地方合作伙伴临床路径和多学科护理管理老年心力衰竭患者的临床过程。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yuki Yamamoto, Noboru Watanabe, Satoru Hasegawa, Chieko Tanaka, Chie Takano, Takahiro Shimizu, Hirohiko Motoki, Mitsuaki Isobe, Koichiro Kuwahara
{"title":"地方合作伙伴临床路径和多学科护理管理老年心力衰竭患者的临床过程。","authors":"Yuki Yamamoto, Noboru Watanabe, Satoru Hasegawa, Chieko Tanaka, Chie Takano, Takahiro Shimizu, Hirohiko Motoki, Mitsuaki Isobe, Koichiro Kuwahara","doi":"10.1536/ihj.24-467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heart failure (HF) is the most critical issue in the medical and long-term care for the elderly because HF is an economic and social burden due to its high prevalence and poor prognosis. General practitioners (GPs) have recently managed patients with chronic HF (CHF) in collaboration with hospital cardiologists. However, little is known about how to collaborate and its outcomes.We have operated a local partnership program using clinical pathway (LPCP) for CHF to facilitate medical and nursing care teamwork in the local community since June 2009. The hospital's multidisciplinary teams evaluate and share patient information periodically. Among 500 patients with available follow-up data as of December 2020, we defined patients who withdrew from the LPCP for reasons other than death as path-dropout (n = 164) and the remaining as path-continue patients (n = 336). The Kaplan-Meier method considering time co-variability of path-dropout, showed a significantly higher hazard ratio of all-cause death in the path-dropout group than in the path-continue group (HR: 5.09; 95% CI: 3.54-7.30, P < 0.001).LPCP provides integrated disease management for CHF by cardiologists and multidisciplinary professionals in the hospital collaborating with local GPs and home care teams. A multivariate analysis identified LPCP as the most important independent predictor of clinical outcome. LPCP may work as an observational tool to distinguish HF patient clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13711,"journal":{"name":"International heart journal","volume":"66 3","pages":"352-362"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Courses of Elderly Patients with Heart Failure Managed by Local Partnership Clinical Pathway and Multidisciplinary Care.\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Yamamoto, Noboru Watanabe, Satoru Hasegawa, Chieko Tanaka, Chie Takano, Takahiro Shimizu, Hirohiko Motoki, Mitsuaki Isobe, Koichiro Kuwahara\",\"doi\":\"10.1536/ihj.24-467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Heart failure (HF) is the most critical issue in the medical and long-term care for the elderly because HF is an economic and social burden due to its high prevalence and poor prognosis. General practitioners (GPs) have recently managed patients with chronic HF (CHF) in collaboration with hospital cardiologists. However, little is known about how to collaborate and its outcomes.We have operated a local partnership program using clinical pathway (LPCP) for CHF to facilitate medical and nursing care teamwork in the local community since June 2009. The hospital's multidisciplinary teams evaluate and share patient information periodically. Among 500 patients with available follow-up data as of December 2020, we defined patients who withdrew from the LPCP for reasons other than death as path-dropout (n = 164) and the remaining as path-continue patients (n = 336). The Kaplan-Meier method considering time co-variability of path-dropout, showed a significantly higher hazard ratio of all-cause death in the path-dropout group than in the path-continue group (HR: 5.09; 95% CI: 3.54-7.30, P < 0.001).LPCP provides integrated disease management for CHF by cardiologists and multidisciplinary professionals in the hospital collaborating with local GPs and home care teams. A multivariate analysis identified LPCP as the most important independent predictor of clinical outcome. LPCP may work as an observational tool to distinguish HF patient clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International heart journal\",\"volume\":\"66 3\",\"pages\":\"352-362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.24-467\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.24-467","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心衰(HF)是老年人医疗和长期护理中最关键的问题,因为心衰发病率高,预后差,是一种经济和社会负担。全科医生(gp)最近与医院心脏病专家合作管理慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者。然而,人们对如何合作及其结果知之甚少。自2009年6月以来,我们为CHF开展了一项使用临床路径(lcp)的当地合作项目,以促进当地社区的医疗和护理团队合作。医院的多学科团队定期评估和共享患者信息。截至2020年12月,在500例可获得随访数据的患者中,我们将因死亡以外的原因退出LPCP的患者定义为路径退出(n = 164),其余为路径继续患者(n = 336)。Kaplan-Meier方法考虑路径退出的时间协变,结果显示路径退出组的全因死亡风险比显著高于路径继续组(HR: 5.09;95% ci: 3.54-7.30, p < 0.001)。lcp由医院的心脏病专家和多学科专业人员与当地全科医生和家庭护理团队合作,为CHF提供综合疾病管理。一项多变量分析确定LPCP是临床结果最重要的独立预测因子。lcpp可以作为一种观察工具来区分心衰患者的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Courses of Elderly Patients with Heart Failure Managed by Local Partnership Clinical Pathway and Multidisciplinary Care.

Heart failure (HF) is the most critical issue in the medical and long-term care for the elderly because HF is an economic and social burden due to its high prevalence and poor prognosis. General practitioners (GPs) have recently managed patients with chronic HF (CHF) in collaboration with hospital cardiologists. However, little is known about how to collaborate and its outcomes.We have operated a local partnership program using clinical pathway (LPCP) for CHF to facilitate medical and nursing care teamwork in the local community since June 2009. The hospital's multidisciplinary teams evaluate and share patient information periodically. Among 500 patients with available follow-up data as of December 2020, we defined patients who withdrew from the LPCP for reasons other than death as path-dropout (n = 164) and the remaining as path-continue patients (n = 336). The Kaplan-Meier method considering time co-variability of path-dropout, showed a significantly higher hazard ratio of all-cause death in the path-dropout group than in the path-continue group (HR: 5.09; 95% CI: 3.54-7.30, P < 0.001).LPCP provides integrated disease management for CHF by cardiologists and multidisciplinary professionals in the hospital collaborating with local GPs and home care teams. A multivariate analysis identified LPCP as the most important independent predictor of clinical outcome. LPCP may work as an observational tool to distinguish HF patient clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International heart journal
International heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
148
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Authors of research articles should disclose at the time of submission any financial arrangement they may have with a company whose product figures prominently in the submitted manuscript or with a company making a competing product. Such information will be held in confidence while the paper is under review and will not influence the editorial decision, but if the article is accepted for publication, the editors will usually discuss with the authors the manner in which such information is to be communicated to the reader.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信