不同资本主义制度下的政治经济周期

IF 1.4 4区经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS

Economics & Politics Pub Date : 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1111/ecpo.12331

Joscha Beckmann, Rainer Schweickert, Marvin Jahn

{"title":"不同资本主义制度下的政治经济周期","authors":"Joscha Beckmann, Rainer Schweickert, Marvin Jahn","doi":"10.1111/ecpo.12331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study contributes to the literature on political business cycles by assessing the effect of elections on growth expectations based on expert survey data instead of using actual performance data. We analyze the different roles opportunistic and partisan politics play in varieties of capitalistic systems as a source of heterogeneity. Our results show that expectations differ remarkably between Liberal and Coordinated Market Economies (LME vs. CME) even independent of election outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47220,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Politics","volume":"37 2","pages":"653-668"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecpo.12331","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Business Cycles in Varieties of Capitalistic Systems\",\"authors\":\"Joscha Beckmann, Rainer Schweickert, Marvin Jahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecpo.12331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study contributes to the literature on political business cycles by assessing the effect of elections on growth expectations based on expert survey data instead of using actual performance data. We analyze the different roles opportunistic and partisan politics play in varieties of capitalistic systems as a source of heterogeneity. Our results show that expectations differ remarkably between Liberal and Coordinated Market Economies (LME vs. CME) even independent of election outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics & Politics\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"653-668\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecpo.12331\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics & Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecpo.12331\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecpo.12331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过评估选举对增长预期的影响，而不是使用实际表现数据，为政治经济周期的文献做出了贡献。我们分析了机会主义和党派政治在各种资本主义制度中作为异质性来源所扮演的不同角色。我们的研究结果表明，即使独立于选举结果，自由市场经济和协调市场经济（LME vs. CME）之间的预期也存在显著差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Political Business Cycles in Varieties of Capitalistic Systems

查看原文本刊更多论文

Political Business Cycles in Varieties of Capitalistic Systems

This study contributes to the literature on political business cycles by assessing the effect of elections on growth expectations based on expert survey data instead of using actual performance data. We analyze the different roles opportunistic and partisan politics play in varieties of capitalistic systems as a source of heterogeneity. Our results show that expectations differ remarkably between Liberal and Coordinated Market Economies (LME vs. CME) even independent of election outcomes.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Economics & Politics Multiple-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Economics & Politics focuses on analytical political economy, broadly defined as the study of economic and political phenomena and policy in models that include political processes, institutions and markets. The journal is the source for innovative theoretical and empirical work on the intersection of politics and economics, at both domestic and international levels, and aims to promote new approaches on how these forces interact to affect political outcomes and policy choices, economic performance and societal welfare. Economics & Politics is a vital source of information for economists, academics and students, providing: - Analytical political economics - International scholarship - Accessible & thought-provoking articles - Creative inter-disciplinary analysis