卵巢内富血小板血浆(PRP)输注似乎有利于低预后的IVF患者;然而,与对照组相比,没有明显的益处可以证实。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Sarah C Rubin, Kaleb Noruzi, Emily Chen, Alexis Greene, Martin Keltz
{"title":"卵巢内富血小板血浆(PRP)输注似乎有利于低预后的IVF患者;然而,与对照组相比,没有明显的益处可以证实。","authors":"Sarah C Rubin, Kaleb Noruzi, Emily Chen, Alexis Greene, Martin Keltz","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03530-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess whether in-office intraovarian PRP injections among patients with a history of a low euploid embryo yield following freeze-all PGT-A IVF cycle improves transferable embryo yield when compared to controls.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective case-control study, between March 2022 and December 2024 where all poor outcome patients who underwent in-office intraovarian PRP injection prior to a repeat freeze-all PGT-A IVF cycle were compared to controls with no intervention between cycles. The primary outcome was transferable embryo yield. Secondary outcomes included: blastocyst yield, aneuploidy rate, and euploid yield.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria and were compared to 309 controls. Mean age for the PRP and control group were 38.3 ± 3.1 and 38.4 ± 3.7 (p = 0.91) respectively. Mean AMH for the PRP group was 1.6 ± 1.1 ng/mL as compared to 1.5 ± 1.0 ng/mL (p = 0.34). Following PRP the blastocyst, euploid and transferable embryo yield increased; however, when compared to controls, there were no differences in IVF outcomes. For patients with an AMH ≥ 1, the euploid yield and transferable embryo yield increased by fivefold; however, there was no difference when compared to the control. For patients with an AMH < 1, there were no differences in euploid or transferable embryo yield following PRP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although there was an improvement in transferable embryos yielded following PRP, no difference was observed compared to the control group, as the control with a poor initial cycle experienced regression to the mean which may also be a source of bias in the PRP group.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) infusion appeared to benefit low prognosis IVF patients; however, when compared to controls, no significant benefit could be confirmed.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah C Rubin, Kaleb Noruzi, Emily Chen, Alexis Greene, Martin Keltz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10815-025-03530-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess whether in-office intraovarian PRP injections among patients with a history of a low euploid embryo yield following freeze-all PGT-A IVF cycle improves transferable embryo yield when compared to controls.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective case-control study, between March 2022 and December 2024 where all poor outcome patients who underwent in-office intraovarian PRP injection prior to a repeat freeze-all PGT-A IVF cycle were compared to controls with no intervention between cycles. The primary outcome was transferable embryo yield. Secondary outcomes included: blastocyst yield, aneuploidy rate, and euploid yield.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria and were compared to 309 controls. Mean age for the PRP and control group were 38.3 ± 3.1 and 38.4 ± 3.7 (p = 0.91) respectively. Mean AMH for the PRP group was 1.6 ± 1.1 ng/mL as compared to 1.5 ± 1.0 ng/mL (p = 0.34). Following PRP the blastocyst, euploid and transferable embryo yield increased; however, when compared to controls, there were no differences in IVF outcomes. For patients with an AMH ≥ 1, the euploid yield and transferable embryo yield increased by fivefold; however, there was no difference when compared to the control. For patients with an AMH < 1, there were no differences in euploid or transferable embryo yield following PRP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although there was an improvement in transferable embryos yielded following PRP, no difference was observed compared to the control group, as the control with a poor initial cycle experienced regression to the mean which may also be a source of bias in the PRP group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03530-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03530-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估在冷冻全PGT-A IVF周期后整倍体胚胎产量低的患者中,与对照组相比,卵巢内PRP注射是否能提高可转移胚胎产量。材料和方法:一项回顾性病例对照研究,在2022年3月至2024年12月期间,将所有在重复冷冻全PGT-A IVF周期之前接受卵巢内PRP注射的不良预后患者与对照组进行比较,周期之间不进行干预。主要结果是可移植胚胎产量。次要结局包括:囊胚产量、非整倍体率和整倍体产量。结果:32例患者符合纳入标准,并与309例对照进行比较。PRP组和对照组的平均年龄分别为38.3±3.1岁和38.4±3.7岁(p = 0.91)。PRP组平均AMH为1.6±1.1 ng/mL,而PRP组为1.5±1.0 ng/mL (p = 0.34)。PRP后囊胚、整倍体和可移植胚的产量增加;然而,与对照组相比,体外受精结果没有差异。对于AMH≥1的患者,整倍体产量和可转移胚胎产量增加了5倍;然而,与对照组相比没有差异。结论:尽管PRP后可移植胚胎的产生有所改善,但与对照组相比没有观察到差异,因为初始周期较差的对照组经历了回归均值,这也可能是PRP组偏倚的一个来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intraovarian platelet-rich plasma (PRP) infusion appeared to benefit low prognosis IVF patients; however, when compared to controls, no significant benefit could be confirmed.

Purpose: To assess whether in-office intraovarian PRP injections among patients with a history of a low euploid embryo yield following freeze-all PGT-A IVF cycle improves transferable embryo yield when compared to controls.

Materials and methods: A retrospective case-control study, between March 2022 and December 2024 where all poor outcome patients who underwent in-office intraovarian PRP injection prior to a repeat freeze-all PGT-A IVF cycle were compared to controls with no intervention between cycles. The primary outcome was transferable embryo yield. Secondary outcomes included: blastocyst yield, aneuploidy rate, and euploid yield.

Results: Thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria and were compared to 309 controls. Mean age for the PRP and control group were 38.3 ± 3.1 and 38.4 ± 3.7 (p = 0.91) respectively. Mean AMH for the PRP group was 1.6 ± 1.1 ng/mL as compared to 1.5 ± 1.0 ng/mL (p = 0.34). Following PRP the blastocyst, euploid and transferable embryo yield increased; however, when compared to controls, there were no differences in IVF outcomes. For patients with an AMH ≥ 1, the euploid yield and transferable embryo yield increased by fivefold; however, there was no difference when compared to the control. For patients with an AMH < 1, there were no differences in euploid or transferable embryo yield following PRP.

Conclusion: Although there was an improvement in transferable embryos yielded following PRP, no difference was observed compared to the control group, as the control with a poor initial cycle experienced regression to the mean which may also be a source of bias in the PRP group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信