比较大前庭神经鞘瘤手术中半坐位与侧卧位的手术结果:一项随机临床试验。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Gang Song, Binghan Zhang, Yuanchen Tang, Haoming Geng, Xiaolong Wu, Yiqiang Zhou, Jiantao Liang
{"title":"比较大前庭神经鞘瘤手术中半坐位与侧卧位的手术结果:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Gang Song, Binghan Zhang, Yuanchen Tang, Haoming Geng, Xiaolong Wu, Yiqiang Zhou, Jiantao Liang","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03624-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The choice between the semisitting position (SSP) and the lateral position (LP) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery remains a topic of debate, particularly for large tumors, and high-quality evidence is limited. This study aimed to prospectively determine the optimal surgical position for VS with a diameter of ≥ 3 cm. This analysis is based on a randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of VS surgery in SSP versus LP. Outcomes included the extent of resection, functional results, complications, and health economics. A total of 115 consecutive patients with large VS were prospectively enrolled between December 2019 and November 2023 (SSP: 58, LP: 57). The gross-total resection (GTR) rate was significantly higher in the SSP group compared to the LP group (P = 0.026). There was no significant difference in facial nerve (FN) function between the groups 7 days post-operation; however, FN function was superior in the LP group after 1 year. Preoperative preparation duration and craniotomy durations in the SSP group were significantly longer, while overall operative time, tumor resection, and cranial closure durations showed no significant differences between the groups. In terms of health economics, patients in the SSP group had longer hospital stays and higher hospitalization costs. This study demonstrated that SSP offers advantages in achieving higher GTR rates. However, it does not provide any significant benefit in preserving facial nerve function. Given the elevated risks of VAE, SSP should primarily be considered for patients in good physical condition. Furthermore, patients in the SSP group required more extensive preoperative evaluations and intensive monitoring, resulting in longer hospital stays and increased costs. The financial implications of hospitalization should also be taken into account.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing surgical outcomes of the semisitting versus lateral position in large vestibular schwannoma surgery: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Gang Song, Binghan Zhang, Yuanchen Tang, Haoming Geng, Xiaolong Wu, Yiqiang Zhou, Jiantao Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-025-03624-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The choice between the semisitting position (SSP) and the lateral position (LP) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery remains a topic of debate, particularly for large tumors, and high-quality evidence is limited. This study aimed to prospectively determine the optimal surgical position for VS with a diameter of ≥ 3 cm. This analysis is based on a randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of VS surgery in SSP versus LP. Outcomes included the extent of resection, functional results, complications, and health economics. A total of 115 consecutive patients with large VS were prospectively enrolled between December 2019 and November 2023 (SSP: 58, LP: 57). The gross-total resection (GTR) rate was significantly higher in the SSP group compared to the LP group (P = 0.026). There was no significant difference in facial nerve (FN) function between the groups 7 days post-operation; however, FN function was superior in the LP group after 1 year. Preoperative preparation duration and craniotomy durations in the SSP group were significantly longer, while overall operative time, tumor resection, and cranial closure durations showed no significant differences between the groups. In terms of health economics, patients in the SSP group had longer hospital stays and higher hospitalization costs. This study demonstrated that SSP offers advantages in achieving higher GTR rates. However, it does not provide any significant benefit in preserving facial nerve function. Given the elevated risks of VAE, SSP should primarily be considered for patients in good physical condition. Furthermore, patients in the SSP group required more extensive preoperative evaluations and intensive monitoring, resulting in longer hospital stays and increased costs. The financial implications of hospitalization should also be taken into account.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03624-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03624-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)手术的半坐位(SSP)和侧卧位(LP)的选择仍然是一个有争议的话题,特别是对于大肿瘤,高质量的证据是有限的。本研究旨在前瞻性确定直径≥3cm的VS的最佳手术体位。该分析基于一项随机临床试验,评估VS手术治疗SSP和LP的有效性和安全性。结果包括切除程度、功能结果、并发症和健康经济学。在2019年12月至2023年11月期间,共有115名连续的大VS患者前瞻性入组(SSP: 58, LP: 57)。SSP组总切除(GTR)率显著高于LP组(P = 0.026)。术后7 d,两组患者面神经功能差异无统计学意义;而LP组1年后FN功能更佳。SSP组术前准备时间和开颅时间明显更长,而两组总手术时间、肿瘤切除时间、合颅时间差异无统计学意义。在卫生经济学方面,SSP组患者住院时间更长,住院费用更高。这项研究表明,SSP在实现更高的GTR率方面具有优势。然而,它并没有提供任何显着的好处,以保持面部神经功能。考虑到VAE风险增高,应首先考虑身体状况良好的患者使用SSP。此外,SSP组患者需要更广泛的术前评估和密切监测,导致住院时间更长,费用增加。还应考虑到住院所涉经费问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing surgical outcomes of the semisitting versus lateral position in large vestibular schwannoma surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

The choice between the semisitting position (SSP) and the lateral position (LP) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery remains a topic of debate, particularly for large tumors, and high-quality evidence is limited. This study aimed to prospectively determine the optimal surgical position for VS with a diameter of ≥ 3 cm. This analysis is based on a randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of VS surgery in SSP versus LP. Outcomes included the extent of resection, functional results, complications, and health economics. A total of 115 consecutive patients with large VS were prospectively enrolled between December 2019 and November 2023 (SSP: 58, LP: 57). The gross-total resection (GTR) rate was significantly higher in the SSP group compared to the LP group (P = 0.026). There was no significant difference in facial nerve (FN) function between the groups 7 days post-operation; however, FN function was superior in the LP group after 1 year. Preoperative preparation duration and craniotomy durations in the SSP group were significantly longer, while overall operative time, tumor resection, and cranial closure durations showed no significant differences between the groups. In terms of health economics, patients in the SSP group had longer hospital stays and higher hospitalization costs. This study demonstrated that SSP offers advantages in achieving higher GTR rates. However, it does not provide any significant benefit in preserving facial nerve function. Given the elevated risks of VAE, SSP should primarily be considered for patients in good physical condition. Furthermore, patients in the SSP group required more extensive preoperative evaluations and intensive monitoring, resulting in longer hospital stays and increased costs. The financial implications of hospitalization should also be taken into account.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信