揭示数字:大型植物属染色体计数的知识现状。

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Rogelio Sánchez-Villegas, Inés Gómez-Ramos, Diana Cruz Tejada, Jacopo Franzoni, Marcial Escudero, Angelino Carta
{"title":"揭示数字:大型植物属染色体计数的知识现状。","authors":"Rogelio Sánchez-Villegas, Inés Gómez-Ramos, Diana Cruz Tejada, Jacopo Franzoni, Marcial Escudero, Angelino Carta","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcaf111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The plant nuclear genome is organized into discrete chromosomes, whose count is amongst the primary information for the description of an organism and our understanding of its differentiation and adaptation. Whilst species diversity is not evenly distributed across flowering plant genera, it is unknown whether the extraordinary taxonomic diversity exhibited by 86 big genera, collectively accounting for a quarter of all currently accepted angiosperm species, is supported by adequate chromosome number information.</p><p><strong>Scope: </strong>Leveraging data from the Chromosome Count Database (CCDB), we assessed current knowledge of chromosome counts in big plant genera. We do not have any assumption concerning the overall amount of chromosome data collectively available for these genera, but we expected that current knowledge is not complete and it has been shaped by main historical events influencing cytogenetics and comparative genomics during the last century. We also hypothesized that chromosome counts are limited for those genera exhibiting higher taxonomic uncertainty and geographical or biological features that hamper plant sampling and reproduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the proportion of species with at least one chromosome count is low (14%) with temporal trend revealing an unequivocal decline in counts acquisition after the 90s, coinciding with advances in DNA amplification and sequencing and molecular phylogenetics. In addition, logistic regressions confirmed our expectations that the proportion of species with chromosome count per genus is lower for genera with a tropical distribution, being primarily trees or exhibiting specialised pollination to complete sexual reproduction. Contrary to our expectations, taxonomic uncertainty is strongly positively associated with the availability of chromosome counts per genus. We argue that a higher taxonomic uncertainty has promoted more sampling to aid the circumscription of plant species, highlighting the crucial role of chromosome variation in identifying genomic traits that have supported the diversification of big plant genera.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling the numbers: current state of knowledge of chromosome number counts in big plant genera.\",\"authors\":\"Rogelio Sánchez-Villegas, Inés Gómez-Ramos, Diana Cruz Tejada, Jacopo Franzoni, Marcial Escudero, Angelino Carta\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aob/mcaf111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The plant nuclear genome is organized into discrete chromosomes, whose count is amongst the primary information for the description of an organism and our understanding of its differentiation and adaptation. Whilst species diversity is not evenly distributed across flowering plant genera, it is unknown whether the extraordinary taxonomic diversity exhibited by 86 big genera, collectively accounting for a quarter of all currently accepted angiosperm species, is supported by adequate chromosome number information.</p><p><strong>Scope: </strong>Leveraging data from the Chromosome Count Database (CCDB), we assessed current knowledge of chromosome counts in big plant genera. We do not have any assumption concerning the overall amount of chromosome data collectively available for these genera, but we expected that current knowledge is not complete and it has been shaped by main historical events influencing cytogenetics and comparative genomics during the last century. We also hypothesized that chromosome counts are limited for those genera exhibiting higher taxonomic uncertainty and geographical or biological features that hamper plant sampling and reproduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the proportion of species with at least one chromosome count is low (14%) with temporal trend revealing an unequivocal decline in counts acquisition after the 90s, coinciding with advances in DNA amplification and sequencing and molecular phylogenetics. In addition, logistic regressions confirmed our expectations that the proportion of species with chromosome count per genus is lower for genera with a tropical distribution, being primarily trees or exhibiting specialised pollination to complete sexual reproduction. Contrary to our expectations, taxonomic uncertainty is strongly positively associated with the availability of chromosome counts per genus. We argue that a higher taxonomic uncertainty has promoted more sampling to aid the circumscription of plant species, highlighting the crucial role of chromosome variation in identifying genomic traits that have supported the diversification of big plant genera.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of botany\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf111\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:植物核基因组被组织成离散的染色体,其数量是描述生物体和我们理解其分化和适应的主要信息之一。虽然物种多样性在开花植物属中分布不均,但86个大属所表现出的非凡的分类多样性是否有足够的染色体数目信息支持尚不清楚,这些大属占目前所有被子植物物种的四分之一。范围:利用染色体计数数据库(CCDB)的数据,我们评估了大型植物属染色体计数的当前知识。我们没有任何关于这些属的染色体数据总量的假设,但我们预计,目前的知识是不完整的,它是由上个世纪影响细胞遗传学和比较基因组学的主要历史事件形成的。我们还假设染色体计数对于那些表现出更高的分类不确定性和地理或生物学特征的属是有限的,这些特征阻碍了植物的采样和繁殖。结论:总体而言,至少有一条染色体计数的物种比例较低(14%),并且随着DNA扩增、测序和分子系统发育技术的进步,90年代后获得染色体计数的物种比例明显下降。此外,逻辑回归证实了我们的预期,即在热带分布的属中,每属染色体数的物种比例较低,主要是树木或表现出专门的授粉来完成有性生殖。与我们的预期相反,分类学的不确定性与每属染色体计数的可用性强烈正相关。我们认为,更高的分类不确定性促进了更多的采样来帮助植物物种的界定,强调了染色体变异在鉴定基因组性状方面的关键作用,这些性状支持了大型植物属的多样化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unveiling the numbers: current state of knowledge of chromosome number counts in big plant genera.

Background: The plant nuclear genome is organized into discrete chromosomes, whose count is amongst the primary information for the description of an organism and our understanding of its differentiation and adaptation. Whilst species diversity is not evenly distributed across flowering plant genera, it is unknown whether the extraordinary taxonomic diversity exhibited by 86 big genera, collectively accounting for a quarter of all currently accepted angiosperm species, is supported by adequate chromosome number information.

Scope: Leveraging data from the Chromosome Count Database (CCDB), we assessed current knowledge of chromosome counts in big plant genera. We do not have any assumption concerning the overall amount of chromosome data collectively available for these genera, but we expected that current knowledge is not complete and it has been shaped by main historical events influencing cytogenetics and comparative genomics during the last century. We also hypothesized that chromosome counts are limited for those genera exhibiting higher taxonomic uncertainty and geographical or biological features that hamper plant sampling and reproduction.

Conclusions: Overall, the proportion of species with at least one chromosome count is low (14%) with temporal trend revealing an unequivocal decline in counts acquisition after the 90s, coinciding with advances in DNA amplification and sequencing and molecular phylogenetics. In addition, logistic regressions confirmed our expectations that the proportion of species with chromosome count per genus is lower for genera with a tropical distribution, being primarily trees or exhibiting specialised pollination to complete sexual reproduction. Contrary to our expectations, taxonomic uncertainty is strongly positively associated with the availability of chromosome counts per genus. We argue that a higher taxonomic uncertainty has promoted more sampling to aid the circumscription of plant species, highlighting the crucial role of chromosome variation in identifying genomic traits that have supported the diversification of big plant genera.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信