Shoaib Hassan , Muhammad Kamran , Sarfraz Ali Shad , Safdar Khalil
{"title":"14种杀虫剂对一种防虫剂的毒性比较研究(神经翅目:瓢虫科)和其捕食物solenopsis麻蚧(半翅目:伪瓢虫科)","authors":"Shoaib Hassan , Muhammad Kamran , Sarfraz Ali Shad , Safdar Khalil","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The green lacewing, <em>Chrysoperla carnea</em> (Stephens), is a generalist predator that suppresses major cotton pests, particularly <em>Phenacoccus solenopsis</em> Tinsley. However, the extensive use of insecticides negatively impacts <em>C. carnea</em>. To evaluate the compatibility of chemical pesticides with <em>C. carnea</em>, we examined the acute toxicity of fourteen insecticides and assessed their safety for <em>C. carnea</em> compared to its prey, <em>P. solenopsis</em>, under laboratory conditions. The results showed that different insecticides fluctuated extensively in their toxicities, and LC<sub>50s</sub> ranged from 0.22 mg/L to 1842.91 mg/L. Among all the tested insecticides, the insecticide mixture (profenofos + cypermethrin) exhibited the highest toxicity to <em>C. carnea</em>, being 8376.86 times more toxic than the phenylpyrazole insecticide, fipronil. The results of selectivity ratios revealed that organophosphates, carbamates, and pyrethroids were non-selective with more or similar toxicity to predator and prey were classified as extremely high risk. However, all other tested insecticides were more toxic to prey and selective to predators and were categorized as medium or low risk. These findings can inform strategies that incorporate <em>C. carnea</em> as part of an integrated pest management program for <em>P. solenopsis</em>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the toxicity risk of fourteen insecticides to a biocontrol agent Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) compared to its prey Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)\",\"authors\":\"Shoaib Hassan , Muhammad Kamran , Sarfraz Ali Shad , Safdar Khalil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The green lacewing, <em>Chrysoperla carnea</em> (Stephens), is a generalist predator that suppresses major cotton pests, particularly <em>Phenacoccus solenopsis</em> Tinsley. However, the extensive use of insecticides negatively impacts <em>C. carnea</em>. To evaluate the compatibility of chemical pesticides with <em>C. carnea</em>, we examined the acute toxicity of fourteen insecticides and assessed their safety for <em>C. carnea</em> compared to its prey, <em>P. solenopsis</em>, under laboratory conditions. The results showed that different insecticides fluctuated extensively in their toxicities, and LC<sub>50s</sub> ranged from 0.22 mg/L to 1842.91 mg/L. Among all the tested insecticides, the insecticide mixture (profenofos + cypermethrin) exhibited the highest toxicity to <em>C. carnea</em>, being 8376.86 times more toxic than the phenylpyrazole insecticide, fipronil. The results of selectivity ratios revealed that organophosphates, carbamates, and pyrethroids were non-selective with more or similar toxicity to predator and prey were classified as extremely high risk. However, all other tested insecticides were more toxic to prey and selective to predators and were categorized as medium or low risk. These findings can inform strategies that incorporate <em>C. carnea</em> as part of an integrated pest management program for <em>P. solenopsis</em>.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Protection\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425001814\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425001814","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigating the toxicity risk of fourteen insecticides to a biocontrol agent Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) compared to its prey Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)
The green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens), is a generalist predator that suppresses major cotton pests, particularly Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley. However, the extensive use of insecticides negatively impacts C. carnea. To evaluate the compatibility of chemical pesticides with C. carnea, we examined the acute toxicity of fourteen insecticides and assessed their safety for C. carnea compared to its prey, P. solenopsis, under laboratory conditions. The results showed that different insecticides fluctuated extensively in their toxicities, and LC50s ranged from 0.22 mg/L to 1842.91 mg/L. Among all the tested insecticides, the insecticide mixture (profenofos + cypermethrin) exhibited the highest toxicity to C. carnea, being 8376.86 times more toxic than the phenylpyrazole insecticide, fipronil. The results of selectivity ratios revealed that organophosphates, carbamates, and pyrethroids were non-selective with more or similar toxicity to predator and prey were classified as extremely high risk. However, all other tested insecticides were more toxic to prey and selective to predators and were categorized as medium or low risk. These findings can inform strategies that incorporate C. carnea as part of an integrated pest management program for P. solenopsis.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.