PRP微针与氨甲环酸微针治疗Melisma疗效比较。

IF 0.9 Q3 SURGERY
Nader Pazyar, Havva Hajati, Reza Yaghoobi, Nima Bakhtiari
{"title":"PRP微针与氨甲环酸微针治疗Melisma疗效比较。","authors":"Nader Pazyar, Havva Hajati, Reza Yaghoobi, Nima Bakhtiari","doi":"10.61186/wjps.14.1.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Melasma, characterized by irregular skin hyperpigmentation, presents a therapeutic challenge with limited universal solutions. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and Tranexamic Acid (TXA), coupled with microneedling, offer promising avenues for treatment. This clinical trial sought to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of microneedling with PRP versus TXA in managing melasma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a single-blind, randomized controlled trial from May 2022 to Apr 2023 and enrolled 23 female melasma patients. Using the coin toss method, patients were randomly assigned to receive microneedling with PRP on one side and microneedling with TXA on the other. Evaluation parameters included Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) scores, melasma improvement grading, patient satisfaction, and treatment-related side effects, monitored over three sessions at 3-week intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both microneedling approaches demonstrated effectiveness, with the PRP group exhibiting significantly lower MASI scores at the 6th and 9th wk. However, no significant distinctions were observed in improvement grading or patient satisfaction between the PRP and TXA groups. Side effects were minimal, limited to transient burning and mild pain during the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microneedling with PRP and TXA emerged as a safe and effective treatment for melasma. While the PRP group showed potential superiority in MASI scores, comprehensive considerations, including patient preferences and long-term outcomes, are crucial. Larger, multi-center studies with extended follow-up periods are warranted for a more nuanced understanding of these treatments in melasma management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23736,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"14 1","pages":"79-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124275/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Efficiency of Microneedling with PRP Versus Microneedling with Tranexamic Acid in the Treatment of Melisma.\",\"authors\":\"Nader Pazyar, Havva Hajati, Reza Yaghoobi, Nima Bakhtiari\",\"doi\":\"10.61186/wjps.14.1.79\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Melasma, characterized by irregular skin hyperpigmentation, presents a therapeutic challenge with limited universal solutions. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and Tranexamic Acid (TXA), coupled with microneedling, offer promising avenues for treatment. This clinical trial sought to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of microneedling with PRP versus TXA in managing melasma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a single-blind, randomized controlled trial from May 2022 to Apr 2023 and enrolled 23 female melasma patients. Using the coin toss method, patients were randomly assigned to receive microneedling with PRP on one side and microneedling with TXA on the other. Evaluation parameters included Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) scores, melasma improvement grading, patient satisfaction, and treatment-related side effects, monitored over three sessions at 3-week intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both microneedling approaches demonstrated effectiveness, with the PRP group exhibiting significantly lower MASI scores at the 6th and 9th wk. However, no significant distinctions were observed in improvement grading or patient satisfaction between the PRP and TXA groups. Side effects were minimal, limited to transient burning and mild pain during the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microneedling with PRP and TXA emerged as a safe and effective treatment for melasma. While the PRP group showed potential superiority in MASI scores, comprehensive considerations, including patient preferences and long-term outcomes, are crucial. Larger, multi-center studies with extended follow-up periods are warranted for a more nuanced understanding of these treatments in melasma management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"79-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124275/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61186/wjps.14.1.79\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61186/wjps.14.1.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:黄褐斑以不规则的皮肤色素沉着为特征,是一种治疗挑战,但普遍解决方案有限。富血小板血浆(PRP)和氨甲环酸(TXA),加上微针,提供了有希望的治疗途径。本临床试验旨在比较微针PRP与TXA治疗黄褐斑的疗效和不良反应。方法:研究于2022年5月至2023年4月进行单盲、随机对照试验,纳入23例女性黄褐斑患者。采用抛硬币法,随机分配患者一侧接受PRP微针,另一侧接受TXA微针。评估参数包括黄褐斑面积和严重程度指数(MASI)评分、黄褐斑改善分级、患者满意度和治疗相关副作用,每隔3周监测3次。结果:两种微针方法均显示出有效性,PRP组在第6周和第9周的MASI评分显著降低。然而,PRP组和TXA组在改善等级和患者满意度方面没有显著差异。副作用很小,在手术过程中仅限于短暂的灼烧和轻微的疼痛。结论:PRP、TXA微针治疗黄褐斑安全有效。虽然PRP组在MASI评分中显示出潜在的优势,但综合考虑,包括患者偏好和长期结果,是至关重要的。为了更细致地了解这些治疗方法在黄褐斑管理中的作用,有必要进行更大规模的多中心研究,延长随访期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Efficiency of Microneedling with PRP Versus Microneedling with Tranexamic Acid in the Treatment of Melisma.

Background: Melasma, characterized by irregular skin hyperpigmentation, presents a therapeutic challenge with limited universal solutions. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and Tranexamic Acid (TXA), coupled with microneedling, offer promising avenues for treatment. This clinical trial sought to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of microneedling with PRP versus TXA in managing melasma.

Methods: The study was a single-blind, randomized controlled trial from May 2022 to Apr 2023 and enrolled 23 female melasma patients. Using the coin toss method, patients were randomly assigned to receive microneedling with PRP on one side and microneedling with TXA on the other. Evaluation parameters included Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) scores, melasma improvement grading, patient satisfaction, and treatment-related side effects, monitored over three sessions at 3-week intervals.

Results: Both microneedling approaches demonstrated effectiveness, with the PRP group exhibiting significantly lower MASI scores at the 6th and 9th wk. However, no significant distinctions were observed in improvement grading or patient satisfaction between the PRP and TXA groups. Side effects were minimal, limited to transient burning and mild pain during the procedure.

Conclusion: Microneedling with PRP and TXA emerged as a safe and effective treatment for melasma. While the PRP group showed potential superiority in MASI scores, comprehensive considerations, including patient preferences and long-term outcomes, are crucial. Larger, multi-center studies with extended follow-up periods are warranted for a more nuanced understanding of these treatments in melasma management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信