22-51岁。33名卫生工作者(78%)感染了SARS-CoV-2。其中,35例(83.3%)和19例(45.2%)的HCWs抗体和CMI反应呈阳性。综合两种检测结果,一致阳性占35.7%,一致阴性占7.1%,阳性IgG -阴性IGRA占47.6%,阴性IgG -阳性IGRA占9.5%。结论:一般来说,COVID-19疫苗接种后体液反应与CMI反应之间没有相关性。在接种了辉瑞疫苗的医护人员中,分别只有83.3%和45.2%的人检测出COVID - humoral和CMI阳性,这使得无法对确定疫苗接种后免疫状态的测试可靠性得出实质性结论。这些结果是否受到试验中使用的特定抗原表位的影响,还是受到随着时间推移免疫反应可能恶化的影响,仍有待确定。疫苗接种后体液和CMI反应之间的不一致表明需要更全面的测试方法来评估疫苗接种后免疫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing COVID IGRA and IgG antibodies in healthcare workers post vaccination.

Introduction: This study evaluated the durability of humoral and cell-mediated immunity (CMI) post Pfizer vaccination among healthcare workers (HCWs) at a tertiary care center in Lebanon.

Methodology: A total of 42 HCWs were enrolled, with their past infection and/or vaccination duration ranging between 2 months and 2 years. Blood samples were tested for COVID CMI and humoral immunity simultaneously. Testing for COVID CMI was done by measuring the interferon gamma-release assay (IGRA) using the QuantiFERON SARS-CoV-2 test, and for COVID humoral immunity using the lateral flow Cellex qSARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM Rapid Test.

Results: The study group was 69% female and 31% male, aged 22-51 years. SARS-CoV-2 was contracted by 33 (78%) HCWs. Positive COVID humoral IgG and CMI response were found among 35 (83.3%) and 19 (45.2%) HCWs, respectively. Combining the findings for both tests revealed concordant positivity in 35.7%, concordant negativity in 7.1%, Pos IgG - Neg IGRA in 47.6%, and Neg IgG - Pos IGRA in 9.5%.

Conclusions: Generally, no correlation was established between humoral and CMI responses following COVID-19 vaccination. That only 83.3% and 45.2% among the Pfizer-vaccinated HCWs tested positive for COVID humoral and CMI, respectively, prevents substantial conclusions about test reliability for determining immunity status post vaccination. Whether these results are influenced by the specific antigenic epitopes used in the tests or by the potential deterioration of the immune response over time remains to be determined. The incongruity between humoral and CMI responses post-vaccination suggests the need for more comprehensive testing methodologies to assess post-vaccination immunity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
239
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries (JIDC) is an international journal, intended for the publication of scientific articles from Developing Countries by scientists from Developing Countries. JIDC is an independent, on-line publication with an international editorial board. JIDC is open access with no cost to view or download articles and reasonable cost for publication of research artcles, making JIDC easily availiable to scientists from resource restricted regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信