创新中的协作强度:重新定义与实证验证

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Wim G. Biemans , Helen O'Keeffe , Thomas O'Toole
{"title":"创新中的协作强度:重新定义与实证验证","authors":"Wim G. Biemans ,&nbsp;Helen O'Keeffe ,&nbsp;Thomas O'Toole","doi":"10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over a period of decades, innovation has transformed into a collaborative endeavor. An extensive literature focuses on collaboration in general terms, for example on the number of collaboration partners (breadth of collaboration). However, the intensity (or depth) of collaboration may vary widely across partners and contexts. Unfortunately, empirical findings on collaboration intensity (CI) are fragmented, ambiguous and difficult to compare. We reconceptualize CI as a second order, six dimensional construct, develop a reflective CI scale and test this scale using a survey of 185 firms who practiced collaborative innovation. Our deconstruction of CI into six dimensions provides novel insights into the relative importance of dimensions and reveal that the commonly used dimensions ‘collaborative communication’ and ‘information sharing’ are actually less important than ‘joint learning’, ‘social bonding’, and ‘creativity’. In addition, our findings investigate the complete chain of effects, from antecedents to CI to collaborative innovation outcomes. For example, they strongly support the positive impact of CI on innovation performance and long-term orientation, for which the extant literature provides mixed empirical results. Our paper concludes with implications for management and promising suggestions for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51345,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Marketing Management","volume":"128 ","pages":"Pages 36-53"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaboration intensity in innovation: A reconceptualization and empirical validation\",\"authors\":\"Wim G. Biemans ,&nbsp;Helen O'Keeffe ,&nbsp;Thomas O'Toole\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Over a period of decades, innovation has transformed into a collaborative endeavor. An extensive literature focuses on collaboration in general terms, for example on the number of collaboration partners (breadth of collaboration). However, the intensity (or depth) of collaboration may vary widely across partners and contexts. Unfortunately, empirical findings on collaboration intensity (CI) are fragmented, ambiguous and difficult to compare. We reconceptualize CI as a second order, six dimensional construct, develop a reflective CI scale and test this scale using a survey of 185 firms who practiced collaborative innovation. Our deconstruction of CI into six dimensions provides novel insights into the relative importance of dimensions and reveal that the commonly used dimensions ‘collaborative communication’ and ‘information sharing’ are actually less important than ‘joint learning’, ‘social bonding’, and ‘creativity’. In addition, our findings investigate the complete chain of effects, from antecedents to CI to collaborative innovation outcomes. For example, they strongly support the positive impact of CI on innovation performance and long-term orientation, for which the extant literature provides mixed empirical results. Our paper concludes with implications for management and promising suggestions for future research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial Marketing Management\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 36-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial Marketing Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850125000811\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Marketing Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850125000811","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,创新已经转变为一种协作努力。广泛的文献关注一般意义上的合作,例如合作伙伴的数量(合作的广度)。然而,合作的强度(或深度)可能因合作伙伴和环境的不同而有很大差异。不幸的是,关于协作强度(CI)的实证研究结果是碎片化的、模糊的和难以比较的。我们将CI重新定义为二阶、六维结构,开发了一个反思CI量表,并通过对185家实施协作创新的公司的调查对该量表进行了测试。我们将CI分解为六个维度,为维度的相对重要性提供了新的见解,并揭示了常用的维度“协作沟通”和“信息共享”实际上不如“共同学习”、“社会纽带”和“创造力”重要。此外,我们的研究结果调查了从前因由到CI再到协同创新结果的完整效应链。例如,他们强烈支持CI对创新绩效和长期导向的积极影响,现有文献对此提供了混合的实证结果。本文总结了对管理的启示和对未来研究的有希望的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collaboration intensity in innovation: A reconceptualization and empirical validation
Over a period of decades, innovation has transformed into a collaborative endeavor. An extensive literature focuses on collaboration in general terms, for example on the number of collaboration partners (breadth of collaboration). However, the intensity (or depth) of collaboration may vary widely across partners and contexts. Unfortunately, empirical findings on collaboration intensity (CI) are fragmented, ambiguous and difficult to compare. We reconceptualize CI as a second order, six dimensional construct, develop a reflective CI scale and test this scale using a survey of 185 firms who practiced collaborative innovation. Our deconstruction of CI into six dimensions provides novel insights into the relative importance of dimensions and reveal that the commonly used dimensions ‘collaborative communication’ and ‘information sharing’ are actually less important than ‘joint learning’, ‘social bonding’, and ‘creativity’. In addition, our findings investigate the complete chain of effects, from antecedents to CI to collaborative innovation outcomes. For example, they strongly support the positive impact of CI on innovation performance and long-term orientation, for which the extant literature provides mixed empirical results. Our paper concludes with implications for management and promising suggestions for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
20.40%
发文量
255
期刊介绍: Industrial Marketing Management delivers theoretical, empirical, and case-based research tailored to the requirements of marketing scholars and practitioners engaged in industrial and business-to-business markets. With an editorial review board comprising prominent international scholars and practitioners, the journal ensures a harmonious blend of theory and practical applications in all articles. Scholars from North America, Europe, Australia/New Zealand, Asia, and various global regions contribute the latest findings to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of industrial markets. This holistic approach keeps readers informed with the most timely data and contemporary insights essential for informed marketing decisions and strategies in global industrial and business-to-business markets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信