对蓄意生物安全威胁研究的科学计量学分析揭示了北大西洋的主导地位

Q1 Social Sciences
Suryesh Kumar Namdeo, Chandan GN
{"title":"对蓄意生物安全威胁研究的科学计量学分析揭示了北大西洋的主导地位","authors":"Suryesh Kumar Namdeo,&nbsp;Chandan GN","doi":"10.1016/j.jobb.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Academic research is crucial to understanding and preparing for the fight against deliberate biological threats; yet, existing efforts have been fragmented, necessitating a more comprehensive examination of the field’s evolution. This study presents a scientometric analysis of deliberate biosecurity threats over the last 20 years, focusing on publication patterns, collaboration dynamics, research priorities, and leading publication venues. We analyzed 791 articles published between 2004 and 2023 using the Web of Science and Scopus databases. Results indicate a notable increase in publications dominated by North-Transatlantic countries, particularly the United States and the United Kingdom, which prioritize such areas as dual-use technology, synthetic biology, and virus-related biosecurity challenges. A comparative analysis of G7 and BRICS collaborations underscores substantial disparities in research output, with the G7 leading in international biosecurity research collaborations. Furthermore, the study reveals limited biosecurity research and collaboration in the Global South. Therefore, we encourage further exploration of biosecurity research to promote inclusive and collaborative global efforts. This study provides valuable insights for researchers and policymakers regarding biosecurity research priorities related to deliberate threats, and it highlights the need to address global disparities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity","volume":"7 2","pages":"Pages 69-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scientometric analysis of research on deliberate biosecurity threats reveals North-Transatlantic dominance\",\"authors\":\"Suryesh Kumar Namdeo,&nbsp;Chandan GN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jobb.2025.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Academic research is crucial to understanding and preparing for the fight against deliberate biological threats; yet, existing efforts have been fragmented, necessitating a more comprehensive examination of the field’s evolution. This study presents a scientometric analysis of deliberate biosecurity threats over the last 20 years, focusing on publication patterns, collaboration dynamics, research priorities, and leading publication venues. We analyzed 791 articles published between 2004 and 2023 using the Web of Science and Scopus databases. Results indicate a notable increase in publications dominated by North-Transatlantic countries, particularly the United States and the United Kingdom, which prioritize such areas as dual-use technology, synthetic biology, and virus-related biosecurity challenges. A comparative analysis of G7 and BRICS collaborations underscores substantial disparities in research output, with the G7 leading in international biosecurity research collaborations. Furthermore, the study reveals limited biosecurity research and collaboration in the Global South. Therefore, we encourage further exploration of biosecurity research to promote inclusive and collaborative global efforts. This study provides valuable insights for researchers and policymakers regarding biosecurity research priorities related to deliberate threats, and it highlights the need to address global disparities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 69-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1093\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588933825000135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588933825000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学术研究对于理解和准备打击蓄意的生物威胁至关重要;然而,现有的努力是分散的,需要对该领域的演变进行更全面的审查。本研究对过去20年蓄意的生物安全威胁进行了科学计量分析,重点关注出版模式、合作动态、研究重点和主要出版场所。我们使用Web of Science和Scopus数据库分析了2004年至2023年间发表的791篇文章。结果表明,以北大西洋国家,特别是美国和联合王国为主导的出版物显著增加,这些国家优先考虑军民两用技术、合成生物学和与病毒有关的生物安全挑战等领域。对七国集团和金砖国家合作的比较分析表明,七国集团在国际生物安全研究合作方面处于领先地位,在研究产出方面存在巨大差距。此外,该研究还揭示了发展中国家在生物安全方面的研究和合作有限。因此,我们鼓励进一步探索生物安全研究,以促进包容和合作的全球努力。这项研究为研究人员和政策制定者提供了有关蓄意威胁的生物安全研究重点的宝贵见解,并强调了解决全球差异的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scientometric analysis of research on deliberate biosecurity threats reveals North-Transatlantic dominance
Academic research is crucial to understanding and preparing for the fight against deliberate biological threats; yet, existing efforts have been fragmented, necessitating a more comprehensive examination of the field’s evolution. This study presents a scientometric analysis of deliberate biosecurity threats over the last 20 years, focusing on publication patterns, collaboration dynamics, research priorities, and leading publication venues. We analyzed 791 articles published between 2004 and 2023 using the Web of Science and Scopus databases. Results indicate a notable increase in publications dominated by North-Transatlantic countries, particularly the United States and the United Kingdom, which prioritize such areas as dual-use technology, synthetic biology, and virus-related biosecurity challenges. A comparative analysis of G7 and BRICS collaborations underscores substantial disparities in research output, with the G7 leading in international biosecurity research collaborations. Furthermore, the study reveals limited biosecurity research and collaboration in the Global South. Therefore, we encourage further exploration of biosecurity research to promote inclusive and collaborative global efforts. This study provides valuable insights for researchers and policymakers regarding biosecurity research priorities related to deliberate threats, and it highlights the need to address global disparities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity
Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
41 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信