前列腺癌在年轻男性中的检测:PROBASE试验中系统活检和磁共振成像活检的比较分析

IF 25.3 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Rouvier Al-Monajjed, Matthias Boschheidgen, Jale Lakes, Agne Krilaviciute, Jan-Philipp Radtke, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, David Bonekamp, Kathleen Herkommer, Matthias Jahnen, Jürgen E. Gschwend, Daniel Düx, Frank Wacker, Marcus R. Makowski, Andreas Sauter, Markus A. Kuczyk, Nina Harke, Jürgen Debus, Christoph Grott, Christian Arsov, Petra Seibold, Peter Albers
{"title":"前列腺癌在年轻男性中的检测:PROBASE试验中系统活检和磁共振成像活检的比较分析","authors":"Rouvier Al-Monajjed, Matthias Boschheidgen, Jale Lakes, Agne Krilaviciute, Jan-Philipp Radtke, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, David Bonekamp, Kathleen Herkommer, Matthias Jahnen, Jürgen E. Gschwend, Daniel Düx, Frank Wacker, Marcus R. Makowski, Andreas Sauter, Markus A. Kuczyk, Nina Harke, Jürgen Debus, Christoph Grott, Christian Arsov, Petra Seibold, Peter Albers","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2025.05.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The optimal approach for prostate cancer (PC) screening, including the ideal starting age and most effective diagnostic method, remains under investigation. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx) and systematic biopsy (SBx) in detecting clinically significant PC (csPC) in men aged 45–50 yr in PROBASE, a prospective, randomized trial of a risk-adapted screening strategy. A total of 525 participants with elevated prostate-specific antigen (≥3 ng/ml) underwent MRI followed by biopsy. Of the 209 PC cases detected, 148 (71%) were csPC. SBx identified 94% of csPC cases, while TBx detected 74% (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.05). SBx also diagnosed significantly more low-grade PCs than TBx (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). These findings suggest that relying solely on MRI-TBx may lead to underdiagnosis of csPC. Combining SBx with TBx remains the most effective strategy for early detection of PC in young men undergoing screening. Future research should explore optimization strategies to reduce unnecessary biopsies while maintaining high detection rates for csPC.This trial is registered on the ISRCTN registry as ISRCTN37591328 (<span><span>https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN37591328</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>). The study protocol can be accessed at <span><span>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.022</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>.","PeriodicalId":12223,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prostate Cancer Detection in Younger Men: A Comparative Analysis of Systematic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging–targeted Biopsy in the PROBASE Trial\",\"authors\":\"Rouvier Al-Monajjed, Matthias Boschheidgen, Jale Lakes, Agne Krilaviciute, Jan-Philipp Radtke, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, David Bonekamp, Kathleen Herkommer, Matthias Jahnen, Jürgen E. Gschwend, Daniel Düx, Frank Wacker, Marcus R. Makowski, Andreas Sauter, Markus A. Kuczyk, Nina Harke, Jürgen Debus, Christoph Grott, Christian Arsov, Petra Seibold, Peter Albers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eururo.2025.05.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The optimal approach for prostate cancer (PC) screening, including the ideal starting age and most effective diagnostic method, remains under investigation. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx) and systematic biopsy (SBx) in detecting clinically significant PC (csPC) in men aged 45–50 yr in PROBASE, a prospective, randomized trial of a risk-adapted screening strategy. A total of 525 participants with elevated prostate-specific antigen (≥3 ng/ml) underwent MRI followed by biopsy. Of the 209 PC cases detected, 148 (71%) were csPC. SBx identified 94% of csPC cases, while TBx detected 74% (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.05). SBx also diagnosed significantly more low-grade PCs than TBx (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). These findings suggest that relying solely on MRI-TBx may lead to underdiagnosis of csPC. Combining SBx with TBx remains the most effective strategy for early detection of PC in young men undergoing screening. Future research should explore optimization strategies to reduce unnecessary biopsies while maintaining high detection rates for csPC.This trial is registered on the ISRCTN registry as ISRCTN37591328 (<span><span>https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN37591328</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>). The study protocol can be accessed at <span><span>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.022</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":25.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.05.020\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.05.020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前列腺癌(PC)筛查的最佳方法,包括理想的起始年龄和最有效的诊断方法,仍在研究中。我们在PROBASE中评估了磁共振成像(MRI)靶向活检(TBx)和系统活检(SBx)在检测45-50岁男性临床显著PC (csPC)中的诊断性能,PROBASE是一项前瞻性随机试验,用于风险适应筛查策略。共有525名前列腺特异性抗原升高(≥3ng /ml)的参与者接受了MRI和活检。在209例PC病例中,148例(71%)为csPC。SBx检出率为94%,TBx检出率为74% (p≤0.05)。SBx诊断出的低级pc也明显多于TBx (p <;0.001)。这些发现表明,单纯依赖MRI-TBx可能导致csPC的漏诊。在接受筛查的年轻男性中,联合使用SBx和TBx仍然是早期发现PC最有效的策略。未来的研究应探索优化策略,以减少不必要的活检,同时保持csPC的高检出率。该试验在ISRCTN注册中心注册为ISRCTN37591328 (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN37591328)。研究方案可在https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.022上访问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prostate Cancer Detection in Younger Men: A Comparative Analysis of Systematic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging–targeted Biopsy in the PROBASE Trial
The optimal approach for prostate cancer (PC) screening, including the ideal starting age and most effective diagnostic method, remains under investigation. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx) and systematic biopsy (SBx) in detecting clinically significant PC (csPC) in men aged 45–50 yr in PROBASE, a prospective, randomized trial of a risk-adapted screening strategy. A total of 525 participants with elevated prostate-specific antigen (≥3 ng/ml) underwent MRI followed by biopsy. Of the 209 PC cases detected, 148 (71%) were csPC. SBx identified 94% of csPC cases, while TBx detected 74% (p ≤ 0.05). SBx also diagnosed significantly more low-grade PCs than TBx (p < 0.001). These findings suggest that relying solely on MRI-TBx may lead to underdiagnosis of csPC. Combining SBx with TBx remains the most effective strategy for early detection of PC in young men undergoing screening. Future research should explore optimization strategies to reduce unnecessary biopsies while maintaining high detection rates for csPC.This trial is registered on the ISRCTN registry as ISRCTN37591328 (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN37591328). The study protocol can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.022.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European urology
European urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
43.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1753
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles and reviews on a broad spectrum of urological issues. Covering topics such as oncology, impotence, infertility, pediatrics, lithiasis and endourology, the journal also highlights recent advances in techniques, instrumentation, surgery, and pediatric urology. This comprehensive approach provides readers with an in-depth guide to international developments in urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信