一种快速准确估算土壤有机质温度敏感性的方法

IF 3.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Clément Bonnefoy-Claudet, Mathieu Thevenot, Jean Lévêque, Olivier Mathieu
{"title":"一种快速准确估算土壤有机质温度敏感性的方法","authors":"Clément Bonnefoy-Claudet,&nbsp;Mathieu Thevenot,&nbsp;Jean Lévêque,&nbsp;Olivier Mathieu","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The carbon flux from soil organic matter degradation is significant and could increase with climate change, with a potential retroactive effect. The change in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from soils due to temperature variations can be estimated using the Q<sub>10</sub> parameter, which measures how sensitive the rates of chemical reactions or biological processes are to temperature changes. This is a key parameter for estimating the effects of climate change on soil carbon fluxes and is used in many global carbon models, often as fixed values, although it appears to vary widely among ecosystems. Data currently available in the literature are difficult to compare, as they are based on different approaches and analytical protocols. In this study, the two most commonly used laboratory methods, equal-time and sequential, were compared using a respiration measurement system (respirometer). The results, based on different soils, are in agreement with the literature. The equal-time method provides better exponential adjustments for calculating Q<sub>10</sub> values. This approach also minimises potential biases caused by a reduction of available nutrients and/or changes in microbial community structure during the measurement period. For future studies of temperature sensitivity, we recommend the use of the equal-time method with a pre-incubation period, a high measurement frequency, and an incubation time not exceeding 24 h per temperature and sample. This work is based on an automated multi-position respirometer and can be adapted to any other CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring instruments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70130","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Rapid and Accurate Method for Estimating the Temperature Sensitivity of Soil Organic Matter (Q10)\",\"authors\":\"Clément Bonnefoy-Claudet,&nbsp;Mathieu Thevenot,&nbsp;Jean Lévêque,&nbsp;Olivier Mathieu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejss.70130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The carbon flux from soil organic matter degradation is significant and could increase with climate change, with a potential retroactive effect. The change in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from soils due to temperature variations can be estimated using the Q<sub>10</sub> parameter, which measures how sensitive the rates of chemical reactions or biological processes are to temperature changes. This is a key parameter for estimating the effects of climate change on soil carbon fluxes and is used in many global carbon models, often as fixed values, although it appears to vary widely among ecosystems. Data currently available in the literature are difficult to compare, as they are based on different approaches and analytical protocols. In this study, the two most commonly used laboratory methods, equal-time and sequential, were compared using a respiration measurement system (respirometer). The results, based on different soils, are in agreement with the literature. The equal-time method provides better exponential adjustments for calculating Q<sub>10</sub> values. This approach also minimises potential biases caused by a reduction of available nutrients and/or changes in microbial community structure during the measurement period. For future studies of temperature sensitivity, we recommend the use of the equal-time method with a pre-incubation period, a high measurement frequency, and an incubation time not exceeding 24 h per temperature and sample. This work is based on an automated multi-position respirometer and can be adapted to any other CO<sub>2</sub> monitoring instruments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"76 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70130\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70130\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤有机质降解产生的碳通量显著,并可能随着气候变化而增加,具有潜在的追溯效应。由于温度变化,土壤中二氧化碳排放量的变化可以使用Q10参数来估计,Q10参数测量化学反应或生物过程的速率对温度变化的敏感程度。这是估算气候变化对土壤碳通量影响的一个关键参数,在许多全球碳模型中使用,通常作为固定值,尽管它在不同的生态系统中似乎差别很大。目前文献中可用的数据很难比较,因为它们基于不同的方法和分析协议。在本研究中,使用呼吸测量系统(呼吸计)比较了两种最常用的实验室方法,即等时间法和顺序法。基于不同土壤的结果与文献一致。等时间方法为计算Q10值提供了更好的指数调整。这种方法还可以最大限度地减少测量期间可用营养物质减少和/或微生物群落结构变化造成的潜在偏差。对于未来的温度敏感性研究,我们建议使用等时间方法,预孵育时间,高测量频率,每个温度和样品的孵育时间不超过24小时。这项工作是基于一个自动化的多位置呼吸计,可以适应任何其他二氧化碳监测仪器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Rapid and Accurate Method for Estimating the Temperature Sensitivity of Soil Organic Matter (Q10)

A Rapid and Accurate Method for Estimating the Temperature Sensitivity of Soil Organic Matter (Q10)

The carbon flux from soil organic matter degradation is significant and could increase with climate change, with a potential retroactive effect. The change in CO2 emissions from soils due to temperature variations can be estimated using the Q10 parameter, which measures how sensitive the rates of chemical reactions or biological processes are to temperature changes. This is a key parameter for estimating the effects of climate change on soil carbon fluxes and is used in many global carbon models, often as fixed values, although it appears to vary widely among ecosystems. Data currently available in the literature are difficult to compare, as they are based on different approaches and analytical protocols. In this study, the two most commonly used laboratory methods, equal-time and sequential, were compared using a respiration measurement system (respirometer). The results, based on different soils, are in agreement with the literature. The equal-time method provides better exponential adjustments for calculating Q10 values. This approach also minimises potential biases caused by a reduction of available nutrients and/or changes in microbial community structure during the measurement period. For future studies of temperature sensitivity, we recommend the use of the equal-time method with a pre-incubation period, a high measurement frequency, and an incubation time not exceeding 24 h per temperature and sample. This work is based on an automated multi-position respirometer and can be adapted to any other CO2 monitoring instruments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信