评估电子健康记录数据中抑郁症严重程度指标的可用性:美国两个大型学术医疗保健系统的回顾性研究。

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Heather D Anderson, Kibum Kim, Mingyuan Zhang, Eric Gutierrez, Jodie Malhotra, Casey Tak
{"title":"评估电子健康记录数据中抑郁症严重程度指标的可用性:美国两个大型学术医疗保健系统的回顾性研究。","authors":"Heather D Anderson, Kibum Kim, Mingyuan Zhang, Eric Gutierrez, Jodie Malhotra, Casey Tak","doi":"10.1037/ser0000969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The high prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) combined with low treatment response supports continued research in this area. Electronic health records (EHR) are an important real-world data source for such MDD research, yet indicators of depression severity, a key confounder, are unreliably available. We examined the availability of depression severity indicators in the EHR and identified patient characteristics associated with having a severity indicator available for patients with an MDD diagnosis. We leveraged EHR data from academic health systems in Colorado and Utah from 2016 to 2021 to calculate the proportion of MDD encounters with a severity indicator from two sources in the EHR (diagnosis codes and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 total scores). We compared characteristics between patients with and without severity indicators using chi-square and t tests. We also estimated the proportional agreement between the two sources of severity. Among 1.55 million encounters with an MDD diagnosis from 2016 to 2021, 38% had a severity indicator available from the diagnosis code or Patient Health Questionnaire-9 total score. Availability increased from 28% in 2016 to 47% in 2021. Overall agreement was low at the MDD encounter level. Hispanic patients and those with anxiety, bipolar disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and substance use disorder were more likely to have a severity indicator. While availability of depression severity in EHR data is increasing, it remains low. Researchers wanting to use depression severity data from the EHR should be cognizant of the potential impact of missing severity on their research and be cautious about using diagnosis codes and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores as indicators of severity in isolation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing availability of depression severity indicators in electronic health record data: A retrospective study in two large academic health care systems in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Heather D Anderson, Kibum Kim, Mingyuan Zhang, Eric Gutierrez, Jodie Malhotra, Casey Tak\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ser0000969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The high prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) combined with low treatment response supports continued research in this area. Electronic health records (EHR) are an important real-world data source for such MDD research, yet indicators of depression severity, a key confounder, are unreliably available. We examined the availability of depression severity indicators in the EHR and identified patient characteristics associated with having a severity indicator available for patients with an MDD diagnosis. We leveraged EHR data from academic health systems in Colorado and Utah from 2016 to 2021 to calculate the proportion of MDD encounters with a severity indicator from two sources in the EHR (diagnosis codes and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 total scores). We compared characteristics between patients with and without severity indicators using chi-square and t tests. We also estimated the proportional agreement between the two sources of severity. Among 1.55 million encounters with an MDD diagnosis from 2016 to 2021, 38% had a severity indicator available from the diagnosis code or Patient Health Questionnaire-9 total score. Availability increased from 28% in 2016 to 47% in 2021. Overall agreement was low at the MDD encounter level. Hispanic patients and those with anxiety, bipolar disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and substance use disorder were more likely to have a severity indicator. While availability of depression severity in EHR data is increasing, it remains low. Researchers wanting to use depression severity data from the EHR should be cognizant of the potential impact of missing severity on their research and be cautious about using diagnosis codes and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores as indicators of severity in isolation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Services\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000969\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000969","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重度抑郁障碍(MDD)的高患病率加上低治疗反应支持了这一领域的持续研究。电子健康记录(EHR)是此类重度抑郁症研究的重要现实数据来源,但抑郁症严重程度的指标(一个关键混杂因素)并不可靠。我们检查了EHR中抑郁症严重程度指标的可用性,并确定了与重度抑郁症诊断患者的严重程度指标相关的患者特征。我们利用2016年至2021年来自科罗拉多州和犹他州学术卫生系统的电子病历数据,计算电子病历中两个来源(诊断代码和患者健康问卷-9总分)的严重程度指标的MDD遭遇比例。我们使用卡方检验和t检验比较有和没有严重程度指标的患者的特征。我们还估计了两种严重性来源之间的比例一致性。在2016年至2021年的155万例重度抑郁症诊断中,38%的患者从诊断代码或患者健康问卷-9总分中获得了严重程度指标。可用性从2016年的28%增加到2021年的47%。在MDD遭遇层面上,总体的一致性很低。西班牙裔患者和那些患有焦虑症、双相情感障碍、创伤后应激障碍、注意力缺陷/多动障碍和物质使用障碍的患者更有可能有一个严重程度指标。虽然电子病历数据中抑郁症严重程度的可用性正在增加,但仍然很低。想要使用电子病历中抑郁症严重程度数据的研究人员应该认识到缺失严重程度对其研究的潜在影响,并且在单独使用诊断代码和患者健康问卷-9分数作为严重程度指标时要谨慎。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing availability of depression severity indicators in electronic health record data: A retrospective study in two large academic health care systems in the United States.

The high prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) combined with low treatment response supports continued research in this area. Electronic health records (EHR) are an important real-world data source for such MDD research, yet indicators of depression severity, a key confounder, are unreliably available. We examined the availability of depression severity indicators in the EHR and identified patient characteristics associated with having a severity indicator available for patients with an MDD diagnosis. We leveraged EHR data from academic health systems in Colorado and Utah from 2016 to 2021 to calculate the proportion of MDD encounters with a severity indicator from two sources in the EHR (diagnosis codes and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 total scores). We compared characteristics between patients with and without severity indicators using chi-square and t tests. We also estimated the proportional agreement between the two sources of severity. Among 1.55 million encounters with an MDD diagnosis from 2016 to 2021, 38% had a severity indicator available from the diagnosis code or Patient Health Questionnaire-9 total score. Availability increased from 28% in 2016 to 47% in 2021. Overall agreement was low at the MDD encounter level. Hispanic patients and those with anxiety, bipolar disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and substance use disorder were more likely to have a severity indicator. While availability of depression severity in EHR data is increasing, it remains low. Researchers wanting to use depression severity data from the EHR should be cognizant of the potential impact of missing severity on their research and be cautious about using diagnosis codes and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores as indicators of severity in isolation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信