艾氯胺酮/异丙酚与舒芬太尼/异丙酚治疗支气管镜术中低氧血症的比较:一项随机试验

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Drug Design, Development and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-05-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S490423
Xiao Huang, Xueyang Li, Yuan Sun, Anshi Wu, Pan Ai
{"title":"艾氯胺酮/异丙酚与舒芬太尼/异丙酚治疗支气管镜术中低氧血症的比较:一项随机试验","authors":"Xiao Huang, Xueyang Li, Yuan Sun, Anshi Wu, Pan Ai","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S490423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Propofol and sufentanil are the most commonly used anesthetics during bronchoscopy. Esketamine is an s-enantiomer of ketamine racemate and has both sedative and analgesic effects, it does not inhibit respiration and maintains hemodynamic stability. We aimed to compare the intraoperative hypoxemia risk of esketamine/propofol with sufentanil/propofol for patients in bronchoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was an investigator-initiated, single-center, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Patients undergoing bronchoscopy were randomly assigned to receive either sufentanil group (n = 33; sufentanil: 0.2 μg/kg) or esketamine group (n = 33; esketamine: 0.2 mg/kg) for sedation and analgesia. Clinical data, anesthetics usage, incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia, total time of hypoxemia, recovery time, and adverse events were recorded.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>The incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia was significantly lower in the esketamine group than in the sufentanil group (27.2% vs 66.7%, <i>P</i>=0.001, OR=5.333, 95% CI=1.859-15.301). Propofol usage was significantly higher in the esketamine group than in the sufentanil group (t=2.952, <i>P</i>=0.004). The duration of hypoxia was significantly lower in the esketamine group than in the sufentanil group (Z=-3.445, <i>P</i><0.001), and the minimum oxygen saturation (SpO2) was significantly higher than in the sufentanil group (Z=-2.682, <i>P</i>=0.007). Recovery time from anesthesia was significantly lower in the esketamine group than in the sufentanil group (Z=-2.709, <i>P</i>=0.007). No difference was found in adverse reactions between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Esketamine combined with propofol reduced the incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia compared with sufentanil in bronchoscopy. Our results offer the possibility for a novel recommendation for the prevention of intraoperative hypoxemia during bronchoscopy. However, we mentioned the higher propofol use in the esketamine group. Additional clarification is necessary on the indications and the optimal dose of esketamine.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese clinical trial registry: ChiCTR2200058990.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"19 ","pages":"4429-4436"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12126101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Esketamine/Propofol and Sufentanil/Propofol on Intraoperative Hypoxemia During Bronchoscopy: A Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Huang, Xueyang Li, Yuan Sun, Anshi Wu, Pan Ai\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DDDT.S490423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Propofol and sufentanil are the most commonly used anesthetics during bronchoscopy. Esketamine is an s-enantiomer of ketamine racemate and has both sedative and analgesic effects, it does not inhibit respiration and maintains hemodynamic stability. We aimed to compare the intraoperative hypoxemia risk of esketamine/propofol with sufentanil/propofol for patients in bronchoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was an investigator-initiated, single-center, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Patients undergoing bronchoscopy were randomly assigned to receive either sufentanil group (n = 33; sufentanil: 0.2 μg/kg) or esketamine group (n = 33; esketamine: 0.2 mg/kg) for sedation and analgesia. Clinical data, anesthetics usage, incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia, total time of hypoxemia, recovery time, and adverse events were recorded.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>The incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia was significantly lower in the esketamine group than in the sufentanil group (27.2% vs 66.7%, <i>P</i>=0.001, OR=5.333, 95% CI=1.859-15.301). Propofol usage was significantly higher in the esketamine group than in the sufentanil group (t=2.952, <i>P</i>=0.004). The duration of hypoxia was significantly lower in the esketamine group than in the sufentanil group (Z=-3.445, <i>P</i><0.001), and the minimum oxygen saturation (SpO2) was significantly higher than in the sufentanil group (Z=-2.682, <i>P</i>=0.007). Recovery time from anesthesia was significantly lower in the esketamine group than in the sufentanil group (Z=-2.709, <i>P</i>=0.007). No difference was found in adverse reactions between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Esketamine combined with propofol reduced the incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia compared with sufentanil in bronchoscopy. Our results offer the possibility for a novel recommendation for the prevention of intraoperative hypoxemia during bronchoscopy. However, we mentioned the higher propofol use in the esketamine group. Additional clarification is necessary on the indications and the optimal dose of esketamine.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese clinical trial registry: ChiCTR2200058990.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"4429-4436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12126101/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Design, Development and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S490423\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S490423","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:异丙酚和舒芬太尼是支气管镜检查中最常用的麻醉剂。艾氯胺酮是外消旋氯胺酮的s-对映体,具有镇静和镇痛作用,不抑制呼吸,维持血流动力学稳定。我们的目的是比较艾氯胺酮/异丙酚与舒芬太尼/异丙酚对支气管镜患者术中低氧血症的风险。方法:本研究为研究者发起、单中心、随机、双盲临床试验。接受支气管镜检查的患者被随机分配到舒芬太尼组(n = 33;舒芬太尼:0.2 μg/kg)或艾氯胺酮组(n = 33;艾氯胺酮:0.2 mg/kg)用于镇静和镇痛。记录临床资料、麻醉药使用情况、术中低氧血症发生率、低氧血症总时间、恢复时间及不良事件。主要结果:艾氯胺酮组术中低氧血症发生率明显低于舒芬太尼组(27.2% vs 66.7%, P=0.001, OR=5.333, 95% CI=1.859-15.301)。艾氯胺酮组异丙酚使用率明显高于舒芬太尼组(t=2.952, P=0.004)。艾氯胺酮组缺氧持续时间明显低于舒芬太尼组(Z=-3.445, PP=0.007)。艾氯胺酮组麻醉恢复时间明显低于舒芬太尼组(Z=-2.709, P=0.007)。两组患者的不良反应无显著差异。结论:与舒芬太尼相比,艾氯胺酮联合异丙酚可降低支气管镜术中低氧血症的发生率。我们的研究结果为预防支气管镜检查术中低氧血症提供了一种新的建议。然而,我们提到了艾氯胺酮组使用较多的异丙酚。有必要进一步澄清艾氯胺酮的适应症和最佳剂量。试验注册:中国临床试验注册:ChiCTR2200058990。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Esketamine/Propofol and Sufentanil/Propofol on Intraoperative Hypoxemia During Bronchoscopy: A Randomized Trial.

