描述医师的最佳多样性培训计划:太平洋脊柱和疼痛协会赞助的一项调查。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-05-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S512263
Julian L Gendreau, Megan M J Bauman, Nolan J Brown, Melanie Alfonzo Horowitz, Sachiv Chakravarti, Yusuf Mehkri, Brittany Grovey, Eric Lee, Gemayel Lee, Eric Cornidez, Harjot S Bhandal, Jason E Pope
{"title":"描述医师的最佳多样性培训计划:太平洋脊柱和疼痛协会赞助的一项调查。","authors":"Julian L Gendreau, Megan M J Bauman, Nolan J Brown, Melanie Alfonzo Horowitz, Sachiv Chakravarti, Yusuf Mehkri, Brittany Grovey, Eric Lee, Gemayel Lee, Eric Cornidez, Harjot S Bhandal, Jason E Pope","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S512263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recently, increasing research has shown inferior outcomes in patients with respect to specific social determinants of health. Therefore, optimizing diversity training given to pain management providers is imperative for physicians to provide culturally competent healthcare and to improve patient outcomes. In this paper, we attempt to describe trends in the Pacific Spine and Pain Society (PSPS) membership to help discover optimal diversity education paradigms for pain management providers by performing a survey on behalf PSPS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was disseminated to all members of the PSPS at the 2022 annual meeting. Opinions were solicited with respect to respondents' demographics, diversity training type, diversity training timing, and how this correlates with a respondent's self-reported confidence in navigating diversity issues in the workplace. Cronbach's alpha test was used to rate internal consistency while logistic regression models were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cronbach's alpha produced a rating of 0.91. A total of 164 individuals responded to the survey, with 115 (70%) being male and 98 (60%) did not consider themselves to be under-represented in medicine. Survey respondents who obtained diversity training post-fellowship (p = 0.004) and with interactive training type (p = 0.010) self-reported to be more confident in handling matters of diversity in the workplace. Respondents who were underrepresented (p = 0.018), females (p = 0.033), practice in the west coast (p = 0.036), academic practice (p=0.031), and non-rural areas (p = 0.033) were also found to be more confident in handling matters of diversity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Practitioners who received diversity training post-fellowship and with interactive and role model formats felt most confident to handle matters of diversity. Underrepresented groups, females, individuals from non-rural practices and individuals from academic practices appear to feel more confident in handling these issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"2739-2750"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12126138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing the Optimal Diversity Training Programs for Physicians: A Survey sponsored by Pacific Spine and Pain Society.\",\"authors\":\"Julian L Gendreau, Megan M J Bauman, Nolan J Brown, Melanie Alfonzo Horowitz, Sachiv Chakravarti, Yusuf Mehkri, Brittany Grovey, Eric Lee, Gemayel Lee, Eric Cornidez, Harjot S Bhandal, Jason E Pope\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S512263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recently, increasing research has shown inferior outcomes in patients with respect to specific social determinants of health. Therefore, optimizing diversity training given to pain management providers is imperative for physicians to provide culturally competent healthcare and to improve patient outcomes. In this paper, we attempt to describe trends in the Pacific Spine and Pain Society (PSPS) membership to help discover optimal diversity education paradigms for pain management providers by performing a survey on behalf PSPS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was disseminated to all members of the PSPS at the 2022 annual meeting. Opinions were solicited with respect to respondents' demographics, diversity training type, diversity training timing, and how this correlates with a respondent's self-reported confidence in navigating diversity issues in the workplace. Cronbach's alpha test was used to rate internal consistency while logistic regression models were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cronbach's alpha produced a rating of 0.91. A total of 164 individuals responded to the survey, with 115 (70%) being male and 98 (60%) did not consider themselves to be under-represented in medicine. Survey respondents who obtained diversity training post-fellowship (p = 0.004) and with interactive training type (p = 0.010) self-reported to be more confident in handling matters of diversity in the workplace. Respondents who were underrepresented (p = 0.018), females (p = 0.033), practice in the west coast (p = 0.036), academic practice (p=0.031), and non-rural areas (p = 0.033) were also found to be more confident in handling matters of diversity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Practitioners who received diversity training post-fellowship and with interactive and role model formats felt most confident to handle matters of diversity. Underrepresented groups, females, individuals from non-rural practices and individuals from academic practices appear to feel more confident in handling these issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2739-2750\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12126138/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S512263\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S512263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:最近,越来越多的研究表明,在特定的健康社会决定因素方面,患者的预后较差。因此,优化给予疼痛管理提供者的多样性培训对于医生提供具有文化竞争力的医疗保健和改善患者预后是必不可少的。在本文中,我们试图描述太平洋脊柱和疼痛协会(PSPS)成员的趋势,以帮助发现疼痛管理提供者的最佳多样性教育范式。方法:在2022年年会上向PSPS的所有成员分发调查问卷。就受访者的人口结构、多元化培训类型、多元化培训时间以及这些因素与受访者在处理工作场所多元化问题时自我报告的信心之间的关系征求了意见。采用Cronbach’s alpha检验评定内部一致性,采用logistic回归模型进行统计分析。结果:Cronbach's alpha评分为0.91。共有164人回应了这项调查,其中115人(70%)是男性,98人(60%)认为自己在医学界的代表性不足。研究结束后接受多元化培训的受访者(p = 0.004)和接受互动式培训的受访者(p = 0.010)自我报告说,他们在处理工作场所的多元化问题时更有信心。代表性不足(p= 0.018)、女性(p= 0.033)、西海岸实践(p= 0.036)、学术实践(p=0.031)和非农村地区(p= 0.033)的受访者也被发现在处理多样性问题方面更有信心。结论:在奖学金结束后接受过多元化培训,并以互动和榜样形式接受培训的从业人员在处理多元化问题时最自信。代表性不足的群体、女性、来自非农村实践的个人和来自学术实践的个人似乎对处理这些问题更有信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterizing the Optimal Diversity Training Programs for Physicians: A Survey sponsored by Pacific Spine and Pain Society.

Introduction: Recently, increasing research has shown inferior outcomes in patients with respect to specific social determinants of health. Therefore, optimizing diversity training given to pain management providers is imperative for physicians to provide culturally competent healthcare and to improve patient outcomes. In this paper, we attempt to describe trends in the Pacific Spine and Pain Society (PSPS) membership to help discover optimal diversity education paradigms for pain management providers by performing a survey on behalf PSPS.

Methods: A survey was disseminated to all members of the PSPS at the 2022 annual meeting. Opinions were solicited with respect to respondents' demographics, diversity training type, diversity training timing, and how this correlates with a respondent's self-reported confidence in navigating diversity issues in the workplace. Cronbach's alpha test was used to rate internal consistency while logistic regression models were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Cronbach's alpha produced a rating of 0.91. A total of 164 individuals responded to the survey, with 115 (70%) being male and 98 (60%) did not consider themselves to be under-represented in medicine. Survey respondents who obtained diversity training post-fellowship (p = 0.004) and with interactive training type (p = 0.010) self-reported to be more confident in handling matters of diversity in the workplace. Respondents who were underrepresented (p = 0.018), females (p = 0.033), practice in the west coast (p = 0.036), academic practice (p=0.031), and non-rural areas (p = 0.033) were also found to be more confident in handling matters of diversity.

Conclusion: Practitioners who received diversity training post-fellowship and with interactive and role model formats felt most confident to handle matters of diversity. Underrepresented groups, females, individuals from non-rural practices and individuals from academic practices appear to feel more confident in handling these issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信