功能动作、跳跃能力和线速度对女子篮球运动员方向速度变化的影响:新方法与传统方法。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Human Kinetics Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.5114/jhk/196780
Francisco J Barrera-Domínguez, Paul A Jones, Bartolomé J Almagro, Jorge Molina-López
{"title":"功能动作、跳跃能力和线速度对女子篮球运动员方向速度变化的影响:新方法与传统方法。","authors":"Francisco J Barrera-Domínguez, Paul A Jones, Bartolomé J Almagro, Jorge Molina-López","doi":"10.5114/jhk/196780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is extensive discourse surrounding the factors influencing performance in change of direction (COD) actions in basketball, given the wide range of tests and methods that exist in the scientific literature for assessing this ability. This study analysed and compared relationships between functional movement, jumping and linear speed performance using two distinct methods of measuring COD performance in female basketball players, while also distinguishing between cut-off angles. Fifty female semi-professional basketball players (age: 23.7 ± 3.81 years, body height: 175.5 ± 7.69 cm; body mass: 64.4 ± 7.88 kg) participated in the assessment, involving various performance and COD tests. COD tests were categorised for each method and angulation into \"low performance\" and \"high performance\" groups, facilitating a Bayesian comparative analysis. For the traditional method of measurement (execution time) vertical (ES ≥ 0.66; BF<sub>10</sub> ≥ 3.50) and horizontal (ES ≥ 0.97; BF<sub>10</sub> ≥ 44.4) variables exhibited significant differences between performance groups across all cutting angles, with faster players performing better in all tests. For the novel approach (COD Deficit) differences between performance groups were only found for horizontal variables, while these differences disappeared for vertical variables. These findings suggest the need for caution when considering the determinants of COD performance, as these relationships are directly dependent on the COD method used. Therefore, female basketball coaches are encouraged to adopt the COD Deficit for assessing this ability, as it isolates COD from other abilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16055,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Kinetics","volume":"96 Spec","pages":"37-51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Functional Movement, Jumping Ability and Linear Speed on Change of Direction Speed in Female Basketball Players: Novel vs. Traditional Approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Francisco J Barrera-Domínguez, Paul A Jones, Bartolomé J Almagro, Jorge Molina-López\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/jhk/196780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is extensive discourse surrounding the factors influencing performance in change of direction (COD) actions in basketball, given the wide range of tests and methods that exist in the scientific literature for assessing this ability. This study analysed and compared relationships between functional movement, jumping and linear speed performance using two distinct methods of measuring COD performance in female basketball players, while also distinguishing between cut-off angles. Fifty female semi-professional basketball players (age: 23.7 ± 3.81 years, body height: 175.5 ± 7.69 cm; body mass: 64.4 ± 7.88 kg) participated in the assessment, involving various performance and COD tests. COD tests were categorised for each method and angulation into \\\"low performance\\\" and \\\"high performance\\\" groups, facilitating a Bayesian comparative analysis. For the traditional method of measurement (execution time) vertical (ES ≥ 0.66; BF<sub>10</sub> ≥ 3.50) and horizontal (ES ≥ 0.97; BF<sub>10</sub> ≥ 44.4) variables exhibited significant differences between performance groups across all cutting angles, with faster players performing better in all tests. For the novel approach (COD Deficit) differences between performance groups were only found for horizontal variables, while these differences disappeared for vertical variables. These findings suggest the need for caution when considering the determinants of COD performance, as these relationships are directly dependent on the COD method used. Therefore, female basketball coaches are encouraged to adopt the COD Deficit for assessing this ability, as it isolates COD from other abilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Kinetics\",\"volume\":\"96 Spec\",\"pages\":\"37-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121889/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Kinetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/jhk/196780\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Kinetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jhk/196780","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于科学文献中存在广泛的测试和方法来评估这种能力,围绕影响篮球中方向改变(COD)动作表现的因素有广泛的讨论。本研究使用两种不同的方法来测量女篮球运动员的COD表现,分析和比较了功能运动、跳跃和线速度表现之间的关系,同时也区分了切断角度。女半职业篮球运动员50名(年龄23.7±3.81岁,身高175.5±7.69 cm;体重:64.4±7.88 kg)参与评估,涉及各项性能及COD测试。每种方法和角度将COD测试分为“低性能”和“高性能”组,便于贝叶斯比较分析。对于传统的测量方法(执行时间)垂直(ES≥0.66;BF10≥3.50)和水平(ES≥0.97;BF10≥44.4)在所有切入角度上表现出显著性差异,速度越快的运动员在所有测试中表现越好。对于新方法(COD赤字),表现组之间的差异仅在水平变量中发现,而这些差异在垂直变量中消失。这些发现表明,在考虑COD性能的决定因素时需要谨慎,因为这些关系直接取决于所使用的COD方法。因此,我们鼓励女篮教练员采用COD赤字来评估女篮的COD能力,因为它将COD与其他能力隔离开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Influence of Functional Movement, Jumping Ability and Linear Speed on Change of Direction Speed in Female Basketball Players: Novel vs. Traditional Approaches.

Influence of Functional Movement, Jumping Ability and Linear Speed on Change of Direction Speed in Female Basketball Players: Novel vs. Traditional Approaches.

There is extensive discourse surrounding the factors influencing performance in change of direction (COD) actions in basketball, given the wide range of tests and methods that exist in the scientific literature for assessing this ability. This study analysed and compared relationships between functional movement, jumping and linear speed performance using two distinct methods of measuring COD performance in female basketball players, while also distinguishing between cut-off angles. Fifty female semi-professional basketball players (age: 23.7 ± 3.81 years, body height: 175.5 ± 7.69 cm; body mass: 64.4 ± 7.88 kg) participated in the assessment, involving various performance and COD tests. COD tests were categorised for each method and angulation into "low performance" and "high performance" groups, facilitating a Bayesian comparative analysis. For the traditional method of measurement (execution time) vertical (ES ≥ 0.66; BF10 ≥ 3.50) and horizontal (ES ≥ 0.97; BF10 ≥ 44.4) variables exhibited significant differences between performance groups across all cutting angles, with faster players performing better in all tests. For the novel approach (COD Deficit) differences between performance groups were only found for horizontal variables, while these differences disappeared for vertical variables. These findings suggest the need for caution when considering the determinants of COD performance, as these relationships are directly dependent on the COD method used. Therefore, female basketball coaches are encouraged to adopt the COD Deficit for assessing this ability, as it isolates COD from other abilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Kinetics
Journal of Human Kinetics 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Human Kinetics is an open access interdisciplinary periodical offering the latest research in the science of human movement studies. This comprehensive professional journal features articles and research notes encompassing such topic areas as: Kinesiology, Exercise Physiology and Nutrition, Sports Training and Behavioural Sciences in Sport, but especially considering elite and competitive aspects of sport. The journal publishes original papers, invited reviews, short communications and letters to the Editors. Manuscripts submitted to the journal must contain novel data on theoretical or experimental research or on practical applications in the field of sport sciences. The Journal of Human Kinetics is published in March, June, September and December. We encourage scientists from around the world to submit their papers to our periodical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信