多光谱成像增强烧伤深度评估的人工智能算法的改进:扩展的概念验证研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jeffrey E Carter, Jeffrey W Shupp, Herb A Phelan, William Hickerson, Clay J Cockerell, Michael DiMaio, James H Holmes
{"title":"多光谱成像增强烧伤深度评估的人工智能算法的改进:扩展的概念验证研究。","authors":"Jeffrey E Carter, Jeffrey W Shupp, Herb A Phelan, William Hickerson, Clay J Cockerell, Michael DiMaio, James H Holmes","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the advent of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), artificial intelligence is now applicable to visual fields. We used multispectral imaging (MSI) sensors capable of detecting wavelengths outside visible spectra to image burn wounds. The output was converted to pixel-level data and analyzed by an array of CNNs to inform development of a Deep Learning (DL) algorithm for burn assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three burn centers prospectively grouped consenting subjects into those with wounds likely to heal nonoperatively by 21 days, or those benefiting from surgery. Both groups underwent MSI sensor imaging at enrollment and once daily until discharge/excision. Nonoperative subjects were evaluated at 21 days, while operative subjects underwent biopsies. A \"Truthing Panel\" of burn experts created a \"ground truth\" for each wound that was converted to pixel-level data and used to train ten CNNs (eight unique DL algorithms and two ensemble DL algorithms).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1037 MSI images and 161 biopsies were collected from 100 adult and 24 pediatric subjects. The most effective CNN algorithm exhibited an Area Under the Curve of 0.95 (accuracy= 89.29%, sensitivity= 90.51%, specificity= 87.22%) with the covariate \"time-since-injury\" found to be significant (p < 0.0001). Accuracy was lowest, 88.5%, at 1 - 2 days after injury and highest, 93.5%, at 3 - 4 days. The CNN's learning curve predicted an accuracy of 94.04% after enrolling 374 subjects in a future training study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An optimal CNN architecture and the importance of \"time-since-injury\" as a covariate were identified, informing the design/powering of upcoming algorithm Training and Validation Studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refinement of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Enhanced Burn Wound Depth Assessment Using Multispectral Imaging: An Expanded Proof of Concept Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey E Carter, Jeffrey W Shupp, Herb A Phelan, William Hickerson, Clay J Cockerell, Michael DiMaio, James H Holmes\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the advent of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), artificial intelligence is now applicable to visual fields. We used multispectral imaging (MSI) sensors capable of detecting wavelengths outside visible spectra to image burn wounds. The output was converted to pixel-level data and analyzed by an array of CNNs to inform development of a Deep Learning (DL) algorithm for burn assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three burn centers prospectively grouped consenting subjects into those with wounds likely to heal nonoperatively by 21 days, or those benefiting from surgery. Both groups underwent MSI sensor imaging at enrollment and once daily until discharge/excision. Nonoperative subjects were evaluated at 21 days, while operative subjects underwent biopsies. A \\\"Truthing Panel\\\" of burn experts created a \\\"ground truth\\\" for each wound that was converted to pixel-level data and used to train ten CNNs (eight unique DL algorithms and two ensemble DL algorithms).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1037 MSI images and 161 biopsies were collected from 100 adult and 24 pediatric subjects. The most effective CNN algorithm exhibited an Area Under the Curve of 0.95 (accuracy= 89.29%, sensitivity= 90.51%, specificity= 87.22%) with the covariate \\\"time-since-injury\\\" found to be significant (p < 0.0001). Accuracy was lowest, 88.5%, at 1 - 2 days after injury and highest, 93.5%, at 3 - 4 days. The CNN's learning curve predicted an accuracy of 94.04% after enrolling 374 subjects in a future training study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An optimal CNN architecture and the importance of \\\"time-since-injury\\\" as a covariate were identified, informing the design/powering of upcoming algorithm Training and Validation Studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf057\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着卷积神经网络(cnn)的出现,人工智能现在可以应用于视觉领域。我们使用多光谱成像(MSI)传感器,能够检测可见光谱外的波长,对烧伤伤口进行成像。输出被转换为像素级数据,并由一系列cnn进行分析,为烧伤评估的深度学习(DL)算法的开发提供信息。方法:三个烧伤中心前瞻性地将同意的受试者分为伤口可能在21天内非手术愈合的组和手术受益的组。两组均在入组时进行MSI传感器成像,每天一次,直到出院/切除。非手术组在21天进行评估,而手术组则进行活检。由烧伤专家组成的“真相小组”为每个伤口创建了一个“基本真相”,并将其转换为像素级数据,用于训练10个cnn(8个独特的深度学习算法和2个集成深度学习算法)。结果:100名成人和24名儿童共采集MSI影像1037张,活检161张。最有效的CNN算法曲线下面积为0.95(准确率为89.29%,灵敏度为90.51%,特异性为87.22%),协变量“损伤后时间”显著(p < 0.0001)。损伤后1 ~ 2天,准确率最低,为88.5%,3 ~ 4天,准确率最高,为93.5%。CNN的学习曲线在未来的训练研究中招募了374名受试者后,预测准确率为94.04%。结论:确定了最优CNN架构和“受伤后时间”作为协变量的重要性,为即将到来的算法训练和验证研究提供了设计/支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Refinement of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Enhanced Burn Wound Depth Assessment Using Multispectral Imaging: An Expanded Proof of Concept Study.

Background: With the advent of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), artificial intelligence is now applicable to visual fields. We used multispectral imaging (MSI) sensors capable of detecting wavelengths outside visible spectra to image burn wounds. The output was converted to pixel-level data and analyzed by an array of CNNs to inform development of a Deep Learning (DL) algorithm for burn assessment.

Methods: Three burn centers prospectively grouped consenting subjects into those with wounds likely to heal nonoperatively by 21 days, or those benefiting from surgery. Both groups underwent MSI sensor imaging at enrollment and once daily until discharge/excision. Nonoperative subjects were evaluated at 21 days, while operative subjects underwent biopsies. A "Truthing Panel" of burn experts created a "ground truth" for each wound that was converted to pixel-level data and used to train ten CNNs (eight unique DL algorithms and two ensemble DL algorithms).

Results: 1037 MSI images and 161 biopsies were collected from 100 adult and 24 pediatric subjects. The most effective CNN algorithm exhibited an Area Under the Curve of 0.95 (accuracy= 89.29%, sensitivity= 90.51%, specificity= 87.22%) with the covariate "time-since-injury" found to be significant (p < 0.0001). Accuracy was lowest, 88.5%, at 1 - 2 days after injury and highest, 93.5%, at 3 - 4 days. The CNN's learning curve predicted an accuracy of 94.04% after enrolling 374 subjects in a future training study.

Conclusions: An optimal CNN architecture and the importance of "time-since-injury" as a covariate were identified, informing the design/powering of upcoming algorithm Training and Validation Studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信