大麻二酚胶制品:大麻素浓度的LC-MS/MS评价。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Erin D Johnson, Michael W Kilgore, Maribeth Stafford, Makana Randolph, Melissa Glover, Shanna Babalonis
{"title":"大麻二酚胶制品:大麻素浓度的LC-MS/MS评价。","authors":"Erin D Johnson, Michael W Kilgore, Maribeth Stafford, Makana Randolph, Melissa Glover, Shanna Babalonis","doi":"10.1089/can.2024.0167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Hemp and cannabidiol (CBD) products are now widely available for purchase in the United States and in many international jurisdictions. However, these products are largely unregulated (with very few exceptions) and are widely available without restriction. This has created a market in which low-quality and contaminated products are commonplace. The aim of the current study was to analyze the cannabinoid content of 56 selected CBD gummy products. <b>Methods:</b> Gummy-based CBD products from national brands, available for purchase online, were obtained. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used for cannabinoid analysis. Key outcome measures included: (1) concentration of CBD in each product, (2) accuracy of the product labeling regarding CBD concentration, and (3) concentration of Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC) and other cannabinoids of interest (e.g., cannabidivarin and cannabinol) in each product. An exploratory analysis assessed within-product consistency of CBD and THC concentrations (e.g., variation in cannabinoid content from gummy to gummy within a single bottle). <b>Results:</b> The products contained a mean of 21.38 (±11.16) mg CBD per gummy (range: 5.70 - 59.99 mg). In total, 70% of the gummies contained CBD in a concentration that differed by >10% of the dose listed on the packaging. In total, 39% of the products contained Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC and concentrations were highly variable (range: 0.019-0.88 mg Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC/gummy); 9 products (16% of products tested) contained >0.4 mg Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC per gummy. Within-product analysis (<i>n</i> = 10 products) revealed high variability across gummies (coefficient of variation for CBD: 2.1 - 27.1%; Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC: 3.1 - 23.5%). <b>Conclusions:</b> As several studies have demonstrated, unregulated CBD product packaging is not an accurate indication of the product constituents. This study further confirms that CBD products do not have reliable CBD concentrations-both relative to the dose listed on the label and among individual gummies within the same bottle. These products also frequently contain Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC (and occasionally Δ<sup>8</sup>-THC), often unbeknownst to the consumer. The results of this study support the growing body of literature suggesting the necessity of CBD product regulation to ensure customer health and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":9386,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cannabidiol Gummy Products: LC-MS/MS Assessment of Cannabinoid Concentrations.\",\"authors\":\"Erin D Johnson, Michael W Kilgore, Maribeth Stafford, Makana Randolph, Melissa Glover, Shanna Babalonis\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/can.2024.0167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Hemp and cannabidiol (CBD) products are now widely available for purchase in the United States and in many international jurisdictions. However, these products are largely unregulated (with very few exceptions) and are widely available without restriction. This has created a market in which low-quality and contaminated products are commonplace. The aim of the current study was to analyze the cannabinoid content of 56 selected CBD gummy products. <b>Methods:</b> Gummy-based CBD products from national brands, available for purchase online, were obtained. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used for cannabinoid analysis. Key outcome measures included: (1) concentration of CBD in each product, (2) accuracy of the product labeling regarding CBD concentration, and (3) concentration of Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC) and other cannabinoids of interest (e.g., cannabidivarin and cannabinol) in each product. An exploratory analysis assessed within-product consistency of CBD and THC concentrations (e.g., variation in cannabinoid content from gummy to gummy within a single bottle). <b>Results:</b> The products contained a mean of 21.38 (±11.16) mg CBD per gummy (range: 5.70 - 59.99 mg). In total, 70% of the gummies contained CBD in a concentration that differed by >10% of the dose listed on the