{"title":"考察白人大学生白人特权态度与制度合法化意识之间的关系中的性别和批判意识。","authors":"Delida Sanchez, Sarah Arango, Whitney Adams, Isabella Stoto, Génesis Genao, Enrique Aguayo, Annemarie Dechellis","doi":"10.1037/cou0000799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined the associations between White Privilege Attitudes Scale (WPAS) and two system-legitimizing ideologies, social dominance orientation and anti-immigrant attitudes, among 819 White American college students (63.2% women). Gender and critical consciousness were examined as potential moderators in these links. <i>T</i> tests assessed group differences in study variables based on gender. Direct associations between WPAS, system-legitimizing ideologies, and two-way interactions between gender and critical consciousness were examined via path analyses. White women reported significantly higher rates of WPAS and critical consciousness and significantly lower rates of system-legitimizing ideologies than White men. WPAS confront was negatively associated, and WPAS cost was positively associated with system-legitimizing ideologies. Significant positive two-way interactions were found between WPAS Cost × Gender and WPAS Cost × Critical Consciousness for system-legitimizing ideologies. Our findings identified distinct patterns between WPAS and system-legitimizing ideologies among White college students. The anticipated costs of addressing White privilege may serve as a barrier against reducing system-legitimizing ideologies, particularly among White men. Willingness to confront White privilege may be associated with lower system-legitimizing ideologies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"463-474"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining gender and critical consciousness in the associations between White privilege attitudes and system-legitimizing ideologies in White college students.\",\"authors\":\"Delida Sanchez, Sarah Arango, Whitney Adams, Isabella Stoto, Génesis Genao, Enrique Aguayo, Annemarie Dechellis\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cou0000799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We examined the associations between White Privilege Attitudes Scale (WPAS) and two system-legitimizing ideologies, social dominance orientation and anti-immigrant attitudes, among 819 White American college students (63.2% women). Gender and critical consciousness were examined as potential moderators in these links. <i>T</i> tests assessed group differences in study variables based on gender. Direct associations between WPAS, system-legitimizing ideologies, and two-way interactions between gender and critical consciousness were examined via path analyses. White women reported significantly higher rates of WPAS and critical consciousness and significantly lower rates of system-legitimizing ideologies than White men. WPAS confront was negatively associated, and WPAS cost was positively associated with system-legitimizing ideologies. Significant positive two-way interactions were found between WPAS Cost × Gender and WPAS Cost × Critical Consciousness for system-legitimizing ideologies. Our findings identified distinct patterns between WPAS and system-legitimizing ideologies among White college students. The anticipated costs of addressing White privilege may serve as a barrier against reducing system-legitimizing ideologies, particularly among White men. Willingness to confront White privilege may be associated with lower system-legitimizing ideologies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Counseling Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"463-474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Counseling Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000799\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000799","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究以819名美国白人大学生(女性占63.2%)为研究对象,考察了白人特权态度量表(WPAS)与两种制度合法化意识形态——社会支配取向和反移民态度之间的关系。性别和批判意识被认为是这些联系的潜在调节因素。T检验评估了基于性别的研究变量的组间差异。通过路径分析,研究了WPAS、系统合法化意识形态之间的直接联系,以及性别与批判意识之间的双向互动。白人女性报告的WPAS和批判意识的比例明显高于白人男性,而制度合法化意识的比例明显低于白人男性。WPAS对抗与系统合法化意识形态呈负相关,而WPAS成本与系统合法化意识形态呈正相关。WPAS成本×性别与WPAS成本×制度合法化意识批判意识之间存在显著的双向正向交互作用。我们的研究发现,在白人大学生中,WPAS和制度合法化意识形态之间存在明显的模式。解决白人特权问题的预期成本可能会成为阻碍削弱制度合法化意识形态的障碍,尤其是在白人男性中。对抗白人特权的意愿可能与较低的制度合法化意识形态有关。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
Examining gender and critical consciousness in the associations between White privilege attitudes and system-legitimizing ideologies in White college students.
We examined the associations between White Privilege Attitudes Scale (WPAS) and two system-legitimizing ideologies, social dominance orientation and anti-immigrant attitudes, among 819 White American college students (63.2% women). Gender and critical consciousness were examined as potential moderators in these links. T tests assessed group differences in study variables based on gender. Direct associations between WPAS, system-legitimizing ideologies, and two-way interactions between gender and critical consciousness were examined via path analyses. White women reported significantly higher rates of WPAS and critical consciousness and significantly lower rates of system-legitimizing ideologies than White men. WPAS confront was negatively associated, and WPAS cost was positively associated with system-legitimizing ideologies. Significant positive two-way interactions were found between WPAS Cost × Gender and WPAS Cost × Critical Consciousness for system-legitimizing ideologies. Our findings identified distinct patterns between WPAS and system-legitimizing ideologies among White college students. The anticipated costs of addressing White privilege may serve as a barrier against reducing system-legitimizing ideologies, particularly among White men. Willingness to confront White privilege may be associated with lower system-legitimizing ideologies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Counseling Psychology® publishes empirical research in the areas of counseling activities (including assessment, interventions, consultation, supervision, training, prevention, and psychological education) career development and vocational psychology diversity and underrepresented populations in relation to counseling activities the development of new measures to be used in counseling activities professional issues in counseling psychology In addition, the Journal of Counseling Psychology considers reviews or theoretical contributions that have the potential for stimulating further research in counseling psychology, and conceptual or empirical contributions about methodological issues in counseling psychology research.