电动工具去除固定良好的髋臼杯:一项比较实验研究。

IF 1.9 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.4055/cios24076
Jun Young Chung, Yonghan Cha, Chang-Ho Jung, Jin-Woo Kim, Jun-Il Yoo, Jung-Taek Kim, Yongho Jeon
{"title":"电动工具去除固定良好的髋臼杯:一项比较实验研究。","authors":"Jun Young Chung, Yonghan Cha, Chang-Ho Jung, Jin-Woo Kim, Jun-Il Yoo, Jung-Taek Kim, Yongho Jeon","doi":"10.4055/cios24076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgroud: </strong>The removal of a well-fixed acetabular cup is a challenging, labor-intensive, and time-consuming step during revision hip arthroplasty. Although the advent of the manual osteotome, Explant, has simplified the procedure, it is still a stressful process as it dissipates the surgeon's strength and time and risks an iatrogenic pelvic fracture. Recently, EZX, a powered tool for extraction of well-fixed acetabular cups with semicircular blade was invented. This study aimed to compare Explant and EZX in an experimental condition for their efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cementless acetabular cups were press-fitted to 20 hemipelvic polyurethane models using foam adhesives. Ten cups were removed with each tool for comparison of the elapsed time, loads on the entire hemipelvis, periacetabular strain and temperature, volume of periacetabular bone removed, and diameter of the remaining acetabular rim. Strains and loads were quantitatively assessed using strain gauges and load cells for precise and reliable measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean duration required to remove a well-fixed cup with EZX was 38.5 seconds (range, 25-55), whereas that with Explant was 543.7 seconds (range, 214-1,051) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The load on the entire hemipelvis with EZX (mean, 9.1 kgf; range, 6.4-11.3) was 33% lower than that with Explant (mean, 13.6 kgf; range, 9.2-17.1) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The periacetabular peak strains at the 3 positions with EZX were significantly lower than those with Explant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The temperature during the removal did not differ significantly between the 2 tools. Although the mean volume of bone loss with Explant was 2.4 mL more than that with EZX (<i>p</i> < 0.001), the mean diameters of the remaining acetabular rim were not significantly different, measuring 54.1 mm with both tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present experiment revealed that a well-fixed cup could be removed using a powered tool with less strength and time and less load on the entire pelvis. Although the powered tool removed a larger volume of bone, the diameters of the remaining acetabular rims were equivalent. This tool may help surgeons remove well-fixed cups in a short time and reduce the deforming load on the bone around the cup without increasing the size of the subsequent reconstruction cup.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"17 3","pages":"372-380"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12104036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Powered Tool for the Removal of a Well-Fixed Acetabular Cup: A Comparative Experimental Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jun Young Chung, Yonghan Cha, Chang-Ho Jung, Jin-Woo Kim, Jun-Il Yoo, Jung-Taek Kim, Yongho Jeon\",\"doi\":\"10.4055/cios24076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Backgroud: </strong>The removal of a well-fixed acetabular cup is a challenging, labor-intensive, and time-consuming step during revision hip arthroplasty. Although the advent of the manual osteotome, Explant, has simplified the procedure, it is still a stressful process as it dissipates the surgeon's strength and time and risks an iatrogenic pelvic fracture. Recently, EZX, a powered tool for extraction of well-fixed acetabular cups with semicircular blade was invented. This study aimed to compare Explant and EZX in an experimental condition for their efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cementless acetabular cups were press-fitted to 20 hemipelvic polyurethane models using foam adhesives. Ten cups were removed with each tool for comparison of the elapsed time, loads on the entire hemipelvis, periacetabular strain and temperature, volume of periacetabular bone removed, and diameter of the remaining acetabular rim. Strains and loads were quantitatively assessed using strain gauges and load cells for precise and reliable measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean duration required to remove a well-fixed cup with EZX was 38.5 seconds (range, 25-55), whereas that with Explant was 543.7 seconds (range, 214-1,051) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The load on the entire hemipelvis with EZX (mean, 9.1 kgf; range, 6.4-11.3) was 33% lower than that with Explant (mean, 13.6 kgf; range, 9.2-17.1) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The periacetabular peak strains at the 3 positions with EZX were significantly lower than those with Explant (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The temperature during the removal did not differ significantly between the 2 tools. Although the mean volume of bone loss with Explant was 2.4 mL more than that with EZX (<i>p</i> < 0.001), the mean diameters of the remaining acetabular rim were not significantly different, measuring 54.1 mm with both tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present experiment revealed that a well-fixed cup could be removed using a powered tool with less strength and time and less load on the entire pelvis. Although the powered tool removed a larger volume of bone, the diameters of the remaining acetabular rims were equivalent. This tool may help surgeons remove well-fixed cups in a short time and reduce the deforming load on the bone around the cup without increasing the size of the subsequent reconstruction cup.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"372-380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12104036/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24076\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在翻修髋关节置换术中,取出固定良好的髋臼杯是一项具有挑战性、劳动强度大且耗时的步骤。尽管人工去骨术(植骨术)的出现简化了手术过程,但它仍然是一个充满压力的过程,因为它消耗了外科医生的力量和时间,并有医源性骨盆骨折的风险。最近,发明了EZX,一种用于拔出固定良好的半圆形刀片髋臼杯的电动工具。本研究旨在比较expant和EZX在实验条件下的有效性和安全性。方法:采用泡沫胶粘剂对20例半骨盆聚氨酯模型进行无水泥髋臼杯加压固定。每个工具取出10个杯子,比较时间、整个半骨盆负荷、髋臼周围应变和温度、髋臼周围骨取出的体积和剩余髋臼边缘的直径。应变和载荷的定量评估使用应变计和称重传感器进行精确和可靠的测量。结果:使用EZX移除固定良好的杯子所需的平均时间为38.5秒(范围,25-55),而使用Explant移除杯子所需的平均时间为543.7秒(范围,214-1,051)(p < 0.001)。EZX对整个半骨盆的负荷(平均9.1 kgf;范围,6.4-11.3)比外植体低33%(平均,13.6 kgf;范围,9.2-17.1)(p < 0.001)。EZX组髋臼周围3个位置的峰值应变均显著低于外植体组(p < 0.001)。两种工具在去除过程中的温度没有显著差异。虽然植骨剂的平均骨丢失体积比EZX多2.4 mL (p < 0.001),但两种工具的剩余髋臼边缘平均直径无显著差异,均为54.1 mm。结论:本实验表明,一个固定良好的杯可以使用电动工具去除,减少了力量和时间,减少了整个骨盆的负荷。尽管电动工具切除了更大体积的骨头,但剩余的髋臼边缘的直径是相等的。该工具可以帮助外科医生在短时间内取出固定良好的假杯,减少假杯周围骨骼的变形负荷,而不会增加后续重建假杯的尺寸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Powered Tool for the Removal of a Well-Fixed Acetabular Cup: A Comparative Experimental Study.

