Marta Mosca, Laurent Arnaud, Anca Askanase, Coburn Hobar, Brandon Becker, Shalabh Singhal, Subhashis Banerjee, Samantha Pomponi, Jiyoon Choi, Vibeke Strand
{"title":"Deucravacitinib，一种口服，选择性，变构，酪氨酸激酶2抑制剂，用于活动性SLE患者：在一项II期随机试验中对患者报告的结果的疗效","authors":"Marta Mosca, Laurent Arnaud, Anca Askanase, Coburn Hobar, Brandon Becker, Shalabh Singhal, Subhashis Banerjee, Samantha Pomponi, Jiyoon Choi, Vibeke Strand","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2025-001517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In PAISLEY, a 48-week, phase II, randomised controlled trial that assessed deucravacitinib in patients with active SLE, all primary and secondary endpoints were met with the deucravacitinib 3 mg two times per day dose. Changes in patient-reported outcomes, collected as exploratory endpoints, were evaluated in this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with SLE (n=363) were randomised to placebo (n=90) or deucravacitinib 3 mg two times per day (n=91), 6 mg two times per day (n=93) or 12 mg once daily (n=89). Patients assessed pain levels on a Numeric Rating Scale and completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue Short Form 7a and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at scheduled intervals. These outcomes were stratified by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) response. Missing data were imputed using control-based pattern imputation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At week 48, greater mean improvement in pain and fatigue scores from day 1 were reported across all deucravacitinib dose groups compared with placebo. Regardless of treatment group, SRI-4 and BICLA responders reported greater improvements in pain and fatigue than non-responders at week 48. Additionally, deucravacitinib-treated patients generally saw greater SRI-4 and BICLA response rates than placebo-treated patients. Pain decreased by 1.3 points vs 2.2-2.3 points and fatigue scores decreased by 3.4 points vs 5.9-7.3 points in the placebo versus deucravacitinib dose groups, respectively. Mean SF-36 physical scores were 41.5 vs ≥44.6 and mean SF-36 mental scores were 45.2 vs ≥46.3 with placebo versus deucravacitinib dose groups, respectively. A greater proportion of patients receiving deucravacitinib also reported clinically meaningful improvements in SF-36 scores compared with placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with SLE experienced greater improvements in pain, fatigue and health-related quality-of-life scores at week 48 with deucravacitinib versus placebo treatment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03252587.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric, tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in patients with active SLE: efficacy on patient-reported outcomes in a phase II randomised trial.\",\"authors\":\"Marta Mosca, Laurent Arnaud, Anca Askanase, Coburn Hobar, Brandon Becker, Shalabh Singhal, Subhashis Banerjee, Samantha Pomponi, Jiyoon Choi, Vibeke Strand\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/lupus-2025-001517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In PAISLEY, a 48-week, phase II, randomised controlled trial that assessed deucravacitinib in patients with active SLE, all primary and secondary endpoints were met with the deucravacitinib 3 mg two times per day dose. Changes in patient-reported outcomes, collected as exploratory endpoints, were evaluated in this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with SLE (n=363) were randomised to placebo (n=90) or deucravacitinib 3 mg two times per day (n=91), 6 mg two times per day (n=93) or 12 mg once daily (n=89). Patients assessed pain levels on a Numeric Rating Scale and completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue Short Form 7a and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at scheduled intervals. These outcomes were stratified by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) response. Missing data were imputed using control-based pattern imputation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At week 48, greater mean improvement in pain and fatigue scores from day 1 were reported across all deucravacitinib dose groups compared with placebo. Regardless of treatment group, SRI-4 and BICLA responders reported greater improvements in pain and fatigue than non-responders at week 48. Additionally, deucravacitinib-treated patients generally saw greater SRI-4 and BICLA response rates than placebo-treated patients. Pain decreased by 1.3 points vs 2.2-2.3 points and fatigue scores decreased by 3.4 points vs 5.9-7.3 points in the placebo versus deucravacitinib dose groups, respectively. Mean SF-36 physical scores were 41.5 vs ≥44.6 and mean SF-36 mental scores were 45.2 vs ≥46.3 with placebo versus deucravacitinib dose groups, respectively. A greater proportion of patients receiving deucravacitinib also reported clinically meaningful improvements in SF-36 scores compared with placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with SLE experienced greater improvements in pain, fatigue and health-related quality-of-life scores at week 48 with deucravacitinib versus placebo treatment.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03252587.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142172/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2025-001517\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2025-001517","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric, tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in patients with active SLE: efficacy on patient-reported outcomes in a phase II randomised trial.
Objective: In PAISLEY, a 48-week, phase II, randomised controlled trial that assessed deucravacitinib in patients with active SLE, all primary and secondary endpoints were met with the deucravacitinib 3 mg two times per day dose. Changes in patient-reported outcomes, collected as exploratory endpoints, were evaluated in this study.
Methods: Patients with SLE (n=363) were randomised to placebo (n=90) or deucravacitinib 3 mg two times per day (n=91), 6 mg two times per day (n=93) or 12 mg once daily (n=89). Patients assessed pain levels on a Numeric Rating Scale and completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue Short Form 7a and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) at scheduled intervals. These outcomes were stratified by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) response. Missing data were imputed using control-based pattern imputation.
Results: At week 48, greater mean improvement in pain and fatigue scores from day 1 were reported across all deucravacitinib dose groups compared with placebo. Regardless of treatment group, SRI-4 and BICLA responders reported greater improvements in pain and fatigue than non-responders at week 48. Additionally, deucravacitinib-treated patients generally saw greater SRI-4 and BICLA response rates than placebo-treated patients. Pain decreased by 1.3 points vs 2.2-2.3 points and fatigue scores decreased by 3.4 points vs 5.9-7.3 points in the placebo versus deucravacitinib dose groups, respectively. Mean SF-36 physical scores were 41.5 vs ≥44.6 and mean SF-36 mental scores were 45.2 vs ≥46.3 with placebo versus deucravacitinib dose groups, respectively. A greater proportion of patients receiving deucravacitinib also reported clinically meaningful improvements in SF-36 scores compared with placebo.
Conclusion: Patients with SLE experienced greater improvements in pain, fatigue and health-related quality-of-life scores at week 48 with deucravacitinib versus placebo treatment.
期刊介绍：
Lupus Science & Medicine is a global, peer reviewed, open access online journal that provides a central point for publication of basic, clinical, translational, and epidemiological studies of all aspects of lupus and related diseases. It is the first lupus-specific open access journal in the world and was developed in response to the need for a barrier-free forum for publication of groundbreaking studies in lupus. The journal publishes research on lupus from fields including, but not limited to: rheumatology, dermatology, nephrology, immunology, pediatrics, cardiology, hepatology, pulmonology, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
