Basri Çakıroğlu, Ali Egemen Avcı, Bekir Sami Uyanık, Süleyman Hilmi Aksoy, Elif Evrim Ekin
{"title":"术前输尿管直径测量在预测逆行ıntrarenal手术中难以进入的作用:对234例患者的回顾性分析。","authors":"Basri Çakıroğlu, Ali Egemen Avcı, Bekir Sami Uyanık, Süleyman Hilmi Aksoy, Elif Evrim Ekin","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01754-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive procedure used for the management of renal and ureteral stones. However, successful placement of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) remains a critical challenge, particularly in patients with narrow ureters. Preoperative measurement of ureteral diameter via computed tomography (CT) may help predict access difficulties and optimize surgical planning. This study aimed to evaluate the role of preoperative ureteral diameter measurements (distal, iliac, and upper ureters) in predicting difficult UAS placement during RIRS. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 234 patients who underwent RIRS for kidney stones. Ureteral diameters were measured at three anatomical levels using preoperative CT. Patient demographics, stone size, operative time, and surgical outcomes were recorded. Difficult access was defined as unsuccessful initial UAS placement requiring additional interventions such as guidewire manipulation, balloon dilation, or selection of a smaller sheath. Patients with smaller ureteral diameters at all three measured levels had a significantly higher incidence of difficult UAS placement (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed ureteral diameter as an independent predictor of difficult access. Additionally, previous stone-related interventions and patient demographics showed significant associations with ureteral diameter, further influencing surgical outcomes. Preoperative ureteral diameter measurement via CT provides valuable predictive insights into access challenges during RIRS. Routine assessment of ureteral diameter can enhance surgical planning, improve procedural efficiency, and reduce perioperative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of preoperative ureteral diameter measurements in predicting difficult access during retrograde ıntrarenal surgery: a retrospective analysis of 234 patients.\",\"authors\":\"Basri Çakıroğlu, Ali Egemen Avcı, Bekir Sami Uyanık, Süleyman Hilmi Aksoy, Elif Evrim Ekin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00240-025-01754-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive procedure used for the management of renal and ureteral stones. However, successful placement of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) remains a critical challenge, particularly in patients with narrow ureters. Preoperative measurement of ureteral diameter via computed tomography (CT) may help predict access difficulties and optimize surgical planning. This study aimed to evaluate the role of preoperative ureteral diameter measurements (distal, iliac, and upper ureters) in predicting difficult UAS placement during RIRS. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 234 patients who underwent RIRS for kidney stones. Ureteral diameters were measured at three anatomical levels using preoperative CT. Patient demographics, stone size, operative time, and surgical outcomes were recorded. Difficult access was defined as unsuccessful initial UAS placement requiring additional interventions such as guidewire manipulation, balloon dilation, or selection of a smaller sheath. Patients with smaller ureteral diameters at all three measured levels had a significantly higher incidence of difficult UAS placement (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed ureteral diameter as an independent predictor of difficult access. Additionally, previous stone-related interventions and patient demographics showed significant associations with ureteral diameter, further influencing surgical outcomes. Preoperative ureteral diameter measurement via CT provides valuable predictive insights into access challenges during RIRS. Routine assessment of ureteral diameter can enhance surgical planning, improve procedural efficiency, and reduce perioperative complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12129830/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urolithiasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01754-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01754-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of preoperative ureteral diameter measurements in predicting difficult access during retrograde ıntrarenal surgery: a retrospective analysis of 234 patients.
Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive procedure used for the management of renal and ureteral stones. However, successful placement of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) remains a critical challenge, particularly in patients with narrow ureters. Preoperative measurement of ureteral diameter via computed tomography (CT) may help predict access difficulties and optimize surgical planning. This study aimed to evaluate the role of preoperative ureteral diameter measurements (distal, iliac, and upper ureters) in predicting difficult UAS placement during RIRS. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 234 patients who underwent RIRS for kidney stones. Ureteral diameters were measured at three anatomical levels using preoperative CT. Patient demographics, stone size, operative time, and surgical outcomes were recorded. Difficult access was defined as unsuccessful initial UAS placement requiring additional interventions such as guidewire manipulation, balloon dilation, or selection of a smaller sheath. Patients with smaller ureteral diameters at all three measured levels had a significantly higher incidence of difficult UAS placement (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed ureteral diameter as an independent predictor of difficult access. Additionally, previous stone-related interventions and patient demographics showed significant associations with ureteral diameter, further influencing surgical outcomes. Preoperative ureteral diameter measurement via CT provides valuable predictive insights into access challenges during RIRS. Routine assessment of ureteral diameter can enhance surgical planning, improve procedural efficiency, and reduce perioperative complications.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society
The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field.
Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.