Backgroud: The removal of a well-fixed acetabular cup is a challenging, labor-intensive, and time-consuming step during revision hip arthroplasty. Although the advent of the manual osteotome, Explant, has simplified the procedure, it is still a stressful process as it dissipates the surgeon's strength and time and risks an iatrogenic pelvic fracture. Recently, EZX, a powered tool for extraction of well-fixed acetabular cups with semicircular blade was invented. This study aimed to compare Explant and EZX in an experimental condition for their efficacy and safety.

Methods: Cementless acetabular cups were press-fitted to 20 hemipelvic polyurethane models using foam adhesives. Ten cups were removed with each tool for comparison of the elapsed time, loads on the entire hemipelvis, periacetabular strain and temperature, volume of periacetabular bone removed, and diameter of the remaining acetabular rim. Strains and loads were quantitatively assessed using strain gauges and load cells for precise and reliable measurements.

Results: The mean duration required to remove a well-fixed cup with EZX was 38.5 seconds (range, 25-55), whereas that with Explant was 543.7 seconds (range, 214-1,051) (p < 0.001). The load on the entire hemipelvis with EZX (mean, 9.1 kgf; range, 6.4-11.3) was 33% lower than that with Explant (mean, 13.6 kgf; range, 9.2-17.1) (p < 0.001). The periacetabular peak strains at the 3 positions with EZX were significantly lower than those with Explant (p < 0.001). The temperature during the removal did not differ significantly between the 2 tools. Although the mean volume of bone loss with Explant was 2.4 mL more than that with EZX (p < 0.001), the mean diameters of the remaining acetabular rim were not significantly different, measuring 54.1 mm with both tools.

Conclusions: The present experiment revealed that a well-fixed cup could be removed using a powered tool with less strength and time and less load on the entire pelvis. Although the powered tool removed a larger volume of bone, the diameters of the remaining acetabular rims were equivalent. This tool may help surgeons remove well-fixed cups in a short time and reduce the deforming load on the bone around the cup without increasing the size of the subsequent reconstruction cup.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信