单水平与双水平横腹平面阻滞下段剖宫产术的临床疗效:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-05-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S520944
Wan-Na Cao, Bei Qiu, Ying Li, Chang-Long Hu, Hua-Cheng Liu, Kai-Ming Yuan, Fang-Yi Wang
{"title":"单水平与双水平横腹平面阻滞下段剖宫产术的临床疗效:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。","authors":"Wan-Na Cao, Bei Qiu, Ying Li, Chang-Long Hu, Hua-Cheng Liu, Kai-Ming Yuan, Fang-Yi Wang","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S520944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) has been widely used for lower-segment cesarean sections (CS). However, traditional single-level TAPB may not provide sufficient analgesia for parturients. This study aimed to validate whether dual-level TAPB could offer more extensive blocking and better clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 114 full-term parturients undergoing lower-segment CS were included in this prospective, randomized, controlled study. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either single-level (group SL) or dual-level (group DL) TAPB. Dual-level TAPB was performed at the umbilical level and the level above the anterior superior iliac spine, while single-level was performed only at the umbilical level. The primary outcome was the proportion of the abdomen successfully blocked 20 minutes after TAPB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty minutes after TAPB, dual-level TAPB resulted in a more extensive cutaneous sensory block compared to single-level TAPB. The difference in the proportion of successfully blocked zones was statistically significant, with 46.9% (43.8%, 53.1%) in group SL <i>versus</i> 71.9% (62.5%, 75.0%) in group DL, <i>p</i> < 0.001. Notably, the proportion of parturients with the \"surgical area\" completely blocked was significantly higher in group DL (94.7%) than in group SL (82.5%) (<i>p</i> = 0.039). Compared to Group SL, the first request for postoperative analgesia was delayed in Group DL by 2.5 hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to traditional single-level TAPB, dual-level TAPB produced more extensive cutaneous sensory block and better postoperative analgesia effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"2689-2698"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125607/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Efficacy of Single- <i>vs</i> Dual-Level Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Lower Segment Cesarean Section: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study.\",\"authors\":\"Wan-Na Cao, Bei Qiu, Ying Li, Chang-Long Hu, Hua-Cheng Liu, Kai-Ming Yuan, Fang-Yi Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S520944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) has been widely used for lower-segment cesarean sections (CS). However, traditional single-level TAPB may not provide sufficient analgesia for parturients. This study aimed to validate whether dual-level TAPB could offer more extensive blocking and better clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 114 full-term parturients undergoing lower-segment CS were included in this prospective, randomized, controlled study. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either single-level (group SL) or dual-level (group DL) TAPB. Dual-level TAPB was performed at the umbilical level and the level above the anterior superior iliac spine, while single-level was performed only at the umbilical level. The primary outcome was the proportion of the abdomen successfully blocked 20 minutes after TAPB.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty minutes after TAPB, dual-level TAPB resulted in a more extensive cutaneous sensory block compared to single-level TAPB. The difference in the proportion of successfully blocked zones was statistically significant, with 46.9% (43.8%, 53.1%) in group SL <i>versus</i> 71.9% (62.5%, 75.0%) in group DL, <i>p</i> < 0.001. Notably, the proportion of parturients with the \\\"surgical area\\\" completely blocked was significantly higher in group DL (94.7%) than in group SL (82.5%) (<i>p</i> = 0.039). Compared to Group SL, the first request for postoperative analgesia was delayed in Group DL by 2.5 hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to traditional single-level TAPB, dual-level TAPB produced more extensive cutaneous sensory block and better postoperative analgesia effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2689-2698\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125607/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S520944\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S520944","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:经腹平面阻滞术(TAPB)在剖宫产下段术(CS)中应用广泛。然而,传统的单剂量TAPB可能不能为产妇提供足够的镇痛。本研究旨在验证双水平TAPB是否可以提供更广泛的阻断和更好的临床结果。方法:在这项前瞻性、随机、对照研究中,共纳入114例接受下节段CS的足月产妇。受试者被随机分配接受单水平(SL组)或双水平(DL组)TAPB。双水平TAPB在脐水平和髂前上棘以上水平进行,单水平TAPB仅在脐水平进行。主要终点是TAPB后20分钟腹部成功阻塞的比例。结果:TAPB后20分钟,双水平TAPB比单水平TAPB导致更广泛的皮肤感觉阻滞。成功阻断区比例,SL组为46.9% (43.8%,53.1%),DL组为71.9%(62.5%,75.0%),差异有统计学意义,p < 0.001。值得注意的是,DL组“手术区”完全阻塞的产妇比例(94.7%)明显高于SL组(82.5%)(p = 0.039)。与SL组相比,DL组首次术后镇痛请求延迟了2.5小时。结论:与传统的单水平TAPB相比,双水平TAPB可产生更广泛的皮肤感觉阻滞,术后镇痛效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Efficacy of Single- vs Dual-Level Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Lower Segment Cesarean Section: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Objective: Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) has been widely used for lower-segment cesarean sections (CS). However, traditional single-level TAPB may not provide sufficient analgesia for parturients. This study aimed to validate whether dual-level TAPB could offer more extensive blocking and better clinical outcomes.

Methods: A total of 114 full-term parturients undergoing lower-segment CS were included in this prospective, randomized, controlled study. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either single-level (group SL) or dual-level (group DL) TAPB. Dual-level TAPB was performed at the umbilical level and the level above the anterior superior iliac spine, while single-level was performed only at the umbilical level. The primary outcome was the proportion of the abdomen successfully blocked 20 minutes after TAPB.

Results: Twenty minutes after TAPB, dual-level TAPB resulted in a more extensive cutaneous sensory block compared to single-level TAPB. The difference in the proportion of successfully blocked zones was statistically significant, with 46.9% (43.8%, 53.1%) in group SL versus 71.9% (62.5%, 75.0%) in group DL, p < 0.001. Notably, the proportion of parturients with the "surgical area" completely blocked was significantly higher in group DL (94.7%) than in group SL (82.5%) (p = 0.039). Compared to Group SL, the first request for postoperative analgesia was delayed in Group DL by 2.5 hours.

Conclusion: Compared to traditional single-level TAPB, dual-level TAPB produced more extensive cutaneous sensory block and better postoperative analgesia effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信