配对宫颈细胞学样本和活检在病变严重程度和疫苗接种之间的HPV基因分型一致性。

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY
Shimin Chen, Qiaoyun Du, Jian Yin, Xiaoqian Xu, Wen Chen, Qinjing Pan, Xun Zhang, Ying Hong, Wenhua Zhang, Bin Liu, Jianfeng Cui, Shangying Hu, Fanghui Zhao
{"title":"配对宫颈细胞学样本和活检在病变严重程度和疫苗接种之间的HPV基因分型一致性。","authors":"Shimin Chen, Qiaoyun Du, Jian Yin, Xiaoqian Xu, Wen Chen, Qinjing Pan, Xun Zhang, Ying Hong, Wenhua Zhang, Bin Liu, Jianfeng Cui, Shangying Hu, Fanghui Zhao","doi":"10.1186/s12985-025-02791-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytological samples are genotyped to inform clinical management of HPV-infected women due to their accessibility. Conversely, HPV genotypes identified in biopsies are deemed directly associated with cervical lesions. Thus, investigating genotyping agreement between these two sample types and potential influence of lesion severity and vaccination status on their degree of concordance is essential for understanding their diagnostic reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paired cervical cytological samples and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsies from 392 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer (CIN+) cases (187 CIN1, 111 CIN2, 94 CIN3+; 262 unvaccinated, 130 vaccinated) were genotyped using SPF<sub>10</sub>-DEIA-LiPA<sub>25</sub> detection system. Strength of agreement was measured by kappa, with thresholds indicating varying levels of agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, most HPV genotypes were more frequently detected in cytological samples, with seven genotypes showing statistical differences between sample types (HPV39, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 68/73). Multi-type infection was more prevalent in cytological samples (147 versus 76, P<sub>McNemar's test</sub><0.001), whereas single-type infection was more common in FFPE biopsies (233 versus 296, P<sub>McNemar's test</sub><0.001). Proportions of observed agreement for all genotypes detected exceeded 95% and Prevalence-And-Bias-Adjusted kappa values (range: 0.832 to 0.990) indicated \"Strong\" (threshold: 0.80 to 0.90) to \"Almost Perfect\" (threshold: above 0.90) agreement. Lesion severity and vaccination status had negligible impacts on genotyping agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, HPV genotyping by cytological samples and FFPE biopsies performed equally well regardless of lesion severity and vaccination status, directly supporting reliable utility of cytological HPV genotyping for clinical decisions. However, impact of sample type needs to be considered when interpretating and utilizing multi-type and/or single-type infection for scientific research.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00779766). Registered on the 23th of October 2008.</p>","PeriodicalId":23616,"journal":{"name":"Virology Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"176"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HPV genotyping agreement between paired cervical cytological sample and biopsy across lesion severity and vaccination.\",\"authors\":\"Shimin Chen, Qiaoyun Du, Jian Yin, Xiaoqian Xu, Wen Chen, Qinjing Pan, Xun Zhang, Ying Hong, Wenhua Zhang, Bin Liu, Jianfeng Cui, Shangying Hu, Fanghui Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12985-025-02791-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytological samples are genotyped to inform clinical management of HPV-infected women due to their accessibility. Conversely, HPV genotypes identified in biopsies are deemed directly associated with cervical lesions. Thus, investigating genotyping agreement between these two sample types and potential influence of lesion severity and vaccination status on their degree of concordance is essential for understanding their diagnostic reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paired cervical cytological samples and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsies from 392 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer (CIN+) cases (187 CIN1, 111 CIN2, 94 CIN3+; 262 unvaccinated, 130 vaccinated) were genotyped using SPF<sub>10</sub>-DEIA-LiPA<sub>25</sub> detection system. Strength of agreement was measured by kappa, with thresholds indicating varying levels of agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, most HPV genotypes were more frequently detected in cytological samples, with seven genotypes showing statistical differences between sample types (HPV39, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 68/73). Multi-type infection was more prevalent in cytological samples (147 versus 76, P<sub>McNemar's test</sub><0.001), whereas single-type infection was more common in FFPE biopsies (233 versus 296, P<sub>McNemar's test</sub><0.001). Proportions of observed agreement for all genotypes detected exceeded 95% and Prevalence-And-Bias-Adjusted kappa values (range: 0.832 to 0.990) indicated \\\"Strong\\\" (threshold: 0.80 to 0.90) to \\\"Almost Perfect\\\" (threshold: above 0.90) agreement. Lesion severity and vaccination status had negligible impacts on genotyping agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, HPV genotyping by cytological samples and FFPE biopsies performed equally well regardless of lesion severity and vaccination status, directly supporting reliable utility of cytological HPV genotyping for clinical decisions. However, impact of sample type needs to be considered when interpretating and utilizing multi-type and/or single-type infection for scientific research.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00779766). Registered on the 23th of October 2008.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virology Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12128532/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-025-02791-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-025-02791-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:细胞学样本的基因分型告知hpv感染妇女的临床管理,因为他们的可及性。相反,活组织检查中发现的HPV基因型被认为与宫颈病变直接相关。因此,研究这两种样本类型之间的基因分型一致性,以及病变严重程度和疫苗接种状况对其一致性程度的潜在影响,对于了解其诊断可靠性至关重要。方法:对392例宫颈上皮内瘤变或癌(CIN+)进行配对宫颈细胞学检查和福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)活检(187例CIN1, 111例CIN2, 94例CIN3+;用SPF10-DEIA-LiPA25检测系统分型未接种者262例,接种者130例。一致性的强度用kappa来衡量,用阈值表示不同程度的一致性。结果:总体而言,大多数HPV基因型在细胞学样本中检出频率更高,7种基因型在不同样本类型间存在统计学差异(HPV39、51、52、53、56、58、68/73)。结论:总之,无论病变严重程度和疫苗接种状况如何,细胞学样本和FFPE活检的HPV基因分型效果都一样好,直接支持了HPV细胞学基因分型在临床决策中的可靠应用。然而,在解释和利用多型和/或单型感染进行科学研究时,需要考虑样本类型的影响。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00779766)。于2008年10月23日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
HPV genotyping agreement between paired cervical cytological sample and biopsy across lesion severity and vaccination.

