Hui-Fang Zhang, Jia-Wen Chen, Shan-Shan Li, Shi-Wen Wu, Shu Li, Chen-Yi Liu, Chao Cai, Ming-Qin Lu
{"title":"血培养阳性肺炎克雷伯菌肝脓肿的临床特点及危险因素:回顾性研究。","authors":"Hui-Fang Zhang, Jia-Wen Chen, Shan-Shan Li, Shi-Wen Wu, Shu Li, Chen-Yi Liu, Chao Cai, Ming-Qin Lu","doi":"10.2147/IMCRJ.S516742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Positive blood cultures for Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess (KPLA) are associated with an increased risk of extrahepatic organ infections and severe complications such as septicemia and septic shock, leading to higher mortality rates. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with blood culture-positive KPLA and identify potential predictive indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 263 KPLA patients diagnosed at our hospital between January 2019 and December 2023. The objective was to compare clinical characteristics between patients with positive and negative blood cultures and explore factors influencing blood culture positivity. Patients were divided into a blood culture-positive group (study group) and a blood culture-negative group (control group). We compared baseline characteristics, laboratory parameters, ultrasound findings, and complications. Logistic regression identified risk factors, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves assessed the predictive value of inflammatory markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study group exhibited higher ICU admission rates, longer hospital stays, and elevated qSOFA scores (≥2, 15.1 vs 2.6, P=0.003) along with a greater prevalence of diabetes and biliary diseases. Key laboratory values, including glucose, creatinine, procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP), were significantly higher, while albumin and platelet levels were lower (P < 0.05). Complications such as pleural effusion (35.1 vs 12.8, P<0.001), ascites (15.1 vs 2.6, P=0.003), pulmonary infections (27.6 vs 7.7, P<0.001), and extrahepatic abscesses (15.7 vs 5.1, P=0.018) were notably more common. Diabetes was identified as an independent risk factor for blood culture-positive KPLA. Among inflammatory markers, PCT showed the highest predictive value for blood culture positivity (AUC=0.683; cutoff=4.97 ng/mL; sensitivity=70.3%; specificity=62.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with underlying diabetes mellitus are more prone to developing blood culture-positive KPLA. PCT demonstrates better predictive performance for blood culture-positive KPLA, and patients with PCT levels ≥4.97 ng/mL have a higher likelihood of positive blood culture results.</p>","PeriodicalId":14337,"journal":{"name":"International Medical Case Reports Journal","volume":"18 ","pages":"609-619"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors for Blood Culture-Positive Klebsiella pneumoniae Liver Abscess: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hui-Fang Zhang, Jia-Wen Chen, Shan-Shan Li, Shi-Wen Wu, Shu Li, Chen-Yi Liu, Chao Cai, Ming-Qin Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IMCRJ.S516742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Positive blood cultures for Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess (KPLA) are associated with an increased risk of extrahepatic organ infections and severe complications such as septicemia and septic shock, leading to higher mortality rates. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with blood culture-positive KPLA and identify potential predictive indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 263 KPLA patients diagnosed at our hospital between January 2019 and December 2023. The objective was to compare clinical characteristics between patients with positive and negative blood cultures and explore factors influencing blood culture positivity. Patients were divided into a blood culture-positive group (study group) and a blood culture-negative group (control group). We compared baseline characteristics, laboratory parameters, ultrasound findings, and complications. Logistic regression identified risk factors, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves assessed the predictive value of inflammatory markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study group exhibited higher ICU admission rates, longer hospital stays, and elevated qSOFA scores (≥2, 15.1 vs 2.6, P=0.003) along with a greater prevalence of diabetes and biliary diseases. Key laboratory values, including glucose, creatinine, procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP), were significantly higher, while albumin and platelet levels were lower (P < 0.05). Complications such as pleural effusion (35.1 vs 12.8, P<0.001), ascites (15.1 vs 2.6, P=0.003), pulmonary infections (27.6 vs 7.7, P<0.001), and extrahepatic abscesses (15.7 vs 5.1, P=0.018) were notably more common. Diabetes was identified as an independent risk factor for blood culture-positive KPLA. Among inflammatory markers, PCT showed the highest predictive value for blood culture positivity (AUC=0.683; cutoff=4.97 ng/mL; sensitivity=70.3%; specificity=62.