爆炸荷载作用下钢结构动力响应的试验研究

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Arumugam D. , Kaviarasu K. , Alagappan P.
{"title":"爆炸荷载作用下钢结构动力响应的试验研究","authors":"Arumugam D. ,&nbsp;Kaviarasu K. ,&nbsp;Alagappan P.","doi":"10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Studying the dynamic response of a structure subjected to a blast loading has always been of interest, especially for the army, navy and any defense infrastructure facilities. In the blast resistant design of a structure, failing to incorporate an appropriate material model or neglecting FSI effects can lead to an erroneous prediction of structural responses. Experimental studies in this area have primarily focused on impulse loading and the associated structural responses with minimal work spanning a broad spectrum of the <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> ratios (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> is the duration of the blast load, and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> is the natural period of the structure). International codes and the Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF) procedure on blast resistant design of structures do not account for the FSI effects, thereby resulting in a considerably conservative design. To address the above gaps, shock tube experiments using Blast Wave Simulators (BWS) are conducted across a wide range of <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> ratios (0.2 to 17), by varying the parameters such as (a) sample thickness, (b) support/boundary conditions and (c) blast load intensity. Experimental observations reveal that less-stiff structures undergo significant deformation, which reduces the load acting on the structure compared to more-stiff structures. Comparing the experimental results with the analytical approach shows that the peak-reflected overpressure is overpredicted in the analytical approach with a maximum difference of 30 %. It is also found that there is a significant difference between the experimental results and the analytical model (or) the existing standard procedure on the blast resistant design of the structure. Overall, this study highlights the importance of incorporating FSI effects and an analytical approach with realistic material modeling in the blast resistant design of structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50318,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","volume":"205 ","pages":"Article 105389"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental study on the dynamic response of steel structure subjected to blast load\",\"authors\":\"Arumugam D. ,&nbsp;Kaviarasu K. ,&nbsp;Alagappan P.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2025.105389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Studying the dynamic response of a structure subjected to a blast loading has always been of interest, especially for the army, navy and any defense infrastructure facilities. In the blast resistant design of a structure, failing to incorporate an appropriate material model or neglecting FSI effects can lead to an erroneous prediction of structural responses. Experimental studies in this area have primarily focused on impulse loading and the associated structural responses with minimal work spanning a broad spectrum of the <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> ratios (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> is the duration of the blast load, and <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow></msub></math></span> is the natural period of the structure). International codes and the Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF) procedure on blast resistant design of structures do not account for the FSI effects, thereby resulting in a considerably conservative design. To address the above gaps, shock tube experiments using Blast Wave Simulators (BWS) are conducted across a wide range of <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub><mo>/</mo><msub><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> ratios (0.2 to 17), by varying the parameters such as (a) sample thickness, (b) support/boundary conditions and (c) blast load intensity. Experimental observations reveal that less-stiff structures undergo significant deformation, which reduces the load acting on the structure compared to more-stiff structures. Comparing the experimental results with the analytical approach shows that the peak-reflected overpressure is overpredicted in the analytical approach with a maximum difference of 30 %. It is also found that there is a significant difference between the experimental results and the analytical model (or) the existing standard procedure on the blast resistant design of the structure. Overall, this study highlights the importance of incorporating FSI effects and an analytical approach with realistic material modeling in the blast resistant design of structures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Impact Engineering\",\"volume\":\"205 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Impact Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X25001691\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X25001691","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究结构在爆炸荷载作用下的动力响应一直是人们感兴趣的问题,特别是对于陆军、海军和任何国防基础设施而言。在结构的抗爆炸设计中,未能纳入适当的材料模型或忽略FSI效应可能导致结构响应的错误预测。该领域的实验研究主要集中在脉冲载荷和相关的结构响应上,只需最小的工作量,就能跨越td/tn的宽谱(td是爆炸载荷的持续时间,tn是结构的自然周期)。国际规范和结构抗爆炸设计的单自由度(SDOF)程序没有考虑到FSI效应,从而导致设计相当保守。为了解决上述差距,使用冲击波模拟器(BWS)在td/tn比(0.2至17)的大范围内进行了激波管实验,通过改变(a)样品厚度,(b)支撑/边界条件和(c)爆炸载荷强度等参数。实验观察表明,较低刚度的结构承受显著的变形,这减少了作用在结构上的载荷与较刚性的结构相比。实验结果与解析法的比较表明,解析法对峰值反射超压的预测过高,最大偏差达30%。实验结果与分析模型(或现行标准程序)在结构抗爆炸设计上存在显著差异。总的来说,这项研究强调了在结构的抗爆炸设计中结合FSI效应和现实材料建模的分析方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental study on the dynamic response of steel structure subjected to blast load
Studying the dynamic response of a structure subjected to a blast loading has always been of interest, especially for the army, navy and any defense infrastructure facilities. In the blast resistant design of a structure, failing to incorporate an appropriate material model or neglecting FSI effects can lead to an erroneous prediction of structural responses. Experimental studies in this area have primarily focused on impulse loading and the associated structural responses with minimal work spanning a broad spectrum of the td/tn ratios (td is the duration of the blast load, and tn is the natural period of the structure). International codes and the Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF) procedure on blast resistant design of structures do not account for the FSI effects, thereby resulting in a considerably conservative design. To address the above gaps, shock tube experiments using Blast Wave Simulators (BWS) are conducted across a wide range of td/tn ratios (0.2 to 17), by varying the parameters such as (a) sample thickness, (b) support/boundary conditions and (c) blast load intensity. Experimental observations reveal that less-stiff structures undergo significant deformation, which reduces the load acting on the structure compared to more-stiff structures. Comparing the experimental results with the analytical approach shows that the peak-reflected overpressure is overpredicted in the analytical approach with a maximum difference of 30 %. It is also found that there is a significant difference between the experimental results and the analytical model (or) the existing standard procedure on the blast resistant design of the structure. Overall, this study highlights the importance of incorporating FSI effects and an analytical approach with realistic material modeling in the blast resistant design of structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Impact Engineering
International Journal of Impact Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.70%
发文量
241
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Impact Engineering, established in 1983 publishes original research findings related to the response of structures, components and materials subjected to impact, blast and high-rate loading. Areas relevant to the journal encompass the following general topics and those associated with them: -Behaviour and failure of structures and materials under impact and blast loading -Systems for protection and absorption of impact and blast loading -Terminal ballistics -Dynamic behaviour and failure of materials including plasticity and fracture -Stress waves -Structural crashworthiness -High-rate mechanical and forming processes -Impact, blast and high-rate loading/measurement techniques and their applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信