帕金森病运动康复中运动意象和动作观察的最新进展:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-02 DOI:10.1177/10538135251325459
Tatiana Salayaran de Aguiar Pettenuzzo, Kátine Marchezan Estivalet, Maria Eduarda Parcianello Cabeleira, Arthur Both Lahude, Natiele Camponogara Righi, Luiza de Oliveira Mendes, Fernanda Cechetti
{"title":"帕金森病运动康复中运动意象和动作观察的最新进展:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Tatiana Salayaran de Aguiar Pettenuzzo, Kátine Marchezan Estivalet, Maria Eduarda Parcianello Cabeleira, Arthur Both Lahude, Natiele Camponogara Righi, Luiza de Oliveira Mendes, Fernanda Cechetti","doi":"10.1177/10538135251325459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMotor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) are promising interventions in the rehabilitation of people with Parkinson's disease (PD), especially in motor symptoms.ObjectiveSystematically review studies using MI and AO protocols to assess motor symptoms in people with PD.MethodsThe search was performed in the principal databases, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and pilot studies published in the last 10 years. Studies should include the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III - motor assessment as the primary outcome. The PEDro Scale was used to assess the methodological quality. Data were reported as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsSix studies were included, 152 participants with PD (63.8% men, with ages ranging from 45.3 to 88 years). In the meta-analysis, no differences were found in the main outcome either in the \"on\" medication state (MD = -0.81; 95% CI = -6.20 to 4.58; <i>p</i> = 0.77; n = intervention: 43/comparator: 43; studies = 4; I2 = 28%) or \"off\" state (MD = 0.53; 95% CI = -2.74 to 3.79; <i>p</i> = 0.75; n = intervention: 47/comparator: 47; studies = 3; I2 = 0).ConclusionThe applicability of MI and AO is diverse, but there is a lack of studies combining both interventions, especially with outcomes for the upper limbs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"438-450"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Updates on Motor Imagery and Action Observation in Parkinson's Disease Motor Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Tatiana Salayaran de Aguiar Pettenuzzo, Kátine Marchezan Estivalet, Maria Eduarda Parcianello Cabeleira, Arthur Both Lahude, Natiele Camponogara Righi, Luiza de Oliveira Mendes, Fernanda Cechetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538135251325459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundMotor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) are promising interventions in the rehabilitation of people with Parkinson's disease (PD), especially in motor symptoms.ObjectiveSystematically review studies using MI and AO protocols to assess motor symptoms in people with PD.MethodsThe search was performed in the principal databases, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and pilot studies published in the last 10 years. Studies should include the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III - motor assessment as the primary outcome. The PEDro Scale was used to assess the methodological quality. Data were reported as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsSix studies were included, 152 participants with PD (63.8% men, with ages ranging from 45.3 to 88 years). In the meta-analysis, no differences were found in the main outcome either in the \\\"on\\\" medication state (MD = -0.81; 95% CI = -6.20 to 4.58; <i>p</i> = 0.77; n = intervention: 43/comparator: 43; studies = 4; I2 = 28%) or \\\"off\\\" state (MD = 0.53; 95% CI = -2.74 to 3.79; <i>p</i> = 0.75; n = intervention: 47/comparator: 47; studies = 3; I2 = 0).ConclusionThe applicability of MI and AO is diverse, but there is a lack of studies combining both interventions, especially with outcomes for the upper limbs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroRehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"438-450\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroRehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135251325459\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135251325459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动图像(MI)和动作观察(AO)是帕金森病(PD)患者康复,特别是运动症状治疗中有前景的干预措施。目的系统回顾使用MI和AO方案评估PD患者运动症状的研究。方法检索主要数据库,包括近10年发表的随机对照试验(RCTs)和试点研究。研究应包括统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)第三部分-运动评估作为主要结果。采用PEDro量表评估方法学质量。数据以平均差(MD)和95%置信区间(CI)报告。结果纳入6项研究,152名PD患者(63.8%为男性,年龄从45.3岁到88岁)。在meta分析中,两组主要转归在“on”用药状态均未发现差异(MD = -0.81;95% CI = -6.20 ~ 4.58;p = 0.77;N =干预组:43人/比较组:43人;研究数= 4;I2 = 28%)或“关闭”状态(MD = 0.53;95% CI = -2.74 ~ 3.79;p = 0.75;N =干预组:47人/比较组:47人;研究数= 3;i2 = 0)。结论MI和AO的适用性是多种多样的,但缺乏将两种干预相结合的研究,特别是对上肢的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Updates on Motor Imagery and Action Observation in Parkinson's Disease Motor Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BackgroundMotor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) are promising interventions in the rehabilitation of people with Parkinson's disease (PD), especially in motor symptoms.ObjectiveSystematically review studies using MI and AO protocols to assess motor symptoms in people with PD.MethodsThe search was performed in the principal databases, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and pilot studies published in the last 10 years. Studies should include the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III - motor assessment as the primary outcome. The PEDro Scale was used to assess the methodological quality. Data were reported as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).ResultsSix studies were included, 152 participants with PD (63.8% men, with ages ranging from 45.3 to 88 years). In the meta-analysis, no differences were found in the main outcome either in the "on" medication state (MD = -0.81; 95% CI = -6.20 to 4.58; p = 0.77; n = intervention: 43/comparator: 43; studies = 4; I2 = 28%) or "off" state (MD = 0.53; 95% CI = -2.74 to 3.79; p = 0.75; n = intervention: 47/comparator: 47; studies = 3; I2 = 0).ConclusionThe applicability of MI and AO is diverse, but there is a lack of studies combining both interventions, especially with outcomes for the upper limbs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信