Iris Sammarco, Eliška Krtilová, Marek Slovák, Clément Lafon Placette
{"title":"植物界性别变化的可逆性:比我们想象的更重要?","authors":"Iris Sammarco, Eliška Krtilová, Marek Slovák, Clément Lafon Placette","doi":"10.1111/brv.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Compared to animals, plants show a wide range of reproductive strategies with different degrees of sex separation (e.g. dioecy, monoecy, hermaphroditism). While sex expression was previously thought to be genetically determined and fixed in plants, accumulating evidence suggests that sex expression can change reversibly even within one generation (sex changes), involving non-genetic factors (i.e. environment and epigenetics). In addition, recent work suggests that sex determination itself relies on epigenetic factors. Therefore, in this review, we propose that the border between sex changes and the apparently \"fixed\" determination of sexes is less clear than previously thought, as they rely on similar mechanisms, in particular epigenetics. Specifically, we propose that within-generation sex changes may facilitate evolutionary transitions between different degrees of sex separation via the assimilation of epimutations into genetic mutations. We then evaluate the (mal)adaptive potential of sex changes. We conclude that in the face of global environmental changes, sex changes may follow a bet-hedging evolutionary strategy, that is a heritable ability to reverse sexes. Sexual bet-hedging with an epigenetic basis (via stochastic epimutations) may help plants alleviate the deleterious consequences of climate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reversibility of sex changes in the plant kingdom: more important than we thought?\",\"authors\":\"Iris Sammarco, Eliška Krtilová, Marek Slovák, Clément Lafon Placette\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/brv.70043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Compared to animals, plants show a wide range of reproductive strategies with different degrees of sex separation (e.g. dioecy, monoecy, hermaphroditism). While sex expression was previously thought to be genetically determined and fixed in plants, accumulating evidence suggests that sex expression can change reversibly even within one generation (sex changes), involving non-genetic factors (i.e. environment and epigenetics). In addition, recent work suggests that sex determination itself relies on epigenetic factors. Therefore, in this review, we propose that the border between sex changes and the apparently \\\"fixed\\\" determination of sexes is less clear than previously thought, as they rely on similar mechanisms, in particular epigenetics. Specifically, we propose that within-generation sex changes may facilitate evolutionary transitions between different degrees of sex separation via the assimilation of epimutations into genetic mutations. We then evaluate the (mal)adaptive potential of sex changes. We conclude that in the face of global environmental changes, sex changes may follow a bet-hedging evolutionary strategy, that is a heritable ability to reverse sexes. Sexual bet-hedging with an epigenetic basis (via stochastic epimutations) may help plants alleviate the deleterious consequences of climate change.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70043\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70043","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reversibility of sex changes in the plant kingdom: more important than we thought?
Compared to animals, plants show a wide range of reproductive strategies with different degrees of sex separation (e.g. dioecy, monoecy, hermaphroditism). While sex expression was previously thought to be genetically determined and fixed in plants, accumulating evidence suggests that sex expression can change reversibly even within one generation (sex changes), involving non-genetic factors (i.e. environment and epigenetics). In addition, recent work suggests that sex determination itself relies on epigenetic factors. Therefore, in this review, we propose that the border between sex changes and the apparently "fixed" determination of sexes is less clear than previously thought, as they rely on similar mechanisms, in particular epigenetics. Specifically, we propose that within-generation sex changes may facilitate evolutionary transitions between different degrees of sex separation via the assimilation of epimutations into genetic mutations. We then evaluate the (mal)adaptive potential of sex changes. We conclude that in the face of global environmental changes, sex changes may follow a bet-hedging evolutionary strategy, that is a heritable ability to reverse sexes. Sexual bet-hedging with an epigenetic basis (via stochastic epimutations) may help plants alleviate the deleterious consequences of climate change.
期刊介绍:
Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly.
The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions.
The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field.
Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.