量化碳RBE模型对参考参数变化的敏感性。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Shannon Hartzell, Fada Guan, Giuseppe Magro, Paige Taylor, Christine B Peterson, Stephen F Kry
{"title":"量化碳RBE模型对参考参数变化的敏感性。","authors":"Shannon Hartzell, Fada Guan, Giuseppe Magro, Paige Taylor, Christine B Peterson, Stephen F Kry","doi":"10.1667/RADE-24-00162.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Models used to calculate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of carbon-ion radiotherapy include the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM), stochastic MKM (SMKM), repair-misrepair-fixation (RMF) model, and local effect model I (LEM). We compared the sensitivities of these models to variations in input biological and reference parameters. We used Monte Carlo simulations of clinically realistic carbon-ion beams incident on a phantom and scored input parameters for RBE models (kinetic energy, microdosimetric spectra, double-strand break yield, and physical dose). We combined data with cell- and model-specific parameters to calculate the linear (α) and quadratic (β) components of the carbon-ion beam, which were used along with the reference α and β values and dose to calculate RBE. Model sensitivity to parameters was quantified by statistically introducing uncertainty into independent parameters and sampling the resultant RBE. To assess histological differences contributing to variations in the RBE, we also used various reference cell lines. We recalculated the RBE using different reported datasets within individual cell lines to compare inter- and intra-cell line variability. The variability introduced by inherent measurement and estimation uncertainty was typically 26% for the microdosimetric models, 25% for the RMF model, and 30% for the LEM at the 1-σ level. The variability across cell lines, which averaged 27% for the microdosimetric models and 2.5% for the RMF model, was similar to the intra-cell line variability in the RBE as calculated with unique datasets for an individual cell line. While the focus is largely on comparing models, the results of this study indicate that the variation in RBE within each model, based solely on reference parameters, is substantial. Our findings indicate that the selection of input parameters is of comparable importance to the choice of cell line and even the RBE model. This study provides insight into model robustness and emphasizes the need for continued computational and in-vitro RBE research.</p>","PeriodicalId":20903,"journal":{"name":"Radiation research","volume":" ","pages":"113-126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Sensitivity of Carbon RBE Models to Reference Parameter Variations.\",\"authors\":\"Shannon Hartzell, Fada Guan, Giuseppe Magro, Paige Taylor, Christine B Peterson, Stephen F Kry\",\"doi\":\"10.1667/RADE-24-00162.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Models used to calculate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of carbon-ion radiotherapy include the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM), stochastic MKM (SMKM), repair-misrepair-fixation (RMF) model, and local effect model I (LEM). We compared the sensitivities of these models to variations in input biological and reference parameters. We used Monte Carlo simulations of clinically realistic carbon-ion beams incident on a phantom and scored input parameters for RBE models (kinetic energy, microdosimetric spectra, double-strand break yield, and physical dose). We combined data with cell- and model-specific parameters to calculate the linear (α) and quadratic (β) components of the carbon-ion beam, which were used along with the reference α and β values and dose to calculate RBE. Model sensitivity to parameters was quantified by statistically introducing uncertainty into independent parameters and sampling the resultant RBE. To assess histological differences contributing to variations in the RBE, we also used various reference cell lines. We recalculated the RBE using different reported datasets within individual cell lines to compare inter- and intra-cell line variability. The variability introduced by inherent measurement and estimation uncertainty was typically 26% for the microdosimetric models, 25% for the RMF model, and 30% for the LEM at the 1-σ level. The variability across cell lines, which averaged 27% for the microdosimetric models and 2.5% for the RMF model, was similar to the intra-cell line variability in the RBE as calculated with unique datasets for an individual cell line. While the focus is largely on comparing models, the results of this study indicate that the variation in RBE within each model, based solely on reference parameters, is substantial. Our findings indicate that the selection of input parameters is of comparable importance to the choice of cell line and even the RBE model. This study provides insight into model robustness and emphasizes the need for continued computational and in-vitro RBE research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"113-126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505421/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1667/RADE-24-00162.