packaging. In total, 39% of the products contained Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC and concentrations were highly variable (range: 0.019-0.88 mg Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC/gummy); 9 products (16% of products tested) contained >0.4 mg Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC per gummy. Within-product analysis (<i>n</i> = 10 products) revealed high variability across gummies (coefficient of variation for CBD: 2.1 - 27.1%; Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC: 3.1 - 23.5%). <b>Conclusions:</b> As several studies have demonstrated, unregulated CBD product packaging is not an accurate indication of the product constituents. This study further confirms that CBD products do not have reliable CBD concentrations-both relative to the dose listed on the label and among individual gummies within the same bottle. These products also frequently contain Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC (and occasionally Δ<sup>8</sup>-THC), often unbeknownst to the consumer. The results of this study support the growing body of literature suggesting the necessity of CBD product regulation to ensure customer health and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0167\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2024.0167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大麻和大麻二酚(CBD)产品现在可以在美国和许多国际司法管辖区广泛购买。然而,这些产品在很大程度上是不受监管的(只有极少数例外),并且可以不受限制地广泛使用。这造成了一个低质量和受污染产品随处可见的市场。本研究的目的是分析56种选定的CBD软糖产品的大麻素含量。方法:从网上可购买的全国知名品牌中获得胶基CBD产品。采用液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)分析大麻素。关键结果测量包括:(1)每种产品中CBD的浓度,(2)关于CBD浓度的产品标签的准确性,以及(3)每种产品中Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC)和其他感兴趣的大麻素(例如,大麻二酚和大麻酚)的浓度。一项探索性分析评估了产品内CBD和四氢大麻酚浓度的一致性(例如,在一个瓶子里,大麻素含量从一种胶到另一种胶的变化)。结果:产品中CBD含量平均为21.38(±11.16)mg /胶(范围:5.70 ~ 59.99 mg)。总的来说,70%的口香糖含有CBD,其浓度与包装上列出的剂量相差100 - 10%。总共有39%的产品含有Δ9-THC,浓度变化很大(范围:0.019-0.88 mg Δ9-THC/gummy);9种产品(16%的测试产品)含有>.4毫克Δ9-THC。产品内分析(n = 10个产品)揭示了不同口香糖的高变异性(CBD变异系数:2.1 - 27.1%;Δ9-thc: 3.1 - 23.5%)。结论:正如几项研究表明,不受管制的CBD产品包装并不能准确反映产品成分。这项研究进一步证实,CBD产品没有可靠的CBD浓度——无论是相对于标签上列出的剂量还是同一瓶中单个口香糖的浓度。这些产品还经常含有Δ9-THC(偶尔含有Δ8-THC),消费者通常不知道。这项研究的结果支持了越来越多的文献提出的CBD产品监管的必要性,以确保客户的健康和安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cannabidiol Gummy Products: LC-MS/MS Assessment of Cannabinoid Concentrations.

Background: Hemp and cannabidiol (CBD) products are now widely available for purchase in the United States and in many international jurisdictions. However, these products are largely unregulated (with very few exceptions) and are widely available without restriction. This has created a market in which low-quality and contaminated products are commonplace. The aim of the current study was to analyze the cannabinoid content of 56 selected CBD gummy products. Methods: Gummy-based CBD products from national brands, available for purchase online, were obtained. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used for cannabinoid analysis. Key outcome measures included: (1) concentration of CBD in each product, (2) accuracy of the product labeling regarding CBD concentration, and (3) concentration of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and other cannabinoids of interest (e.g., cannabidivarin and cannabinol) in each product. An exploratory analysis assessed within-product consistency of CBD and THC concentrations (e.g., variation in cannabinoid content from gummy to gummy within a single bottle). Results: The products contained a mean of 21.38 (±11.16) mg CBD per gummy (range: 5.70 - 59.99 mg). In total, 70% of the gummies contained CBD in a concentration that differed by >10% of the dose listed on the packaging. In total, 39% of the products contained Δ9-THC and concentrations were highly variable (range: 0.019-0.88 mg Δ9-THC/gummy); 9 products (16% of products tested) contained >0.4 mg Δ9-THC per gummy. Within-product analysis (n = 10 products) revealed high variability across gummies (coefficient of variation for CBD: 2.1 - 27.1%; Δ9-THC: 3.1 - 23.5%). Conclusions: As several studies have demonstrated, unregulated CBD product packaging is not an accurate indication of the product constituents. This study further confirms that CBD products do not have reliable CBD concentrations-both relative to the dose listed on the label and among individual gummies within the same bottle. These products also frequently contain Δ9-THC (and occasionally Δ8-THC), often unbeknownst to the consumer. The results of this study support the growing body of literature suggesting the necessity of CBD product regulation to ensure customer health and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
164
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信