篮球运动员跨水平、跨体位对位跳跃特征分析。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Human Kinetics Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.5114/jhk/196138
Carlos Suárez-Balsera, Davide Ferioli, Elena Marín-Cascales, Vincenzo Rago, Konstantinos Spyrou, Antonio Martínez-Serrano, Debora Di Mauro, José Manuel Marín, Pedro E Alcaraz, Tomás T Freitas
{"title":"篮球运动员跨水平、跨体位对位跳跃特征分析。","authors":"Carlos Suárez-Balsera, Davide Ferioli, Elena Marín-Cascales, Vincenzo Rago, Konstantinos Spyrou, Antonio Martínez-Serrano, Debora Di Mauro, José Manuel Marín, Pedro E Alcaraz, Tomás T Freitas","doi":"10.5114/jhk/196138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to examine different force-time derived variables of the countermovement jump (CMJ) in adult, male basketball players of different competitive levels and playing positions. At the beginning of the pre-season, 78 players from two competitive levels (professional and semi-professional) completed a CMJ test on a force plate. Linear mixed models were used to compare a total of 21 metrics across competitive levels and playing positions. Professional players jumped significantly higher (p = 0.022) than semi-professionals. No differences were observed in the variables related to the eccentric phase. Four concentric phase variables (i.e., absolute peak force [p < 0.001], absolute and relative peak power [p < 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively] and peak velocity [p = 0.036]) were superior in professional in comparison to semi-professional players. Regarding the playing position, centers presented significantly larger deceleration phase duration than guards (p = 0.042). Centers reported higher absolute eccentric peak force than guards (p = 0.013). In the concentric phase, centers reported larger concentric duration than forwards (p = 0.011) and guards (p = 0.002). Guards produced lower absolute peak force compared to centers (p = 0.004) and forwards (p = 0.025). Furthermore, centers were characterized by lower levels of relative peak force (p = 0.013), but higher levels of absolute peak power compared to guards (p = 0.003). In conclusion, jump height, and only four concentric-phase metrics were found to discriminate between competitive levels. Additionally, the eccentric deceleration phase duration, absolute eccentric peak force, concentric duration, absolute and relative peak force and absolute peak power discriminated between playing positions. Practitioners should conduct thorough CMJ analyses and consider these metrics from a performance and talent identification perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":16055,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Kinetics","volume":"96 Spec","pages":"83-95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profiling the Countermovement Jump Characteristics of Basketball Players across Competitive Levels and Playing Positions.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Suárez-Balsera, Davide Ferioli, Elena Marín-Cascales, Vincenzo Rago, Konstantinos Spyrou, Antonio Martínez-Serrano, Debora Di Mauro, José Manuel Marín, Pedro E Alcaraz, Tomás T Freitas\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/jhk/196138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to examine different force-time derived variables of the countermovement jump (CMJ) in adult, male basketball players of different competitive levels and playing positions. At the beginning of the pre-season, 78 players from two competitive levels (professional and semi-professional) completed a CMJ test on a force plate. Linear mixed models were used to compare a total of 21 metrics across competitive levels and playing positions. Professional players jumped significantly higher (p = 0.022) than semi-professionals. No differences were observed in the variables related to the eccentric phase. Four concentric phase variables (i.e., absolute peak force [p < 0.001], absolute and relative peak power [p < 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively] and peak velocity [p = 0.036]) were superior in professional in comparison to semi-professional players. Regarding the playing position, centers presented significantly larger deceleration phase duration than guards (p = 0.042). Centers reported higher absolute eccentric peak force than guards (p = 0.013). In the concentric phase, centers reported larger concentric duration than forwards (p = 0.011) and guards (p = 0.002). Guards produced lower absolute peak force compared to centers (p = 0.004) and forwards (p = 0.025). Furthermore, centers were characterized by lower levels of relative peak force (p = 0.013), but higher levels of absolute peak