北方干旱泥炭地连续覆盖林分挪威云杉对选择性采收的生长响应

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Samuli Helama , Juha Heikkinen , Aleksi Lehtonen , Raisa Mäkipää
{"title":"北方干旱泥炭地连续覆盖林分挪威云杉对选择性采收的生长响应","authors":"Samuli Helama ,&nbsp;Juha Heikkinen ,&nbsp;Aleksi Lehtonen ,&nbsp;Raisa Mäkipää","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Continuous cover forestry (CCF) has less environmental impacts than rotation forestry, but knowledge on growth responses of different tree cohorts to selection harvesting is scarce. In this study, tree-ring data of dominant and suppressed Norway spruce (<em>Picea abies</em> (L.) H.Karst.) trees representing CCF-managed drained peatland stands from north to south boreal forests were analysed with respect to selection harvest to basal area of 12–13 m<sup>2</sup>/ha using generalized additive mixed models (GAMM). The first statistically significant impacts were seen in suppressed trees one year after thinning. In four out of five sites, the suppressed trees displayed significant impacts one year earlier than the dominant trees. In three sites, the post-thinning ring-widths of the suppressed trees were up to three to four times the predicted widths, three or four years after thinning, while dominant trees showed a 50–100 % increase. However, the growth response of the basal area increment of suppressed trees was smaller, since the suppressed trees were on average smaller than the dominant trees. Thus, the lower growth after selection cutting previously observed at stand-level studies of CCF is likely due to the removal of a large proportion of large productive trees, rather than a small or delayed response of suppressed trees. It seems that the elevated water table in the harvested plots through decreased evapotranspiration did not limit the post-harvest growth release in the case of the selection harvest experiment of the present study. If the elevated water table had any effect on the growth release, this mechanism was probably less counterproductive for suppressed trees which also benefitted from improved light conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"593 ","pages":"Article 122816"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growth response of Norway spruce trees to selection harvest in continuous cover forestry stands on drained boreal peatlands\",\"authors\":\"Samuli Helama ,&nbsp;Juha Heikkinen ,&nbsp;Aleksi Lehtonen ,&nbsp;Raisa Mäkipää\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Continuous cover forestry (CCF) has less environmental impacts than rotation forestry, but knowledge on growth responses of different tree cohorts to selection harvesting is scarce. In this study, tree-ring data of dominant and suppressed Norway spruce (<em>Picea abies</em> (L.) H.Karst.) trees representing CCF-managed drained peatland stands from north to south boreal forests were analysed with respect to selection harvest to basal area of 12–13 m<sup>2</sup>/ha using generalized additive mixed models (GAMM). The first statistically significant impacts were seen in suppressed trees one year after thinning. In four out of five sites, the suppressed trees displayed significant impacts one year earlier than the dominant trees. In three sites, the post-thinning ring-widths of the suppressed trees were up to three to four times the predicted widths, three or four years after thinning, while dominant trees showed a 50–100 % increase. However, the growth response of the basal area increment of suppressed trees was smaller, since the suppressed trees were on average smaller than the dominant trees. Thus, the lower growth after selection cutting previously observed at stand-level studies of CCF is likely due to the removal of a large proportion of large productive trees, rather than a small or delayed response of suppressed trees. It seems that the elevated water table in the harvested plots through decreased evapotranspiration did not limit the post-harvest growth release in the case of the selection harvest experiment of the present study. If the elevated water table had any effect on the growth release, this mechanism was probably less counterproductive for suppressed trees which also benefitted from improved light conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"volume\":\"593 \",\"pages\":\"Article 122816\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037811272500324X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037811272500324X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与轮作林相比,连续覆盖林对环境的影响较小,但对不同树种对选择性采伐的生长响应了解较少。本研究利用挪威云杉(Picea abies (L.)利用广义加性混合模型(GAMM)分析了代表ccf管理的从北到南的北方针叶林排水泥炭地林分的H.Karst.)树木在基础面积12-13 m2/ha的选择收获方面的情况。第一个统计上显著的影响出现在砍伐后一年的树木上。在5个站点中,有4个站点的受抑制树比优势树早1年表现出显著的影响。在3个样地,间伐后3 ~ 4年,抑制树的年轮宽度达到预测的3 ~ 4倍,而优势树的年轮宽度增加了50 ~ 100 %。然而,受抑制树的基面积增量的生长响应较小,因为受抑制树的平均面积小于优势树。因此,以前在林分水平的CCF研究中观察到的选择砍伐后的较低生长可能是由于大量高产树木被砍伐,而不是受抑制树木的小响应或延迟响应。在本研究的选择采收试验中,通过减少蒸散而提高采收地块的地下水位似乎并没有限制采收后的生长释放。如果升高的地下水位对生长释放有任何影响,那么这种机制可能对抑制树木的反生产效果较小,因为它们也受益于改善的光照条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Growth response of Norway spruce trees to selection harvest in continuous cover forestry stands on drained boreal peatlands
Continuous cover forestry (CCF) has less environmental impacts than rotation forestry, but knowledge on growth responses of different tree cohorts to selection harvesting is scarce. In this study, tree-ring data of dominant and suppressed Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H.Karst.) trees representing CCF-managed drained peatland stands from north to south boreal forests were analysed with respect to selection harvest to basal area of 12–13 m2/ha using generalized additive mixed models (GAMM). The first statistically significant impacts were seen in suppressed trees one year after thinning. In four out of five sites, the suppressed trees displayed significant impacts one year earlier than the dominant trees. In three sites, the post-thinning ring-widths of the suppressed trees were up to three to four times the predicted widths, three or four years after thinning, while dominant trees showed a 50–100 % increase. However, the growth response of the basal area increment of suppressed trees was smaller, since the suppressed trees were on average smaller than the dominant trees. Thus, the lower growth after selection cutting previously observed at stand-level studies of CCF is likely due to the removal of a large proportion of large productive trees, rather than a small or delayed response of suppressed trees. It seems that the elevated water table in the harvested plots through decreased evapotranspiration did not limit the post-harvest growth release in the case of the selection harvest experiment of the present study. If the elevated water table had any effect on the growth release, this mechanism was probably less counterproductive for suppressed trees which also benefitted from improved light conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信