Purpose: Propofol and sufentanil are the most commonly used anesthetics during bronchoscopy. Esketamine is an s-enantiomer of ketamine racemate and has both sedative and analgesic effects, it does not inhibit respiration and maintains hemodynamic stability. We aimed to compare the intraoperative hypoxemia risk of esketamine/propofol with sufentanil/propofol for patients in bronchoscopy.

Methods: This study was an investigator-initiated, single-center, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Patients undergoing bronchoscopy were randomly assigned to receive either sufentanil group (n = 33; sufentanil: 0.2 μg/kg) or esketamine group (n = 33; esketamine: 0.2 mg/kg) for sedation and analgesia. Clinical data, anesthetics usage, incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia, total time of hypoxemia, recovery time, and adverse events were recorded.

Main results: The incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia was significantly lower in the esketamine group than in the sufentanil group (27.2% vs 66.7%, P=0.001, OR=5.333, 95% CI=1.859-15.301). Propofol usage was significantly higher in the esketamine group than in the sufentanil group (t=2.952, P=0.004). The duration of hypoxia was significantly lower in the esketamine group than in the sufentanil group (Z=-3.445, P<0.001), and the minimum oxygen saturation (SpO2) was significantly higher than in the sufentanil group (Z=-2.682, P=0.007). Recovery time from anesthesia was significantly lower in the esketamine group than in the sufentanil group (Z=-2.709, P=0.007). No difference was found in adverse reactions between the two groups.

Conclusion: Esketamine combined with propofol reduced the incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia compared with sufentanil in bronchoscopy. Our results offer the possibility for a novel recommendation for the prevention of intraoperative hypoxemia during bronchoscopy. However, we mentioned the higher propofol use in the esketamine group. Additional clarification is necessary on the indications and the optimal dose of esketamine.

Trial registration: Chinese clinical trial registry: ChiCTR2200058990.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Drug Design, Development and Therapy CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
382
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas. Specific topics covered by the journal include: Drug target identification and validation Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery* Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes) Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes Fragment-based drug discovery Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products** Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing) Preclinical development studies Translational animal models Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways Toxicology Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics Clinical drug evaluation Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信