{"title":"北方干旱泥炭地连续覆盖林分挪威云杉对选择性采收的生长响应","authors":"Samuli Helama , Juha Heikkinen , Aleksi Lehtonen , Raisa Mäkipää","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Continuous cover forestry (CCF) has less environmental impacts than rotation forestry, but knowledge on growth responses of different tree cohorts to selection harvesting is scarce. In this study, tree-ring data of dominant and suppressed Norway spruce (<em>Picea abies</em> (L.) H.Karst.) trees representing CCF-managed drained peatland stands from north to south boreal forests were analysed with respect to selection harvest to basal area of 12–13 m<sup>2</sup>/ha using generalized additive mixed models (GAMM). The first statistically significant impacts were seen in suppressed trees one year after thinning. In four out of five sites, the suppressed trees displayed significant impacts one year earlier than the dominant trees. In three sites, the post-thinning ring-widths of the suppressed trees were up to three to four times the predicted widths, three or four years after thinning, while dominant trees showed a 50–100 % increase. However, the growth response of the basal area increment of suppressed trees was smaller, since the suppressed trees were on average smaller than the dominant trees. Thus, the lower growth after selection cutting previously observed at stand-level studies of CCF is likely due to the removal of a large proportion of large productive trees, rather than a small or delayed response of suppressed trees. It seems that the elevated water table in the harvested plots through decreased evapotranspiration did not limit the post-harvest growth release in the case of the selection harvest experiment of the present study. If the elevated water table had any effect on the growth release, this mechanism was probably less counterproductive for suppressed trees which also benefitted from improved light conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"593 ","pages":"Article 122816"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growth response of Norway spruce trees to selection harvest in continuous cover forestry stands on drained boreal peatlands\",\"authors\":\"Samuli Helama , Juha Heikkinen , Aleksi Lehtonen , Raisa Mäkipää\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Continuous cover forestry (CCF) has less environmental impacts than rotation forestry, but knowledge on growth responses of different tree cohorts to selection harvesting is scarce. In this study, tree-ring data of dominant and suppressed Norway spruce (<em>Picea abies</em> (L.) H.Karst.) trees representing CCF-managed drained peatland stands from north to south boreal forests were analysed with respect to selection harvest to basal area of 12–13 m<sup>2</sup>/ha using generalized additive mixed models (GAMM). The first statistically significant impacts were seen in suppressed trees one year after thinning. In four out of five sites, the suppressed trees displayed significant impacts one year earlier than the dominant trees. In three sites, the post-thinning ring-widths of the suppressed trees were up to three to four times the predicted widths, three or four years after thinning, while dominant trees showed a 50–100 % increase. However, the growth response of the basal area increment of suppressed trees was smaller, since the suppressed trees were on average smaller than the dominant trees. Thus, the lower growth after selection cutting previously observed at stand-level studies of CCF is likely due to the removal of a large proportion of large productive trees, rather than a small or delayed response of suppressed trees. It seems that the elevated water table in the harvested plots through decreased evapotranspiration did not limit the post-harvest growth release in the case of the selection harvest experiment of the present study. If the elevated water table had any effect on the growth release, this mechanism was probably less counterproductive for suppressed trees which also benefitted from improved light conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"volume\":\"593 \",\"pages\":\"Article 122816\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037811272500324X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037811272500324X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Growth response of Norway spruce trees to selection harvest in continuous cover forestry stands on drained boreal peatlands
Continuous cover forestry (CCF) has less environmental impacts than rotation forestry, but knowledge on growth responses of different tree cohorts to selection harvesting is scarce. In this study, tree-ring data of dominant and suppressed Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H.Karst.) trees representing CCF-managed drained peatland stands from north to south boreal forests were analysed with respect to selection harvest to basal area of 12–13 m2/ha using generalized additive mixed models (GAMM). The first statistically significant impacts were seen in suppressed trees one year after thinning. In four out of five sites, the suppressed trees displayed significant impacts one year earlier than the dominant trees. In three sites, the post-thinning ring-widths of the suppressed trees were up to three to four times the predicted widths, three or four years after thinning, while dominant trees showed a 50–100 % increase. However, the growth response of the basal area increment of suppressed trees was smaller, since the suppressed trees were on average smaller than the dominant trees. Thus, the lower growth after selection cutting previously observed at stand-level studies of CCF is likely due to the removal of a large proportion of large productive trees, rather than a small or delayed response of suppressed trees. It seems that the elevated water table in the harvested plots through decreased evapotranspiration did not limit the post-harvest growth release in the case of the selection harvest experiment of the present study. If the elevated water table had any effect on the growth release, this mechanism was probably less counterproductive for suppressed trees which also benefitted from improved light conditions.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.