power compared to guards (p = 0.003). In conclusion, jump height, and only four concentric-phase metrics were found to discriminate between competitive levels. Additionally, the eccentric deceleration phase duration, absolute eccentric peak force, concentric duration, absolute and relative peak force and absolute peak power discriminated between playing positions. Practitioners should conduct thorough CMJ analyses and consider these metrics from a performance and talent identification perspective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Kinetics\",\"volume\":\"96 Spec\",\"pages\":\"83-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121892/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Kinetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/jhk/196138\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Kinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jhk/196138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在探讨不同竞技水平、不同体位的成年男子篮球运动员的反动作跳(CMJ)的力-时间衍生变量。在季前赛开始时,来自两个竞技级别(职业和半职业)的78名球员在测力板上完成了CMJ测试。我们使用线性混合模型来比较竞争水平和比赛位置的21个指标。职业选手比半职业选手跳得更高(p = 0.022)。在与偏心相相关的变量中没有观察到差异。4个同心圆相位变量(即绝对峰值力[p < 0.001]、绝对峰值功率和相对峰值功率[p < 0.001和p = 0.037]和峰值速度[p = 0.036])在职业运动员中优于半职业运动员。在位置上,中锋的减速阶段持续时间显著大于后卫(p = 0.042)。中心组报告的绝对偏心峰值力高于后卫组(p = 0.013)。在同心期,中锋比前锋(p = 0.011)和后卫(p = 0.002)报告的同心期时间更长。后卫产生的绝对峰值力比中锋(p = 0.004)和前锋(p = 0.025)低。此外,与后卫相比,中锋的相对峰值力水平较低(p = 0.013),但绝对峰值力水平较高(p = 0.003)。综上所述,跳跃高度和四个同心相位指标可以区分不同的竞技水平。此外,偏心减速相位持续时间、绝对偏心峰值力、同心持续时间、绝对峰值力和相对峰值力以及绝对峰值功率在不同位置之间具有区别。从业者应该进行彻底的CMJ分析,并从绩效和人才识别的角度考虑这些指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Profiling the Countermovement Jump Characteristics of Basketball Players across Competitive Levels and Playing Positions.

This study aimed to examine different force-time derived variables of the countermovement jump (CMJ) in adult, male basketball players of different competitive levels and playing positions. At the beginning of the pre-season, 78 players from two competitive levels (professional and semi-professional) completed a CMJ test on a force plate. Linear mixed models were used to compare a total of 21 metrics across competitive levels and playing positions. Professional players jumped significantly higher (p = 0.022) than semi-professionals. No differences were observed in the variables related to the eccentric phase. Four concentric phase variables (i.e., absolute peak force [p < 0.001], absolute and relative peak power [p < 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively] and peak velocity [p = 0.036]) were superior in professional in comparison to semi-professional players. Regarding the playing position, centers presented significantly larger deceleration phase duration than guards (p = 0.042). Centers reported higher absolute eccentric peak force than guards (p = 0.013). In the concentric phase, centers reported larger concentric duration than forwards (p = 0.011) and guards (p = 0.002). Guards produced lower absolute peak force compared to centers (p = 0.004) and forwards (p = 0.025). Furthermore, centers were characterized by lower levels of relative peak force (p = 0.013), but higher levels of absolute peak power compared to guards (p = 0.003). In conclusion, jump height, and only four concentric-phase metrics were found to discriminate between competitive levels. Additionally, the eccentric deceleration phase duration, absolute eccentric peak force, concentric duration, absolute and relative peak force and absolute peak power discriminated between playing positions. Practitioners should conduct thorough CMJ analyses and consider these metrics from a performance and talent identification perspective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Kinetics
Journal of Human Kinetics 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Kinetics is an open access interdisciplinary periodical offering the latest research in the science of human movement studies. This comprehensive professional journal features articles and research notes encompassing such topic areas as: Kinesiology, Exercise Physiology and Nutrition, Sports Training and Behavioural Sciences in Sport, but especially considering elite and competitive aspects of sport. The journal publishes original papers, invited reviews, short communications and letters to the Editors. Manuscripts submitted to the journal must contain novel data on theoretical or experimental research or on practical applications in the field of sport sciences. The Journal of Human Kinetics is published in March, June, September and December. We encourage scientists from around the world to submit their papers to our periodical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信