我们的选择是什么?意大利上空卫星和再分析降水数据集的评估

IF 5 2区 地球科学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Benedetta Moccia , Luca Buonora , Claudia Bertini , Elena Ridolfi , Fabio Russo , Francesco Napolitano
{"title":"我们的选择是什么?意大利上空卫星和再分析降水数据集的评估","authors":"Benedetta Moccia ,&nbsp;Luca Buonora ,&nbsp;Claudia Bertini ,&nbsp;Elena Ridolfi ,&nbsp;Fabio Russo ,&nbsp;Francesco Napolitano","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Region</h3><div>Italy.</div></div><div><h3>Study Focus</h3><div>Gridded precipitation datasets, satellite and reanalysis based, offer the potential to provide precipitation estimates with quasi-global coverage, extending to areas not accessible by ground-based instruments. Even though their quality has improved over time, their performances vary across the globe, since their accuracy is related to the orography and climate of the area under analysis. This variability together with the increasing availability of freely accessible gridded datasets often lead scholars and hydrologists to assess the suitability of precipitation products for specific analyses. In this paper, we address this issue by evaluating the performance of six widely used gridded precipitation products (CERRA-Land, ERA5-Land, CHIRPS, CMORPH, IMERG, PERSIANN-CCS-CDR) over Italy. We benchmark them against the national rain gauge network dataset (SCIA) by computing continuous and categorical performance metrics across different temporal scales (daily, monthly, yearly). Our findings are presented at various spatial scales <span><math><mo>−</mo></math></span> from watershed to Köppen-Geiger climate zones <span><math><mo>−</mo></math></span> to support future hydrological studies with diverse objectives.</div></div><div><h3>New Hydrological insights for the Region</h3><div>The two reanalysis datasets (i.e., ERA5-Land and CERRA-Land) are the best performing across Italy, closely followed by IMERG satellite-based product. CMORPH and PERSIANN-CCS-CDR resulted the least performing. Although all the gridded datasets considered showed to have difficulties in detecting precipitation over mountainous areas, they proved to be a valuable alternative to conventional rain gauge networks, especially at longer temporal scales.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 102487"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is our pick? Assessment of satellite and reanalysis precipitation datasets over Italy\",\"authors\":\"Benedetta Moccia ,&nbsp;Luca Buonora ,&nbsp;Claudia Bertini ,&nbsp;Elena Ridolfi ,&nbsp;Fabio Russo ,&nbsp;Francesco Napolitano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study Region</h3><div>Italy.</div></div><div><h3>Study Focus</h3><div>Gridded precipitation datasets, satellite and reanalysis based, offer the potential to provide precipitation estimates with quasi-global coverage, extending to areas not accessible by ground-based instruments. Even though their quality has improved over time, their performances vary across the globe, since their accuracy is related to the orography and climate of the area under analysis. This variability together with the increasing availability of freely accessible gridded datasets often lead scholars and hydrologists to assess the suitability of precipitation products for specific analyses. In this paper, we address this issue by evaluating the performance of six widely used gridded precipitation products (CERRA-Land, ERA5-Land, CHIRPS, CMORPH, IMERG, PERSIANN-CCS-CDR) over Italy. We benchmark them against the national rain gauge network dataset (SCIA) by computing continuous and categorical performance metrics across different temporal scales (daily, monthly, yearly). Our findings are presented at various spatial scales <span><math><mo>−</mo></math></span> from watershed to Köppen-Geiger climate zones <span><math><mo>−</mo></math></span> to support future hydrological studies with diverse objectives.</div></div><div><h3>New Hydrological insights for the Region</h3><div>The two reanalysis datasets (i.e., ERA5-Land and CERRA-Land) are the best performing across Italy, closely followed by IMERG satellite-based product. CMORPH and PERSIANN-CCS-CDR resulted the least performing. Although all the gridded datasets considered showed to have difficulties in detecting precipitation over mountainous areas, they proved to be a valuable alternative to conventional rain gauge networks, especially at longer temporal scales.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102487\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221458182500312X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221458182500312X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究RegionItaly。基于卫星和再分析的网格化降水数据集提供了提供准全球覆盖的降水估计的潜力,可扩展到地面仪器无法进入的地区。尽管它们的质量随着时间的推移而提高,但它们的表现在全球范围内各不相同,因为它们的准确性与所分析地区的地形和气候有关。这种可变性加上越来越多的可自由获取的网格数据集,经常导致学者和水文学家评估降水产品对特定分析的适用性。在本文中,我们通过评估六个广泛使用的网格降水产品(CERRA-Land, ERA5-Land, CHIRPS, CMORPH, IMERG, persann - ccs - cdr)在意大利的性能来解决这个问题。我们通过计算不同时间尺度(每日、每月、每年)的连续和分类性能指标,将它们与国家雨量计网络数据集(SCIA)进行基准测试。我们的研究结果呈现在不同的空间尺度上-从流域到Köppen-Geiger气候带-以支持未来具有不同目标的水文研究。两个再分析数据集(即ERA5-Land和CERRA-Land)在意大利表现最好,紧随其后的是基于IMERG卫星的产品。CMORPH和persann - ccs - cdr表现最差。尽管所考虑的所有网格数据集在探测山区降水方面显示出困难,但它们被证明是传统雨量计网络的一个有价值的替代方案,特别是在较长的时间尺度上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is our pick? Assessment of satellite and reanalysis precipitation datasets over Italy

Study Region

Italy.

Study Focus

Gridded precipitation datasets, satellite and reanalysis based, offer the potential to provide precipitation estimates with quasi-global coverage, extending to areas not accessible by ground-based instruments. Even though their quality has improved over time, their performances vary across the globe, since their accuracy is related to the orography and climate of the area under analysis. This variability together with the increasing availability of freely accessible gridded datasets often lead scholars and hydrologists to assess the suitability of precipitation products for specific analyses. In this paper, we address this issue by evaluating the performance of six widely used gridded precipitation products (CERRA-Land, ERA5-Land, CHIRPS, CMORPH, IMERG, PERSIANN-CCS-CDR) over Italy. We benchmark them against the national rain gauge network dataset (SCIA) by computing continuous and categorical performance metrics across different temporal scales (daily, monthly, yearly). Our findings are presented at various spatial scales from watershed to Köppen-Geiger climate zones to support future hydrological studies with diverse objectives.

New Hydrological insights for the Region

The two reanalysis datasets (i.e., ERA5-Land and CERRA-Land) are the best performing across Italy, closely followed by IMERG satellite-based product. CMORPH and PERSIANN-CCS-CDR resulted the least performing. Although all the gridded datasets considered showed to have difficulties in detecting precipitation over mountainous areas, they proved to be a valuable alternative to conventional rain gauge networks, especially at longer temporal scales.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies
Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
284
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies publishes original research papers enhancing the science of hydrology and aiming at region-specific problems, past and future conditions, analysis, review and solutions. The journal particularly welcomes research papers that deliver new insights into region-specific hydrological processes and responses to changing conditions, as well as contributions that incorporate interdisciplinarity and translational science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信