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with underlying diabetes mellitus are more prone to developing blood culture-positive KPLA. PCT demonstrates better predictive performance for blood culture-positive KPLA, and patients with PCT levels ≥4.97 ng/mL have a higher likelihood of positive blood culture results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Medical Case Reports Journal\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"609-619\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124461/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Medical Case Reports Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S516742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Medical Case Reports Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S516742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肺炎克雷伯菌肝脓肿(KPLA)血培养阳性与肝外器官感染和严重并发症(如败血症和感染性休克)的风险增加相关,导致更高的死亡率。本研究旨在探讨血培养阳性KPLA患者的临床特征,并寻找潜在的预测指标。方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2023年12月在我院诊断的263例KPLA患者的临床资料。目的是比较血培养阳性和阴性患者的临床特征,探讨影响血培养阳性的因素。将患者分为血培养阳性组(研究组)和血培养阴性组(对照组)。我们比较了基线特征、实验室参数、超声检查结果和并发症。Logistic回归识别危险因素,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估炎症标志物的预测价值。结果:研究组ICU住院率较高,住院时间较长,qSOFA评分升高(≥2,15.1 vs 2.6, P=0.003),糖尿病和胆道疾病患病率较高。关键实验室指标血糖、肌酐、降钙素原(PCT)、c反应蛋白(CRP)显著升高,白蛋白、血小板水平显著降低(P < 0.05)。结论:伴有糖尿病的患者更易发生血培养阳性KPLA。PCT对血培养阳性KPLA的预测效果更好,PCT水平≥4.97 ng/mL的患者血培养阳性的可能性更高。
Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors for Blood Culture-Positive Klebsiella pneumoniae Liver Abscess: A Retrospective Study.
Background: Positive blood cultures for Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess (KPLA) are associated with an increased risk of extrahepatic organ infections and severe complications such as septicemia and septic shock, leading to higher mortality rates. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with blood culture-positive KPLA and identify potential predictive indicators.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 263 KPLA patients diagnosed at our hospital between January 2019 and December 2023. The objective was to compare clinical characteristics between patients with positive and negative blood cultures and explore factors influencing blood culture positivity. Patients were divided into a blood culture-positive group (study group) and a blood culture-negative group (control group). We compared baseline characteristics, laboratory parameters, ultrasound findings, and complications. Logistic regression identified risk factors, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves assessed the predictive value of inflammatory markers.
Results: The study group exhibited higher ICU admission rates, longer hospital stays, and elevated qSOFA scores (≥2, 15.1 vs 2.6, P=0.003) along with a greater prevalence of diabetes and biliary diseases. Key laboratory values, including glucose, creatinine, procalcitonin (PCT), and C-reactive protein (CRP), were significantly higher, while albumin and platelet levels were lower (P < 0.05). Complications such as pleural effusion (35.1 vs 12.8, P<0.001), ascites (15.1 vs 2.6, P=0.003), pulmonary infections (27.6 vs 7.7, P<0.001), and extrahepatic abscesses (15.7 vs 5.1, P=0.018) were notably more common. Diabetes was identified as an independent risk factor for blood culture-positive KPLA. Among inflammatory markers, PCT showed the highest predictive value for blood culture positivity (AUC=0.683; cutoff=4.97 ng/mL; sensitivity=70.3%; specificity=62.8%).
Conclusion: Patients with underlying diabetes mellitus are more prone to developing blood culture-positive KPLA. PCT demonstrates better predictive performance for blood culture-positive KPLA, and patients with PCT levels ≥4.97 ng/mL have a higher likelihood of positive blood culture results.
期刊介绍:
International Medical Case Reports Journal is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal publishing original case reports from all medical specialties. Submissions should not normally exceed 3,000 words or 4 published pages including figures, diagrams and references. As of 1st April 2019, the International Medical Case Reports Journal will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.