Giedre Silkuniene, Mantas Silkunas, Olga N. Pakhomova, Iurii Semenov, Andrei G. Pakhomov
{"title":"脉冲包的MHz压缩有利于电穿孔的远程聚焦","authors":"Giedre Silkuniene, Mantas Silkunas, Olga N. Pakhomova, Iurii Semenov, Andrei G. Pakhomov","doi":"10.1016/j.bioelechem.2025.109016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Stimulation by pulsed electric fields (PEFs) normally follows PEF strength and weakens with distance from electrodes. Bipolar cancellation, caused by the electric field reversal, can offset this dependence. Remote focusing can be achieved by stimulation with nanosecond pulse packets that generate multiphasic, bipolar interference patterns near electrodes while preserving unipolar PEF at the remote target. We studied how the packet repetition rate, pulse width, and packet number influence remote focusing of electroporation and its suppression near electrodes. Cell monolayers were electroporated by packets of 300-, 600-, or 900-ns pulses from four needle electrodes arranged in a square with 15.3-mm diagonals. Electroporative dye uptake peaked at the center of the square and decreased laterally following Lorentzian distribution. Higher packet rates, longer pulses, and a smaller number of packets sharpened the central peak, reducing its full width at half maximum (FWHM) to 1.1 mm, which was 7.3 % of the diagonal and just 2.3 % of the electrode array area. At 0.2 MHz, electroporation near electrodes was 40-fold weaker than at the center, despite a 4-fold stronger electric field. This near-complete suppression of off-target effects, combined with sharper remote focusing, provides a critical advantage for precise targeting of PEF effects in biomedical applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":252,"journal":{"name":"Bioelectrochemistry","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 109016"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MHz compression of pulse packets facilitates remote focusing of electroporation\",\"authors\":\"Giedre Silkuniene, Mantas Silkunas, Olga N. Pakhomova, Iurii Semenov, Andrei G. Pakhomov\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bioelechem.2025.109016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Stimulation by pulsed electric fields (PEFs) normally follows PEF strength and weakens with distance from electrodes. Bipolar cancellation, caused by the electric field reversal, can offset this dependence. Remote focusing can be achieved by stimulation with nanosecond pulse packets that generate multiphasic, bipolar interference patterns near electrodes while preserving unipolar PEF at the remote target. We studied how the packet repetition rate, pulse width, and packet number influence remote focusing of electroporation and its suppression near electrodes. Cell monolayers were electroporated by packets of 300-, 600-, or 900-ns pulses from four needle electrodes arranged in a square with 15.3-mm diagonals. Electroporative dye uptake peaked at the center of the square and decreased laterally following Lorentzian distribution. Higher packet rates, longer pulses, and a smaller number of packets sharpened the central peak, reducing its full width at half maximum (FWHM) to 1.1 mm, which was 7.3 % of the diagonal and just 2.3 % of the electrode array area. At 0.2 MHz, electroporation near electrodes was 40-fold weaker than at the center, despite a 4-fold stronger electric field. This near-complete suppression of off-target effects, combined with sharper remote focusing, provides a critical advantage for precise targeting of PEF effects in biomedical applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioelectrochemistry\",\"volume\":\"166 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioelectrochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567539425001197\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioelectrochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567539425001197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
MHz compression of pulse packets facilitates remote focusing of electroporation
Stimulation by pulsed electric fields (PEFs) normally follows PEF strength and weakens with distance from electrodes. Bipolar cancellation, caused by the electric field reversal, can offset this dependence. Remote focusing can be achieved by stimulation with nanosecond pulse packets that generate multiphasic, bipolar interference patterns near electrodes while preserving unipolar PEF at the remote target. We studied how the packet repetition rate, pulse width, and packet number influence remote focusing of electroporation and its suppression near electrodes. Cell monolayers were electroporated by packets of 300-, 600-, or 900-ns pulses from four needle electrodes arranged in a square with 15.3-mm diagonals. Electroporative dye uptake peaked at the center of the square and decreased laterally following Lorentzian distribution. Higher packet rates, longer pulses, and a smaller number of packets sharpened the central peak, reducing its full width at half maximum (FWHM) to 1.1 mm, which was 7.3 % of the diagonal and just 2.3 % of the electrode array area. At 0.2 MHz, electroporation near electrodes was 40-fold weaker than at the center, despite a 4-fold stronger electric field. This near-complete suppression of off-target effects, combined with sharper remote focusing, provides a critical advantage for precise targeting of PEF effects in biomedical applications.
期刊介绍:
An International Journal Devoted to Electrochemical Aspects of Biology and Biological Aspects of Electrochemistry
Bioelectrochemistry is an international journal devoted to electrochemical principles in biology and biological aspects of electrochemistry. It publishes experimental and theoretical papers dealing with the electrochemical aspects of:
• Electrified interfaces (electric double layers, adsorption, electron transfer, protein electrochemistry, basic principles of biosensors, biosensor interfaces and bio-nanosensor design and construction.
• Electric and magnetic field effects (field-dependent processes, field interactions with molecules, intramolecular field effects, sensory systems for electric and magnetic fields, molecular and cellular mechanisms)
• Bioenergetics and signal transduction (energy conversion, photosynthetic and visual membranes)
• Biomembranes and model membranes (thermodynamics and mechanics, membrane transport, electroporation, fusion and insertion)
• Electrochemical applications in medicine and biotechnology (drug delivery and gene transfer to cells and tissues, iontophoresis, skin electroporation, injury and repair).
• Organization and use of arrays in-vitro and in-vivo, including as part of feedback control.
• Electrochemical interrogation of biofilms as generated by microorganisms and tissue reaction associated with medical implants.