Benedetta Moccia , Luca Buonora , Claudia Bertini , Elena Ridolfi , Fabio Russo , Francesco Napolitano
{"title":"我们的选择是什么?意大利上空卫星和再分析降水数据集的评估","authors":"Benedetta Moccia , Luca Buonora , Claudia Bertini , Elena Ridolfi , Fabio Russo , Francesco Napolitano","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Region</h3><div>Italy.</div></div><div><h3>Study Focus</h3><div>Gridded precipitation datasets, satellite and reanalysis based, offer the potential to provide precipitation estimates with quasi-global coverage, extending to areas not accessible by ground-based instruments. Even though their quality has improved over time, their performances vary across the globe, since their accuracy is related to the orography and climate of the area under analysis. This variability together with the increasing availability of freely accessible gridded datasets often lead scholars and hydrologists to assess the suitability of precipitation products for specific analyses. In this paper, we address this issue by evaluating the performance of six widely used gridded precipitation products (CERRA-Land, ERA5-Land, CHIRPS, CMORPH, IMERG, PERSIANN-CCS-CDR) over Italy. We benchmark them against the national rain gauge network dataset (SCIA) by computing continuous and categorical performance metrics across different temporal scales (daily, monthly, yearly). Our findings are presented at various spatial scales <span><math><mo>−</mo></math></span> from watershed to Köppen-Geiger climate zones <span><math><mo>−</mo></math></span> to support future hydrological studies with diverse objectives.</div></div><div><h3>New Hydrological insights for the Region</h3><div>The two reanalysis datasets (i.e., ERA5-Land and CERRA-Land) are the best performing across Italy, closely followed by IMERG satellite-based product. CMORPH and PERSIANN-CCS-CDR resulted the least performing. Although all the gridded datasets considered showed to have difficulties in detecting precipitation over mountainous areas, they proved to be a valuable alternative to conventional rain gauge networks, especially at longer temporal scales.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 102487"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is our pick? Assessment of satellite and reanalysis precipitation datasets over Italy\",\"authors\":\"Benedetta Moccia , Luca Buonora , Claudia Bertini , Elena Ridolfi , Fabio Russo , Francesco Napolitano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study Region</h3><div>Italy.</div></div><div><h3>Study Focus</h3><div>Gridded precipitation datasets, satellite and reanalysis based, offer the potential to provide precipitation estimates with quasi-global coverage, extending to areas not accessible by ground-based instruments. Even though their quality has improved over time, their performances vary across the globe, since their accuracy is related to the orography and climate of the area under analysis. This variability together with the increasing availability of freely accessible gridded datasets often lead scholars and hydrologists to assess the suitability of precipitation products for specific analyses. In this paper, we address this issue by evaluating the performance of six widely used gridded precipitation products (CERRA-Land, ERA5-Land, CHIRPS, CMORPH, IMERG, PERSIANN-CCS-CDR) over Italy. We benchmark them against the national rain gauge network dataset (SCIA) by computing continuous and categorical performance metrics across different temporal scales (daily, monthly, yearly). Our findings are presented at various spatial scales <span><math><mo>−</mo></math></span> from watershed to Köppen-Geiger climate zones <span><math><mo>−</mo></math></span> to support future hydrological studies with diverse objectives.</div></div><div><h3>New Hydrological insights for the Region</h3><div>The two reanalysis datasets (i.e., ERA5-Land and CERRA-Land) are the best performing across Italy, closely followed by IMERG satellite-based product. CMORPH and PERSIANN-CCS-CDR resulted the least performing. Although all the gridded datasets considered showed to have difficulties in detecting precipitation over mountainous areas, they proved to be a valuable alternative to conventional rain gauge networks, especially at longer temporal scales.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102487\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221458182500312X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221458182500312X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
What is our pick? Assessment of satellite and reanalysis precipitation datasets over Italy
Study Region
Italy.
Study Focus
Gridded precipitation datasets, satellite and reanalysis based, offer the potential to provide precipitation estimates with quasi-global coverage, extending to areas not accessible by ground-based instruments. Even though their quality has improved over time, their performances vary across the globe, since their accuracy is related to the orography and climate of the area under analysis. This variability together with the increasing availability of freely accessible gridded datasets often lead scholars and hydrologists to assess the suitability of precipitation products for specific analyses. In this paper, we address this issue by evaluating the performance of six widely used gridded precipitation products (CERRA-Land, ERA5-Land, CHIRPS, CMORPH, IMERG, PERSIANN-CCS-CDR) over Italy. We benchmark them against the national rain gauge network dataset (SCIA) by computing continuous and categorical performance metrics across different temporal scales (daily, monthly, yearly). Our findings are presented at various spatial scales from watershed to Köppen-Geiger climate zones to support future hydrological studies with diverse objectives.
New Hydrological insights for the Region
The two reanalysis datasets (i.e., ERA5-Land and CERRA-Land) are the best performing across Italy, closely followed by IMERG satellite-based product. CMORPH and PERSIANN-CCS-CDR resulted the least performing. Although all the gridded datasets considered showed to have difficulties in detecting precipitation over mountainous areas, they proved to be a valuable alternative to conventional rain gauge networks, especially at longer temporal scales.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies publishes original research papers enhancing the science of hydrology and aiming at region-specific problems, past and future conditions, analysis, review and solutions. The journal particularly welcomes research papers that deliver new insights into region-specific hydrological processes and responses to changing conditions, as well as contributions that incorporate interdisciplinarity and translational science.