认知偏差和情绪症状学作为同伴伤害变化的预测因子:一项纵向结构方程模型研究。

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Fabiola Espinosa, Ivan Blanco, Nuria Martin-Romero, Alvaro Sanchez-Lopez
{"title":"认知偏差和情绪症状学作为同伴伤害变化的预测因子:一项纵向结构方程模型研究。","authors":"Fabiola Espinosa, Ivan Blanco, Nuria Martin-Romero, Alvaro Sanchez-Lopez","doi":"10.1007/s10802-025-01337-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bullying and peer victimization are major public health concerns among adolescents. In recent years, a bidirectional relationship between emotional symptoms and peer victimization has been proposed. Cognitive theories emphasize the role of cognitive biases (i.e., attention and interpretation) in the onset and maintenance of emotional symptoms. Considering this framework, this study aimed to examine whether cognitive biases predict temporal changes in peer victimization (i.e., physical, verbal-relational, and cyberbullying) by contributing to higher levels of emotional symptomatology. A sample of 179 adolescents aged 13-16 years old (M = 14.5) was assessed at two time points by completing self-report measures of peer victimization (CMIE-IV), depressive and anxious symptoms (SMFQ and GAD, respectively), and an experimental task (SST) for the assessment of cognitive biases of attention and interpretation. Structural equation modeling was conducted to examine whether emotional symptoms at T2 mediated the relationship between cognitive biases at T1 and changes in different forms of peer victimization from T1 to T2 (i.e., three months). Results showed an indirect effect of attention bias on changes in different types of peer victimization through interpretation bias and depressive symptoms. Likewise, attention bias had a direct effect on interpretation bias, and interpretation bias had a direct effect on depressive symptoms. These findings support the central role of cognitive biases in understanding the occurrence of depressive symptomatology and its potential impact on adolescents' higher risk of suffering from different peer victimization experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":36218,"journal":{"name":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Biases and Emotional Symptomatology as Predictors of Changes in Peer Victimization: A Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling Study.\",\"authors\":\"Fabiola Espinosa, Ivan Blanco, Nuria Martin-Romero, Alvaro Sanchez-Lopez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10802-025-01337-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bullying and peer victimization are major public health concerns among adolescents. In recent years, a bidirectional relationship between emotional symptoms and peer victimization has been proposed. Cognitive theories emphasize the role of cognitive biases (i.e., attention and interpretation) in the onset and maintenance of emotional symptoms. Considering this framework, this study aimed to examine whether cognitive biases predict temporal changes in peer victimization (i.e., physical, verbal-relational, and cyberbullying) by contributing to higher levels of emotional symptomatology. A sample of 179 adolescents aged 13-16 years old (M = 14.5) was assessed at two time points by completing self-report measures of peer victimization (CMIE-IV), depressive and anxious symptoms (SMFQ and GAD, respectively), and an experimental task (SST) for the assessment of cognitive biases of attention and interpretation. Structural equation modeling was conducted to examine whether emotional symptoms at T2 mediated the relationship between cognitive biases at T1 and changes in different forms of peer victimization from T1 to T2 (i.e., three months). Results showed an indirect effect of attention bias on changes in different types of peer victimization through interpretation bias and depressive symptoms. Likewise, attention bias had a direct effect on interpretation bias, and interpretation bias had a direct effect on depressive symptoms. These findings support the central role of cognitive biases in understanding the occurrence of depressive symptomatology and its potential impact on adolescents' higher risk of suffering from different peer victimization experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-025-01337-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-025-01337-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欺凌和同伴受害是青少年的主要公共卫生问题。近年来,情绪症状与同伴伤害之间存在双向关系。认知理论强调认知偏差(即注意和解释)在情绪症状的发生和维持中的作用。考虑到这一框架,本研究旨在研究认知偏差是否通过促进更高水平的情绪症状来预测同伴受害(即身体、语言关系和网络欺凌)的时间变化。在两个时间点对179名13-16岁的青少年(M = 14.5)进行了评估,分别完成了同伴受害自我报告(CMIE-IV)、抑郁和焦虑症状(分别为SMFQ和GAD)以及评估注意和解释认知偏差的实验任务(SST)。我们采用结构方程模型来检验T2时的情绪症状是否介导T1时的认知偏差与不同形式同伴伤害从T1到T2(即三个月)的变化之间的关系。结果表明,注意偏倚通过解释偏倚和抑郁症状间接影响不同类型同伴受害行为的变化。同样,注意偏倚对解释偏倚有直接影响,解释偏倚对抑郁症状有直接影响。这些发现支持认知偏差在理解抑郁症状的发生及其对青少年遭受不同同伴伤害经历的更高风险的潜在影响方面的核心作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive Biases and Emotional Symptomatology as Predictors of Changes in Peer Victimization: A Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling Study.

Bullying and peer victimization are major public health concerns among adolescents. In recent years, a bidirectional relationship between emotional symptoms and peer victimization has been proposed. Cognitive theories emphasize the role of cognitive biases (i.e., attention and interpretation) in the onset and maintenance of emotional symptoms. Considering this framework, this study aimed to examine whether cognitive biases predict temporal changes in peer victimization (i.e., physical, verbal-relational, and cyberbullying) by contributing to higher levels of emotional symptomatology. A sample of 179 adolescents aged 13-16 years old (M = 14.5) was assessed at two time points by completing self-report measures of peer victimization (CMIE-IV), depressive and anxious symptoms (SMFQ and GAD, respectively), and an experimental task (SST) for the assessment of cognitive biases of attention and interpretation. Structural equation modeling was conducted to examine whether emotional symptoms at T2 mediated the relationship between cognitive biases at T1 and changes in different forms of peer victimization from T1 to T2 (i.e., three months). Results showed an indirect effect of attention bias on changes in different types of peer victimization through interpretation bias and depressive symptoms. Likewise, attention bias had a direct effect on interpretation bias, and interpretation bias had a direct effect on depressive symptoms. These findings support the central role of cognitive biases in understanding the occurrence of depressive symptomatology and its potential impact on adolescents' higher risk of suffering from different peer victimization experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology Psychology-Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信