植物性饮食对肌肉力量有害吗?随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Miguel López-Moreno, Eugenio Viviani Rossi, José Francisco López-Gil, Paula Marrero-Fernández, Alberto Roldán-Ruiz, Gabriele Bertotti
{"title":"植物性饮食对肌肉力量有害吗?随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。","authors":"Miguel López-Moreno, Eugenio Viviani Rossi, José Francisco López-Gil, Paula Marrero-Fernández, Alberto Roldán-Ruiz, Gabriele Bertotti","doi":"10.1186/s40798-025-00852-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing interest in plant-based diets (PBDs) results from their beneficial impact on human health and environmental sustainability. However, the effect of PBDs on muscular strength in athletes remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of PBDs on muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets in adult populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The methodology was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure a comprehensive and transparent review process. Four electronic databases-MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus-were searched from their inception to September 2, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the impact of PBDs on the lower body, upper body, and overall muscular strength were included. The risk of bias for the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were used to estimate effect sizes, and multiple random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using an inverse variance model with Paule-Mandel adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 188 participants (46% women; mean age between 20 and 65 years). The meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between PBDs and omnivorous diets in terms of upper body muscular strength (SMD, - 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 0.50 to 0.27; n = 146), lower body muscular strength (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, - 0.31 to 0.67; n = 188), and overall muscular strength (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, - 0.16 to 0.58; n = 188).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that PBDs do not compromise muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets. Further investigation considering key nutrients is necessary to ascertain the long-term effects of these dietary patterns on strength outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21788,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine - Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Miguel López-Moreno, Eugenio Viviani Rossi, José Francisco López-Gil, Paula Marrero-Fernández, Alberto Roldán-Ruiz, Gabriele Bertotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40798-025-00852-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing interest in plant-based diets (PBDs) results from their beneficial impact on human health and environmental sustainability. However, the effect of PBDs on muscular strength in athletes remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of PBDs on muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets in adult populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The methodology was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure a comprehensive and transparent review process. Four electronic databases-MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus-were searched from their inception to September 2, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the impact of PBDs on the lower body, upper body, and overall muscular strength were included. The risk of bias for the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were used to estimate effect sizes, and multiple random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using an inverse variance model with Paule-Mandel adjustment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 188 participants (46% women; mean age between 20 and 65 years). The meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between PBDs and omnivorous diets in terms of upper body muscular strength (SMD, - 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 0.50 to 0.27; n = 146), lower body muscular strength (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, - 0.31 to 0.67; n = 188), and overall muscular strength (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, - 0.16 to 0.58; n = 188).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that PBDs do not compromise muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets. Further investigation considering key nutrients is necessary to ascertain the long-term effects of these dietary patterns on strength outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine - Open\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130401/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine - Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00852-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine - Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00852-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于植物性饮食对人类健康和环境可持续性的有益影响,人们对植物性饮食越来越感兴趣。然而,PBDs对运动员肌肉力量的影响尚不清楚。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了与杂食性饮食相比,多糖膳食对成人肌肉力量的影响。方法:方法遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行,以确保评价过程的全面和透明。四个电子数据库- medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science和scopus -从其成立到2024年9月2日进行了检索。随机对照试验(rct)评估了PBDs对下半身、上半身和整体肌肉力量的影响。使用Cochrane risk of bias 2.0工具评估纳入的rct的偏倚风险。使用标准化平均差异(SMD)估计效应大小,并使用具有Paule-Mandel调整的逆方差模型进行多随机效应荟萃分析。结果:8项随机对照试验符合纳入标准,共涉及188名受试者(46%为女性;平均年龄在20至65岁之间)。meta分析显示,多食饮食和杂食性饮食在上肢肌肉力量方面没有显著差异(SMD, - 0.12;95%置信区间[CI], - 0.50 ~ 0.27;n = 146)、下半身肌力(SMD, 0.18;95% CI, - 0.31 ~ 0.67;n = 188),整体肌力(SMD, 0.21;95% CI, - 0.16 ~ 0.58;n = 188)。结论:这项荟萃分析表明,与杂食性饮食相比,多溴代饮食不会损害肌肉力量。为了确定这些饮食模式对力量结果的长期影响,有必要对关键营养素进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Are Plant-Based Diets Detrimental to Muscular Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: The increasing interest in plant-based diets (PBDs) results from their beneficial impact on human health and environmental sustainability. However, the effect of PBDs on muscular strength in athletes remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of PBDs on muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets in adult populations.

Methods: The methodology was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure a comprehensive and transparent review process. Four electronic databases-MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus-were searched from their inception to September 2, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the impact of PBDs on the lower body, upper body, and overall muscular strength were included. The risk of bias for the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were used to estimate effect sizes, and multiple random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using an inverse variance model with Paule-Mandel adjustment.

Results: Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 188 participants (46% women; mean age between 20 and 65 years). The meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between PBDs and omnivorous diets in terms of upper body muscular strength (SMD, - 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 0.50 to 0.27; n = 146), lower body muscular strength (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, - 0.31 to 0.67; n = 188), and overall muscular strength (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, - 0.16 to 0.58; n = 188).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that PBDs do not compromise muscular strength compared to omnivorous diets. Further investigation considering key nutrients is necessary to ascertain the long-term effects of these dietary patterns on strength outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Medicine - Open
Sports Medicine - Open SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信