Jeffrey E Carter, Jeffrey W Shupp, Herb A Phelan, William Hickerson, Clay J Cockerell, Michael DiMaio, James H Holmes
{"title":"多光谱成像增强烧伤深度评估的人工智能算法的改进:扩展的概念验证研究。","authors":"Jeffrey E Carter, Jeffrey W Shupp, Herb A Phelan, William Hickerson, Clay J Cockerell, Michael DiMaio, James H Holmes","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the advent of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), artificial intelligence is now applicable to visual fields. We used multispectral imaging (MSI) sensors capable of detecting wavelengths outside visible spectra to image burn wounds. The output was converted to pixel-level data and analyzed by an array of CNNs to inform development of a Deep Learning (DL) algorithm for burn assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three burn centers prospectively grouped consenting subjects into those with wounds likely to heal nonoperatively by 21 days, or those benefiting from surgery. Both groups underwent MSI sensor imaging at enrollment and once daily until discharge/excision. Nonoperative subjects were evaluated at 21 days, while operative subjects underwent biopsies. A \"Truthing Panel\" of burn experts created a \"ground truth\" for each wound that was converted to pixel-level data and used to train ten CNNs (eight unique DL algorithms and two ensemble DL algorithms).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1037 MSI images and 161 biopsies were collected from 100 adult and 24 pediatric subjects. The most effective CNN algorithm exhibited an Area Under the Curve of 0.95 (accuracy= 89.29%, sensitivity= 90.51%, specificity= 87.22%) with the covariate \"time-since-injury\" found to be significant (p < 0.0001). Accuracy was lowest, 88.5%, at 1 - 2 days after injury and highest, 93.5%, at 3 - 4 days. The CNN's learning curve predicted an accuracy of 94.04% after enrolling 374 subjects in a future training study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An optimal CNN architecture and the importance of \"time-since-injury\" as a covariate were identified, informing the design/powering of upcoming algorithm Training and Validation Studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refinement of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Enhanced Burn Wound Depth Assessment Using Multispectral Imaging: An Expanded Proof of Concept Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey E Carter, Jeffrey W Shupp, Herb A Phelan, William Hickerson, Clay J Cockerell, Michael DiMaio, James H Holmes\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the advent of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), artificial intelligence is now applicable to visual fields. We used multispectral imaging (MSI) sensors capable of detecting wavelengths outside visible spectra to image burn wounds. The output was converted to pixel-level data and analyzed by an array of CNNs to inform development of a Deep Learning (DL) algorithm for burn assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three burn centers prospectively grouped consenting subjects into those with wounds likely to heal nonoperatively by 21 days, or those benefiting from surgery. Both groups underwent MSI sensor imaging at enrollment and once daily until discharge/excision. Nonoperative subjects were evaluated at 21 days, while operative subjects underwent biopsies. A \\\"Truthing Panel\\\" of burn experts created a \\\"ground truth\\\" for each wound that was converted to pixel-level data and used to train ten CNNs (eight unique DL algorithms and two ensemble DL algorithms).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1037 MSI images and 161 biopsies were collected from 100 adult and 24 pediatric subjects. The most effective CNN algorithm exhibited an Area Under the Curve of 0.95 (accuracy= 89.29%, sensitivity= 90.51%, specificity= 87.22%) with the covariate \\\"time-since-injury\\\" found to be significant (p < 0.0001). Accuracy was lowest, 88.5%, at 1 - 2 days after injury and highest, 93.5%, at 3 - 4 days. The CNN's learning curve predicted an accuracy of 94.04% after enrolling 374 subjects in a future training study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An optimal CNN architecture and the importance of \\\"time-since-injury\\\" as a covariate were identified, informing the design/powering of upcoming algorithm Training and Validation Studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf057\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Refinement of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Enhanced Burn Wound Depth Assessment Using Multispectral Imaging: An Expanded Proof of Concept Study.
Background: With the advent of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), artificial intelligence is now applicable to visual fields. We used multispectral imaging (MSI) sensors capable of detecting wavelengths outside visible spectra to image burn wounds. The output was converted to pixel-level data and analyzed by an array of CNNs to inform development of a Deep Learning (DL) algorithm for burn assessment.
Methods: Three burn centers prospectively grouped consenting subjects into those with wounds likely to heal nonoperatively by 21 days, or those benefiting from surgery. Both groups underwent MSI sensor imaging at enrollment and once daily until discharge/excision. Nonoperative subjects were evaluated at 21 days, while operative subjects underwent biopsies. A "Truthing Panel" of burn experts created a "ground truth" for each wound that was converted to pixel-level data and used to train ten CNNs (eight unique DL algorithms and two ensemble DL algorithms).
Results: 1037 MSI images and 161 biopsies were collected from 100 adult and 24 pediatric subjects. The most effective CNN algorithm exhibited an Area Under the Curve of 0.95 (accuracy= 89.29%, sensitivity= 90.51%, specificity= 87.22%) with the covariate "time-since-injury" found to be significant (p < 0.0001). Accuracy was lowest, 88.5%, at 1 - 2 days after injury and highest, 93.5%, at 3 - 4 days. The CNN's learning curve predicted an accuracy of 94.04% after enrolling 374 subjects in a future training study.
Conclusions: An optimal CNN architecture and the importance of "time-since-injury" as a covariate were identified, informing the design/powering of upcoming algorithm Training and Validation Studies.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.