Tim Wiedenmann, Steffen Held, Tobias Morat, Ludwig Rappelt, Eduard Isenmann, Elena Berndsen, Nils-Holger Hopp, Lars Donath
{"title":"不同抗阻训练方式对社区老年人肌肉力量的影响:网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Tim Wiedenmann, Steffen Held, Tobias Morat, Ludwig Rappelt, Eduard Isenmann, Elena Berndsen, Nils-Holger Hopp, Lars Donath","doi":"10.1159/000546346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Resistance training is widely recognized as a valuable method to enhance physical function, reduce the risk of falls, and improve overall health, independence and well-being in older adults. The training can be performed through various modalities of which the comparative effects have not yet been thoroughly elucidated. This network meta-analysis (NMA) therefore aims to compare and rank different resistance training modalities regarding their effects on strength outcomes in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The studies included in this NMA were identified through a comprehensive search across three health-related and biomedical databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus). We included (randomized) controlled trials that assessed the effect of resistance training modes (including: free weight training, machine-based training, bodyweight training, elastic band training, and mixed training) in comparison to each other or to a control condition, focusing on traditional maximal strength outcomes in older individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This NMA includes 102 trials involving 4,754 community-dwelling seniors with a mean age of 70 ± 4 years (range 63-87 years of age). All of the included resistance training modalities yield moderate to large positive effects on strength when compared to a \"no intervention\" control condition. Machine-based training {standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.34 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16; 1.52)} elicits the largest effects, followed by free weight (SMD = 1.15 [95% CI: 0.28; 2.03]), elastic band (SMD = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.49; 1.37]), mixed (SMD = 0.88 [95% CI: 0.51; 1.25]), and bodyweight training (SMD = 0.71 [95% CI: 0.16; 1.26]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine-based training elicits the largest effects with the smallest variance. However, our findings demonstrate that various resistance-training modalities can have large positive effects on strength development in older adults. We suggest that, with adequately chosen load criteria such as training intensity, volume and duration of the training period, the selection of the appropriate resistance training type might depend on individual preference, enjoyability, and practicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12662,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"576-588"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Different Resistance Training Modalities on Muscle Strength in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Tim Wiedenmann, Steffen Held, Tobias Morat, Ludwig Rappelt, Eduard Isenmann, Elena Berndsen, Nils-Holger Hopp, Lars Donath\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000546346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Resistance training is widely recognized as a valuable method to enhance physical function, reduce the risk of falls, and improve overall health, independence and well-being in older adults. The training can be performed through various modalities of which the comparative effects have not yet been thoroughly elucidated. This network meta-analysis (NMA) therefore aims to compare and rank different resistance training modalities regarding their effects on strength outcomes in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The studies included in this NMA were identified through a comprehensive search across three health-related and biomedical databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus). We included (randomized) controlled trials that assessed the effect of resistance training modes (including: free weight training, machine-based training, bodyweight training, elastic band training, and mixed training) in comparison to each other or to a control condition, focusing on traditional maximal strength outcomes in older individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This NMA includes 102 trials involving 4,754 community-dwelling seniors with a mean age of 70 ± 4 years (range 63-87 years of age). All of the included resistance training modalities yield moderate to large positive effects on strength when compared to a \\\"no intervention\\\" control condition. Machine-based training {standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.34 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16; 1.52)} elicits the largest effects, followed by free weight (SMD = 1.15 [95% CI: 0.28; 2.03]), elastic band (SMD = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.49; 1.37]), mixed (SMD = 0.88 [95% CI: 0.51; 1.25]), and bodyweight training (SMD = 0.71 [95% CI: 0.16; 1.26]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine-based training elicits the largest effects with the smallest variance. However, our findings demonstrate that various resistance-training modalities can have large positive effects on strength development in older adults. We suggest that, with adequately chosen load criteria such as training intensity, volume and duration of the training period, the selection of the appropriate resistance training type might depend on individual preference, enjoyability, and practicability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"576-588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546346\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546346","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effects of Different Resistance Training Modalities on Muscle Strength in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Introduction: Resistance training is widely recognized as a valuable method to enhance physical function, reduce the risk of falls, and improve overall health, independence and well-being in older adults. The training can be performed through various modalities of which the comparative effects have not yet been thoroughly elucidated. This network meta-analysis (NMA) therefore aims to compare and rank different resistance training modalities regarding their effects on strength outcomes in older adults.
Methods: The studies included in this NMA were identified through a comprehensive search across three health-related and biomedical databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus). We included (randomized) controlled trials that assessed the effect of resistance training modes (including: free weight training, machine-based training, bodyweight training, elastic band training, and mixed training) in comparison to each other or to a control condition, focusing on traditional maximal strength outcomes in older individuals.
Results: This NMA includes 102 trials involving 4,754 community-dwelling seniors with a mean age of 70 ± 4 years (range 63-87 years of age). All of the included resistance training modalities yield moderate to large positive effects on strength when compared to a "no intervention" control condition. Machine-based training {standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.34 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16; 1.52)} elicits the largest effects, followed by free weight (SMD = 1.15 [95% CI: 0.28; 2.03]), elastic band (SMD = 0.93 [95% CI: 0.49; 1.37]), mixed (SMD = 0.88 [95% CI: 0.51; 1.25]), and bodyweight training (SMD = 0.71 [95% CI: 0.16; 1.26]).
Conclusion: Machine-based training elicits the largest effects with the smallest variance. However, our findings demonstrate that various resistance-training modalities can have large positive effects on strength development in older adults. We suggest that, with adequately chosen load criteria such as training intensity, volume and duration of the training period, the selection of the appropriate resistance training type might depend on individual preference, enjoyability, and practicability.
期刊介绍:
In view of the ever-increasing fraction of elderly people, understanding the mechanisms of aging and age-related diseases has become a matter of urgent necessity. ''Gerontology'', the oldest journal in the field, responds to this need by drawing topical contributions from multiple disciplines to support the fundamental goals of extending active life and enhancing its quality. The range of papers is classified into four sections. In the Clinical Section, the aetiology, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of agerelated diseases are discussed from a gerontological rather than a geriatric viewpoint. The Experimental Section contains up-to-date contributions from basic gerontological research. Papers dealing with behavioural development and related topics are placed in the Behavioural Science Section. Basic aspects of regeneration in different experimental biological systems as well as in the context of medical applications are dealt with in a special section that also contains information on technological advances for the elderly. Providing a primary source of high-quality papers covering all aspects of aging in humans and animals, ''Gerontology'' serves as an ideal information tool for all readers interested in the topic of aging from a broad perspective.