Rouvier Al-Monajjed, Matthias Boschheidgen, Jale Lakes, Agne Krilaviciute, Jan-Philipp Radtke, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, David Bonekamp, Kathleen Herkommer, Matthias Jahnen, Jürgen E. Gschwend, Daniel Düx, Frank Wacker, Marcus R. Makowski, Andreas Sauter, Markus A. Kuczyk, Nina Harke, Jürgen Debus, Christoph Grott, Christian Arsov, Petra Seibold, Peter Albers
{"title":"前列腺癌在年轻男性中的检测:PROBASE试验中系统活检和磁共振成像活检的比较分析","authors":"Rouvier Al-Monajjed, Matthias Boschheidgen, Jale Lakes, Agne Krilaviciute, Jan-Philipp Radtke, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, David Bonekamp, Kathleen Herkommer, Matthias Jahnen, Jürgen E. Gschwend, Daniel Düx, Frank Wacker, Marcus R. Makowski, Andreas Sauter, Markus A. Kuczyk, Nina Harke, Jürgen Debus, Christoph Grott, Christian Arsov, Petra Seibold, Peter Albers","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2025.05.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The optimal approach for prostate cancer (PC) screening, including the ideal starting age and most effective diagnostic method, remains under investigation. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx) and systematic biopsy (SBx) in detecting clinically significant PC (csPC) in men aged 45–50 yr in PROBASE, a prospective, randomized trial of a risk-adapted screening strategy. A total of 525 participants with elevated prostate-specific antigen (≥3 ng/ml) underwent MRI followed by biopsy. Of the 209 PC cases detected, 148 (71%) were csPC. SBx identified 94% of csPC cases, while TBx detected 74% (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.05). SBx also diagnosed significantly more low-grade PCs than TBx (<em>p</em> < 0.001). These findings suggest that relying solely on MRI-TBx may lead to underdiagnosis of csPC. Combining SBx with TBx remains the most effective strategy for early detection of PC in young men undergoing screening. Future research should explore optimization strategies to reduce unnecessary biopsies while maintaining high detection rates for csPC.This trial is registered on the ISRCTN registry as ISRCTN37591328 (<span><span>https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN37591328</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>). The study protocol can be accessed at <span><span>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.022</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>.","PeriodicalId":12223,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prostate Cancer Detection in Younger Men: A Comparative Analysis of Systematic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging–targeted Biopsy in the PROBASE Trial\",\"authors\":\"Rouvier Al-Monajjed, Matthias Boschheidgen, Jale Lakes, Agne Krilaviciute, Jan-Philipp Radtke, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, David Bonekamp, Kathleen Herkommer, Matthias Jahnen, Jürgen E. Gschwend, Daniel Düx, Frank Wacker, Marcus R. Makowski, Andreas Sauter, Markus A. Kuczyk, Nina Harke, Jürgen Debus, Christoph Grott, Christian Arsov, Petra Seibold, Peter Albers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eururo.2025.05.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The optimal approach for prostate cancer (PC) screening, including the ideal starting age and most effective diagnostic method, remains under investigation. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx) and systematic biopsy (SBx) in detecting clinically significant PC (csPC) in men aged 45–50 yr in PROBASE, a prospective, randomized trial of a risk-adapted screening strategy. A total of 525 participants with elevated prostate-specific antigen (≥3 ng/ml) underwent MRI followed by biopsy. Of the 209 PC cases detected, 148 (71%) were csPC. SBx identified 94% of csPC cases, while TBx detected 74% (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.05). SBx also diagnosed significantly more low-grade PCs than TBx (<em>p</em> < 0.001). These findings suggest that relying solely on MRI-TBx may lead to underdiagnosis of csPC. Combining SBx with TBx remains the most effective strategy for early detection of PC in young men undergoing screening. Future research should explore optimization strategies to reduce unnecessary biopsies while maintaining high detection rates for csPC.This trial is registered on the ISRCTN registry as ISRCTN37591328 (<span><span>https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN37591328</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>). The study protocol can be accessed at <span><span>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.022</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":25.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.05.020\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.05.020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prostate Cancer Detection in Younger Men: A Comparative Analysis of Systematic and Magnetic Resonance Imaging–targeted Biopsy in the PROBASE Trial
The optimal approach for prostate cancer (PC) screening, including the ideal starting age and most effective diagnostic method, remains under investigation. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (TBx) and systematic biopsy (SBx) in detecting clinically significant PC (csPC) in men aged 45–50 yr in PROBASE, a prospective, randomized trial of a risk-adapted screening strategy. A total of 525 participants with elevated prostate-specific antigen (≥3 ng/ml) underwent MRI followed by biopsy. Of the 209 PC cases detected, 148 (71%) were csPC. SBx identified 94% of csPC cases, while TBx detected 74% (p ≤ 0.05). SBx also diagnosed significantly more low-grade PCs than TBx (p < 0.001). These findings suggest that relying solely on MRI-TBx may lead to underdiagnosis of csPC. Combining SBx with TBx remains the most effective strategy for early detection of PC in young men undergoing screening. Future research should explore optimization strategies to reduce unnecessary biopsies while maintaining high detection rates for csPC.This trial is registered on the ISRCTN registry as ISRCTN37591328 (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN37591328). The study protocol can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.022.
期刊介绍:
European Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles and reviews on a broad spectrum of urological issues. Covering topics such as oncology, impotence, infertility, pediatrics, lithiasis and endourology, the journal also highlights recent advances in techniques, instrumentation, surgery, and pediatric urology. This comprehensive approach provides readers with an in-depth guide to international developments in urology.