Claire Wainwright, Susanna A McColley, Paul McNally, Michael Powers, Felix Ratjen, Jonathan H Rayment, George Retsch-Bogart, Erica Roesch, Bonnie Ramsey, Edward F McKone, Elizabeth Tullis, Marcus A Mall, Jennifer L Taylor-Cousar, David Waltz, Neil Ahluwalia, Chenghao Chu, Christina V Scirica, Jane C Davies
{"title":"elexaftor /Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor治疗≥6岁囊性纤维化且至少有一个F508del等位基因的儿童的长期安全性和有效性:一项为期192周的3期开放标签扩展研究","authors":"Claire Wainwright, Susanna A McColley, Paul McNally, Michael Powers, Felix Ratjen, Jonathan H Rayment, George Retsch-Bogart, Erica Roesch, Bonnie Ramsey, Edward F McKone, Elizabeth Tullis, Marcus A Mall, Jennifer L Taylor-Cousar, David Waltz, Neil Ahluwalia, Chenghao Chu, Christina V Scirica, Jane C Davies","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202502-0512OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Elexacaftor (ELX)/tezacaftor (TEZ)/ivacaftor (IVA) was shown to be safe and efficacious in children 6 through 11 years of age with cystic fibrosis (CF) and at least one <i>F508del</i> allele in a 24-week phase 3 study. Children completing this study could enroll into a 192-week extension study. <b>Objectives:</b> To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of ELX/TEZ/IVA in children ≥6 years of age. <b>Methods:</b> In this two-part (part A [96 wk] and part B [96 wk]) phase 3 extension study, children <12 years of age weighing <30 kg received ELX 100 mg once daily/TEZ 50 mg once daily/IVA 75 mg every 12 hours, and children weighing ≥30 kg or aged ≥12 years received ELX 200 mg once daily/TEZ 100 mg once daily/IVA 150 mg every 12 hours. <b>Measurements and Main Results:</b> Sixty-four children (<i>F508del</i>/minimal function [<i>n</i> = 36] and <i>F508del</i>/<i>F508del</i> [<i>n</i> = 28]) received at least one dose of ELX/TEZ/IVA. Mean exposure was 156.2 weeks, and 60.9% of children (<i>n</i> = 39) completed treatment in both parts of this 192-week study. The primary endpoint was safety. All children had adverse events, which for most were mild (31.3%) or moderate (64.1%) and generally consistent with common manifestations of CF. Two children (3.1%) had nonserious adverse events that led to treatment discontinuation (increased alanine aminotransferase [<i>n</i> = 1] and aggression [<i>n</i> = 1]). Secondary endpoints focused on efficacy. From parent study baseline, improvements were seen in percentage predicted FEV<sub>1</sub> (9.6 percentage points [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.4 to 13.7 percentage points]), sweat chloride concentration (-57.9 mmol/L [95% CI, -63.3 to -52.5 mmol/L]), Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised respiratory domain score (10.0 points [95% CI, 6.9 to 13.0 points]), lung clearance index at a 2.5% stopping point (-2.33 [95% CI, -2.87 to -1.79]), and body mass index <i>z</i>-score (0.39 [95% CI, 0.19 to 0.59]) at Week 192. The rate of pulmonary exacerbations per year was 0.05. The annualized rates of change in percentage predicted FEV<sub>1</sub> and lung clearance index at a 2.5% stopping point were -0.09 percentage points (95% CI, -1.01 to 0.84 percentage points) and -0.07 units (95% CI, -0.12 to -0.01 units), respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this 4-year extension study in children ≥6 years of age, the longest clinical trial experience with a CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) modulator in this pediatric population, ELX/TEZ/IVA remained generally safe and well tolerated, with no new safety findings. Clinically meaningful improvements in lung function, CFTR function, and nutritional status reported in the parent study were maintained. These results confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of ELX/TEZ/IVA in children ≥6 years of age.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04183790).</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1915-1925"},"PeriodicalIF":19.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Children ≥6 Years with Cystic Fibrosis and at Least One <i>F508del</i> Allele: A 192-Week, Phase 3, Open-Label Extension Study.\",\"authors\":\"Claire Wainwright, Susanna A McColley, Paul McNally, Michael Powers, Felix Ratjen, Jonathan H Rayment, George Retsch-Bogart, Erica Roesch, Bonnie Ramsey, Edward F McKone, Elizabeth Tullis, Marcus A Mall, Jennifer L Taylor-Cousar, David Waltz, Neil Ahluwalia, Chenghao Chu, Christina V Scirica, Jane C Davies\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/rccm.202502-0512OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Elexacaftor (ELX)/tezacaftor (TEZ)/ivacaftor (IVA) was shown to be safe and efficacious in children 6 through 11 years of age with cystic fibrosis (CF) and at least one <i>F508del</i> allele in a 24-week phase 3 study. Children completing this study could enroll into a 192-week extension study. <b>Objectives:</b> To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of ELX/TEZ/IVA in children ≥6 years of age. <b>Methods:</b> In this two-part (part A [96 wk] and part B [96 wk]) phase 3 extension study, children <12 years of age weighing <30 kg received ELX 100 mg once daily/TEZ 50 mg once daily/IVA 75 mg every 12 hours, and children weighing ≥30 kg or aged ≥12 years received ELX 200 mg once daily/TEZ 100 mg once daily/IVA 150 mg every 12 hours. <b>Measurements and Main Results:</b> Sixty-four children (<i>F508del</i>/minimal function [<i>n</i> = 36] and <i>F508del</i>/<i>F508del</i> [<i>n</i> = 28]) received at least one dose of ELX/TEZ/IVA. Mean exposure was 156.2 weeks, and 60.9% of children (<i>n</i> = 39) completed treatment in both parts of this 192-week study. The primary endpoint was safety. All children had adverse events, which for most were mild (31.3%) or moderate (64.1%) and generally consistent with common manifestations of CF. Two children (3.1%) had nonserious adverse events that led to treatment discontinuation (increased alanine aminotransferase [<i>n</i> = 1] and aggression [<i>n</i> = 1]). Secondary endpoints focused on efficacy. From parent study baseline, improvements were seen in percentage predicted FEV<sub>1</sub> (9.6 percentage points [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.4 to 13.7 percentage points]), sweat chloride concentration (-57.9 mmol/L [95% CI, -63.3 to -52.5 mmol/L]), Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised respiratory domain score (10.0 points [95% CI, 6.9 to 13.0 points]), lung clearance index at a 2.5% stopping point (-2.33 [95% CI, -2.87 to -1.79]), and body mass index <i>z</i>-score (0.39 [95% CI, 0.19 to 0.59]) at Week 192. The rate of pulmonary exacerbations per year was 0.05. The annualized rates of change in percentage predicted FEV<sub>1</sub> and lung clearance index at a 2.5% stopping point were -0.09 percentage points (95% CI, -1.01 to 0.84 percentage points) and -0.07 units (95% CI, -0.12 to -0.01 units), respectively. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this 4-year extension study in children ≥6 years of age, the longest clinical trial experience with a CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) modulator in this pediatric population, ELX/TEZ/IVA remained generally safe and well tolerated, with no new safety findings. Clinically meaningful improvements in lung function, CFTR function, and nutritional status reported in the parent study were maintained. These results confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of ELX/TEZ/IVA in children ≥6 years of age.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04183790).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1915-1925\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202502-0512OC\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202502-0512OC","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Children ≥6 Years with Cystic Fibrosis and at Least One F508del Allele: A 192-Week, Phase 3, Open-Label Extension Study.
Rationale: Elexacaftor (ELX)/tezacaftor (TEZ)/ivacaftor (IVA) was shown to be safe and efficacious in children 6 through 11 years of age with cystic fibrosis (CF) and at least one F508del allele in a 24-week phase 3 study. Children completing this study could enroll into a 192-week extension study. Objectives: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of ELX/TEZ/IVA in children ≥6 years of age. Methods: In this two-part (part A [96 wk] and part B [96 wk]) phase 3 extension study, children <12 years of age weighing <30 kg received ELX 100 mg once daily/TEZ 50 mg once daily/IVA 75 mg every 12 hours, and children weighing ≥30 kg or aged ≥12 years received ELX 200 mg once daily/TEZ 100 mg once daily/IVA 150 mg every 12 hours. Measurements and Main Results: Sixty-four children (F508del/minimal function [n = 36] and F508del/F508del [n = 28]) received at least one dose of ELX/TEZ/IVA. Mean exposure was 156.2 weeks, and 60.9% of children (n = 39) completed treatment in both parts of this 192-week study. The primary endpoint was safety. All children had adverse events, which for most were mild (31.3%) or moderate (64.1%) and generally consistent with common manifestations of CF. Two children (3.1%) had nonserious adverse events that led to treatment discontinuation (increased alanine aminotransferase [n = 1] and aggression [n = 1]). Secondary endpoints focused on efficacy. From parent study baseline, improvements were seen in percentage predicted FEV1 (9.6 percentage points [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.4 to 13.7 percentage points]), sweat chloride concentration (-57.9 mmol/L [95% CI, -63.3 to -52.5 mmol/L]), Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised respiratory domain score (10.0 points [95% CI, 6.9 to 13.0 points]), lung clearance index at a 2.5% stopping point (-2.33 [95% CI, -2.87 to -1.79]), and body mass index z-score (0.39 [95% CI, 0.19 to 0.59]) at Week 192. The rate of pulmonary exacerbations per year was 0.05. The annualized rates of change in percentage predicted FEV1 and lung clearance index at a 2.5% stopping point were -0.09 percentage points (95% CI, -1.01 to 0.84 percentage points) and -0.07 units (95% CI, -0.12 to -0.01 units), respectively. Conclusions: In this 4-year extension study in children ≥6 years of age, the longest clinical trial experience with a CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) modulator in this pediatric population, ELX/TEZ/IVA remained generally safe and well tolerated, with no new safety findings. Clinically meaningful improvements in lung function, CFTR function, and nutritional status reported in the parent study were maintained. These results confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of ELX/TEZ/IVA in children ≥6 years of age.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04183790).
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences.
A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.