{"title":"创新中的协作强度:重新定义与实证验证","authors":"Wim G. Biemans , Helen O'Keeffe , Thomas O'Toole","doi":"10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over a period of decades, innovation has transformed into a collaborative endeavor. An extensive literature focuses on collaboration in general terms, for example on the number of collaboration partners (breadth of collaboration). However, the intensity (or depth) of collaboration may vary widely across partners and contexts. Unfortunately, empirical findings on collaboration intensity (CI) are fragmented, ambiguous and difficult to compare. We reconceptualize CI as a second order, six dimensional construct, develop a reflective CI scale and test this scale using a survey of 185 firms who practiced collaborative innovation. Our deconstruction of CI into six dimensions provides novel insights into the relative importance of dimensions and reveal that the commonly used dimensions ‘collaborative communication’ and ‘information sharing’ are actually less important than ‘joint learning’, ‘social bonding’, and ‘creativity’. In addition, our findings investigate the complete chain of effects, from antecedents to CI to collaborative innovation outcomes. For example, they strongly support the positive impact of CI on innovation performance and long-term orientation, for which the extant literature provides mixed empirical results. Our paper concludes with implications for management and promising suggestions for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51345,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Marketing Management","volume":"128 ","pages":"Pages 36-53"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaboration intensity in innovation: A reconceptualization and empirical validation\",\"authors\":\"Wim G. Biemans , Helen O'Keeffe , Thomas O'Toole\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.indmarman.2025.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Over a period of decades, innovation has transformed into a collaborative endeavor. An extensive literature focuses on collaboration in general terms, for example on the number of collaboration partners (breadth of collaboration). However, the intensity (or depth) of collaboration may vary widely across partners and contexts. Unfortunately, empirical findings on collaboration intensity (CI) are fragmented, ambiguous and difficult to compare. We reconceptualize CI as a second order, six dimensional construct, develop a reflective CI scale and test this scale using a survey of 185 firms who practiced collaborative innovation. Our deconstruction of CI into six dimensions provides novel insights into the relative importance of dimensions and reveal that the commonly used dimensions ‘collaborative communication’ and ‘information sharing’ are actually less important than ‘joint learning’, ‘social bonding’, and ‘creativity’. In addition, our findings investigate the complete chain of effects, from antecedents to CI to collaborative innovation outcomes. For example, they strongly support the positive impact of CI on innovation performance and long-term orientation, for which the extant literature provides mixed empirical results. Our paper concludes with implications for management and promising suggestions for future research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial Marketing Management\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 36-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial Marketing Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850125000811\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Marketing Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850125000811","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Collaboration intensity in innovation: A reconceptualization and empirical validation
Over a period of decades, innovation has transformed into a collaborative endeavor. An extensive literature focuses on collaboration in general terms, for example on the number of collaboration partners (breadth of collaboration). However, the intensity (or depth) of collaboration may vary widely across partners and contexts. Unfortunately, empirical findings on collaboration intensity (CI) are fragmented, ambiguous and difficult to compare. We reconceptualize CI as a second order, six dimensional construct, develop a reflective CI scale and test this scale using a survey of 185 firms who practiced collaborative innovation. Our deconstruction of CI into six dimensions provides novel insights into the relative importance of dimensions and reveal that the commonly used dimensions ‘collaborative communication’ and ‘information sharing’ are actually less important than ‘joint learning’, ‘social bonding’, and ‘creativity’. In addition, our findings investigate the complete chain of effects, from antecedents to CI to collaborative innovation outcomes. For example, they strongly support the positive impact of CI on innovation performance and long-term orientation, for which the extant literature provides mixed empirical results. Our paper concludes with implications for management and promising suggestions for future research.
期刊介绍:
Industrial Marketing Management delivers theoretical, empirical, and case-based research tailored to the requirements of marketing scholars and practitioners engaged in industrial and business-to-business markets. With an editorial review board comprising prominent international scholars and practitioners, the journal ensures a harmonious blend of theory and practical applications in all articles. Scholars from North America, Europe, Australia/New Zealand, Asia, and various global regions contribute the latest findings to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of industrial markets. This holistic approach keeps readers informed with the most timely data and contemporary insights essential for informed marketing decisions and strategies in global industrial and business-to-business markets.