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1667/RADE-24-00162.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用于计算碳离子放疗相对生物有效性(RBE)的模型包括微剂量动力学模型(MKM)、随机MKM (SMKM)、修复-错修复-固定(RMF)模型和局部效应模型I (LEM)。我们比较了这些模型对输入生物参数和参考参数变化的敏感性。我们使用蒙特卡罗模拟临床真实的碳离子束入射到一个幻影上,并对RBE模型的输入参数(动能、微剂量谱、双链断裂率和物理剂量)进行评分。我们将数据与细胞和模型的特定参数相结合,计算出碳离子束的线性(α)和二次(β)分量,并与参考α和β值和剂量一起计算RBE。通过统计方法将不确定性引入独立参数并对结果RBE进行抽样,量化了模型对参数的敏感性。为了评估导致RBE变异的组织学差异,我们还使用了各种参考细胞系。我们在单个细胞系中使用不同的报告数据集重新计算RBE,以比较细胞系间和细胞系内的变异性。在1-σ水平上,由固有测量和估计不确定性引入的变异在微剂量模型中通常为26%,在RMF模型中为25%,在LEM中为30%。不同细胞系间的可变性,微剂量模型平均为27%,RMF模型平均为2.5%,与RBE中单个细胞系的独特数据集计算的细胞系内可变性相似。虽然重点主要放在比较模型上,但本研究的结果表明,仅基于参考参数,每个模型中RBE的变化是实质性的。我们的研究结果表明,输入参数的选择与细胞系甚至RBE模型的选择具有相当的重要性。这项研究提供了对模型鲁棒性的见解,并强调了继续进行计算和体外RBE研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying Sensitivity of Carbon RBE Models to Reference Parameter Variations.

Models used to calculate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of carbon-ion radiotherapy include the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM), stochastic MKM (SMKM), repair-misrepair-fixation (RMF) model, and local effect model I (LEM). We compared the sensitivities of these models to variations in input biological and reference parameters. We used Monte Carlo simulations of clinically realistic carbon-ion beams incident on a phantom and scored input parameters for RBE models (kinetic energy, microdosimetric spectra, double-strand break yield, and physical dose). We combined data with cell- and model-specific parameters to calculate the linear (α) and quadratic (β) components of the carbon-ion beam, which were used along with the reference α and β values and dose to calculate RBE. Model sensitivity to parameters was quantified by statistically introducing uncertainty into independent parameters and sampling the resultant RBE. To assess histological differences contributing to variations in the RBE, we also used various reference cell lines. We recalculated the RBE using different reported datasets within individual cell lines to compare inter- and intra-cell line variability. The variability introduced by inherent measurement and estimation uncertainty was typically 26% for the microdosimetric models, 25% for the RMF model, and 30% for the LEM at the 1-σ level. The variability across cell lines, which averaged 27% for the microdosimetric models and 2.5% for the RMF model, was similar to the intra-cell line variability in the RBE as calculated with unique datasets for an individual cell line. While the focus is largely on comparing models, the results of this study indicate that the variation in RBE within each model, based solely on reference parameters, is substantial. Our findings indicate that the selection of input parameters is of comparable importance to the choice of cell line and even the RBE model. This study provides insight into model robustness and emphasizes the need for continued computational and in-vitro RBE research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation research
Radiation research 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.80%
发文量
179
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Radiation Research publishes original articles dealing with radiation effects and related subjects in the areas of physics, chemistry, biology and medicine, including epidemiology and translational research. The term radiation is used in its broadest sense and includes specifically ionizing radiation and ultraviolet, visible and infrared light as well as microwaves, ultrasound and heat. Effects may be physical, chemical or biological. Related subjects include (but are not limited to) dosimetry methods and instrumentation, isotope techniques and studies with chemical agents contributing to the understanding of radiation effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信