检查介入性疼痛管理人员控制物质协议教育对慢性非癌性鞘内给药装置阿片类药物治疗患者的影响:回顾性回顾

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-05-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S521458
Chelsey Hoffmann, Trina McDonald, Becky Gladis, Michael E Schatman, Thomas P Pittelkow
{"title":"检查介入性疼痛管理人员控制物质协议教育对慢性非癌性鞘内给药装置阿片类药物治疗患者的影响:回顾性回顾","authors":"Chelsey Hoffmann, Trina McDonald, Becky Gladis, Michael E Schatman, Thomas P Pittelkow","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S521458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) are effective tools for the management of chronic non-cancer pain, cancer-associated pain, and spasticity. Given the overall risks of opioid medications, it is imperative that IDDS opioid-infusion patients receive education regarding the risks versus benefits of their intrathecal opioid medications and that controlled substance agreements (CSAs) are utilized to both educate patients and hold them accountable for keeping IDDS programming visits, refill appointments, or other IDDS maintenance appointments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective electronic medical record (EMR) review study was conducted at an interventional pain management practice, quantifying the number of non-cancer chronic pain IDDS opioid therapy patients with signed CSAs. An educational intervention was conducted to increase staff awareness regarding compliance with CSAs and the location of proper CSA documentation within the EMR. Follow-up EMR review and provider knowledge assessment surveys were deployed to assess the success of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Staff knowledge of CSAs increased from 14.3% (3/21) to 45.5% (10/22) following CSA education while their ability to locate CSAs within the EMR also increased from 38.1% (8/21) to 40.9% (9/22). Post-education intervention, rates of CSA documentation improved from 4.5% to 74.5%. Lastly, there was a 39.5% reduction in rescheduled IDDS appointments within the patient population studied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest potentially profound impacts that a simple education intervention can have on staff knowledge and compliance with CSA documentation for patients receiving IDDS opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain. Furthermore, implementation of CSAs for this patient population may be associated with a decrease in the number of missed, no-show, or rescheduled IDDS maintenance appointments, which have important patient safety implications. Further research is warranted to investigate the impact of CSA compliance on adverse patient outcomes and the potential cost-savings practices with required CSAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"2699-2706"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Effects of Interventional Pain Management Staff Controlled Substance Agreement Education for Patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Intrathecal Drug Delivery Device Opioid Therapy: A Retrospective Review.\",\"authors\":\"Chelsey Hoffmann, Trina McDonald, Becky Gladis, Michael E Schatman, Thomas P Pittelkow\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S521458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) are effective tools for the management of chronic non-cancer pain, cancer-associated pain, and spasticity. Given the overall risks of opioid medications, it is imperative that IDDS opioid-infusion patients receive education regarding the risks versus benefits of their intrathecal opioid medications and that controlled substance agreements (CSAs) are utilized to both educate patients and hold them accountable for keeping IDDS programming visits, refill appointments, or other IDDS maintenance appointments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective electronic medical record (EMR) review study was conducted at an interventional pain management practice, quantifying the number of non-cancer chronic pain IDDS opioid therapy patients with signed CSAs. An educational intervention was conducted to increase staff awareness regarding compliance with CSAs and the location of proper CSA documentation within the EMR. Follow-up EMR review and provider knowledge assessment surveys were deployed to assess the success of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Staff knowledge of CSAs increased from 14.3% (3/21) to 45.5% (10/22) following CSA education while their ability to locate CSAs within the EMR also increased from 38.1% (8/21) to 40.9% (9/22). Post-education intervention, rates of CSA documentation improved from 4.5% to 74.5%. Lastly, there was a 39.5% reduction in rescheduled IDDS appointments within the patient population studied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest potentially profound impacts that a simple education intervention can have on staff knowledge and compliance with CSA documentation for patients receiving IDDS opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain. Furthermore, implementation of CSAs for this patient population may be associated with a decrease in the number of missed, no-show, or rescheduled IDDS maintenance appointments, which have important patient safety implications. Further research is warranted to investigate the impact of CSA compliance on adverse patient outcomes and the potential cost-savings practices with required CSAs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2699-2706\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124305/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S521458\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S521458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鞘内给药系统(IDDS)是治疗慢性非癌性疼痛、癌性疼痛和痉挛的有效工具。鉴于阿片类药物的总体风险,IDDS阿片类药物输注患者必须接受关于鞘内阿片类药物的风险与益处的教育,并利用受控物质协议(csa)对患者进行教育,并使他们对保持IDDS规划就诊、重新预约或其他IDDS维持预约负责。方法:在一家介入性疼痛管理诊所进行回顾性电子病历(EMR)回顾研究,量化非癌性慢性疼痛IDDS阿片类药物治疗中签署csa的患者数量。进行了教育干预,以提高工作人员对遵守CSA和在电子病历中放置适当的CSA文件的认识。后续的电子病历审查和提供者知识评估调查被用来评估干预的成功。结果:接受CSA教育后,员工对CSA的认知从14.3%(3/21)增加到45.5%(10/22),在EMR中定位CSA的能力也从38.1%(8/21)增加到40.9%(9/22)。教育后干预,CSA记录率从4.5%提高到74.5%。最后,在研究的患者群体中,重新安排IDDS预约的人数减少了39.5%。结论:本研究的结果表明,简单的教育干预可以对接受IDDS阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌性疼痛的患者的工作人员知识和CSA文件的依从性产生潜在的深远影响。此外,对这一患者群体实施csa可能与错过、未到或重新安排IDDS维持预约的数量减少有关,这具有重要的患者安全意义。有必要进一步研究CSA依从性对患者不良结果的影响,以及使用所需CSA的潜在成本节约措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining the Effects of Interventional Pain Management Staff Controlled Substance Agreement Education for Patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Intrathecal Drug Delivery Device Opioid Therapy: A Retrospective Review.

Background: Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) are effective tools for the management of chronic non-cancer pain, cancer-associated pain, and spasticity. Given the overall risks of opioid medications, it is imperative that IDDS opioid-infusion patients receive education regarding the risks versus benefits of their intrathecal opioid medications and that controlled substance agreements (CSAs) are utilized to both educate patients and hold them accountable for keeping IDDS programming visits, refill appointments, or other IDDS maintenance appointments.

Methods: A retrospective electronic medical record (EMR) review study was conducted at an interventional pain management practice, quantifying the number of non-cancer chronic pain IDDS opioid therapy patients with signed CSAs. An educational intervention was conducted to increase staff awareness regarding compliance with CSAs and the location of proper CSA documentation within the EMR. Follow-up EMR review and provider knowledge assessment surveys were deployed to assess the success of the intervention.

Results: Staff knowledge of CSAs increased from 14.3% (3/21) to 45.5% (10/22) following CSA education while their ability to locate CSAs within the EMR also increased from 38.1% (8/21) to 40.9% (9/22). Post-education intervention, rates of CSA documentation improved from 4.5% to 74.5%. Lastly, there was a 39.5% reduction in rescheduled IDDS appointments within the patient population studied.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest potentially profound impacts that a simple education intervention can have on staff knowledge and compliance with CSA documentation for patients receiving IDDS opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain. Furthermore, implementation of CSAs for this patient population may be associated with a decrease in the number of missed, no-show, or rescheduled IDDS maintenance appointments, which have important patient safety implications. Further research is warranted to investigate the impact of CSA compliance on adverse patient outcomes and the potential cost-savings practices with required CSAs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信