Background: Cytological samples are genotyped to inform clinical management of HPV-infected women due to their accessibility. Conversely, HPV genotypes identified in biopsies are deemed directly associated with cervical lesions. Thus, investigating genotyping agreement between these two sample types and potential influence of lesion severity and vaccination status on their degree of concordance is essential for understanding their diagnostic reliability.

Methods: Paired cervical cytological samples and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) biopsies from 392 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer (CIN+) cases (187 CIN1, 111 CIN2, 94 CIN3+; 262 unvaccinated, 130 vaccinated) were genotyped using SPF10-DEIA-LiPA25 detection system. Strength of agreement was measured by kappa, with thresholds indicating varying levels of agreement.

Results: Overall, most HPV genotypes were more frequently detected in cytological samples, with seven genotypes showing statistical differences between sample types (HPV39, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 68/73). Multi-type infection was more prevalent in cytological samples (147 versus 76, PMcNemar's test<0.001), whereas single-type infection was more common in FFPE biopsies (233 versus 296, PMcNemar's test<0.001). Proportions of observed agreement for all genotypes detected exceeded 95% and Prevalence-And-Bias-Adjusted kappa values (range: 0.832 to 0.990) indicated "Strong" (threshold: 0.80 to 0.90) to "Almost Perfect" (threshold: above 0.90) agreement. Lesion severity and vaccination status had negligible impacts on genotyping agreement.

Conclusions: In conclusion, HPV genotyping by cytological samples and FFPE biopsies performed equally well regardless of lesion severity and vaccination status, directly supporting reliable utility of cytological HPV genotyping for clinical decisions. However, impact of sample type needs to be considered when interpretating and utilizing multi-type and/or single-type infection for scientific research.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00779766). Registered on the 23th of October 2008.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Virology Journal
Virology Journal 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
186
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Virology Journal is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of virology, including research on the viruses of animals, plants and microbes. The journal welcomes basic research as well as pre-clinical and clinical studies of novel diagnostic tools, vaccines and anti-viral therapies. The Editorial policy of Virology Journal is to publish all research which is assessed by peer reviewers to be a coherent and sound addition to the scientific literature, and puts less emphasis on interest levels or perceived impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信